Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-shelf differences in the pattern and pace of bioerosion of experimental carbonate substrates exposed for 3 years on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patterns of bioerosion of dead corals and rubbles on the northern Great Barrier Reef were studied by using blocks of the massive coral Porites experimentally exposed at six sites, located on an inshore–offshore profile, for 1 year and 3 years. Rates of microbioerosion by microborers, grazing by fish, and macrobioerosion by filter-feeding organisms were simultaneously evaluated using image analysis. Microbioerosion, grazing, and total bioerosion were lower at reefs near the Queensland coast than at the edge of the continental shelf (1.81 kg m−2 and 6.07 kg m−2 after 3 years of exposure respectively, for total bioerosion). The opposite pattern was observed for macrobioerosion. Bioaccretion was negligible. These patterns were evident after 1 year of exposure, and became enhanced after 3 years. Microborers were established and were the main agent of bioerosion after 1 year of exposure, and as the principal support for grazing, continued to be the main cause of carbonate loss after 3 years. Full grazing activity and establishment of a mature community of macroborers required more than 1 year of exposure. After 1 year, macroborers and grazers were the second most important agents of bioerosion on both inshore and offshore reefs. However, after 3 years, grazers became the main agents at all sites except at the inshore sites, where macroborers were the principal agents. Because the contribution of microborers, grazers, and macroborers to bioerosion varies in space and time, we suggest that the estimation of reef carbonate budgets need to take in account the activities of all bioerosion agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonius A, Lipscomb D (2001) First protozoan coral-killer identified in the Indo-Pacific. Atoll Res Bull 481–493:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak RPM (1990) Patterns of echinoid bioerosion in two Pacific coral reef lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 66:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1992) Systematic variations in the depth of skeleton occupied by coral tissue in massive colonies of Porites from the Great Barrier Reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 159:113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell PRF (1991) Status of eutrophication in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. Mar Poll Bull 23:89–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Choat JH (1990) A functional analysis of grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological implications. Environ Biol Fish 28:189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggemann JH, van Oppen MJH, Breeman AM (1994) Foraging by the stoplight parrotfish Sparisoma viride. I. Food selection in different, socially determined habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervino J, Goreau TJ, Nagelkerken I, Smith GW, Hayes R (2001) Yellow band and dark spot syndromes in Caribbean corals: distribution, rate of spread, cytology, and effects on abundance and division rate of zooxanthellae. Hydrobiol 460(1–3):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazottes V, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Peyrot-Clausade M (1995) Bioerosion rates on coral reefs: interaction between macroborers, microborers and grazers (Moorea, French Polynesia). Palaeo 113:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazottes V, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Peyrot-Clausade M, Cuet P (2002) The effects of eutrophication-related alterations to coral reef communities on agents and rates of bioerosion (Reunion Island, Indian Ocean). Coral Reefs 21(4):375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Conand C, Chabanet P, Cuet P, Letourneur Y (1997) The carbonate budget of a fringing reef in La Reunion Island (Indian ocean): sea urchin and fish bioerosion and net calcification. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp Panama City 1:953–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnelie P (1970) Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Applications agronomiques. In: Ducolot J (ed) Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux 2:1–463

  • Edinger EN, Limmon GV, Jompa J, Widjatmoko W, Heikoop J, Risk M (2000) Normal coral growth rates on dying reefs: are coral growth rates good indicators of reef health? Mar Poll Bull 40:404–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furnas MJ (1996) Biological and chemical oceanographic features of the Cairns-cooktown region relevant to Crown-of-Thorns starfish outbreaks. Review for the Crown of Thorns Starfish Research Committee. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn PW (1997) Bioerosion and coral-reef growth: a dynamic balance. In: Birkeland C (ed) Life and death of coral reefs. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 68–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubic S, Schneider J (1979) Carbonate dissolution. In: Trudinger PA, Swaine DJ (eds)Biogeochemical cycling of mineral-forming elements. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubic S, Friedmann I, Schneider J (1981) The lithobiontic ecological niche, with special reference to microorganisms. J Sediment Petrol 51(2):475–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez ED, Alino PM, Yap HT, Licuanan WY (1994) A review of the status of Philippine reefs. Mar Poll Bull 29:62–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallock P (1988) The role of nutrient availability in bioerosion: consequences to carbonate buildups. Palaeo 63:275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes KE, Edinger EN, Hariyadi S, Limmon GV, Risk MJ (2000) Bioerosion of live massive corals and branching coral rubble on Indonesian coral reefs. Mar Poll Bull 40(7):606–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings PA (1986) Biological destruction of coral reefs. Coral Reef 4:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda T, Gilmartin M, Revelante N, Mitchell AW, Carlton JH, Dixon P, Hutchinson SM, Hing Fay E, Boto GM, Iseki K (1980) Biological, chemical and physical observations in inshore waters of the Great Barrier Reef, North Queensland 1975–1978. Australian Institute of Marine Science, technical bulletin. Oceanography Series N°1

  • Johnson DP, Carter RM (1987) Sedimentary framework of mainland fringing reef development, Cape Tribulation area. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority technical memorandum 14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiene WE (1988) A model of bioerosion on the Great Barrier Reef. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp, Panama City 3:449–454

  • Kiene WE, Hutchings PA (1992) Long-term bioerosion of experimental coral substrates from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp, Guam 1:397–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiene WE, Hutchings PA (1994) Bioerosion experiments at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Coral reefs 13:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon C, Takahashi T, Marubini F, Atkinson MJ, Sweeney C, Aceves H, Barnet H, Chipman D, Goddard J (2000) Effect of calcium carbonate saturation state on the calcification rate of an experimental coral reef. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14:639–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laubier L (1962) Le coralligène des Albères. Annales de l’Institut Océanographique de Paris 43:137–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Campion-Alsumard T, Golubic S, Hutchings PA (1995) Microbial endoliths in skeletons of live and dead corals: Porites lobata (Moorea, French Polynesia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 117:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lough JM, Barnes DJ (1997) Several centuries of variation in skeletal extension, density and calcification in massive Porites colonies from the Great Barrier Reef: a proxy for seawater temperature and a background of variability against which to identify unnatural change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:29–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao Che L, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Boury-Esnault N, Payri C, Golubic S, Bezac C (1996) Biodegradation of shells of the black pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera Var. Cumingii, by microborers and sponges of French Polynesia. Mar Biol 126:509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran DP, Reaka-Kudla ML (1988) Bioerosion and availability of shelter for benthic reef organisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 44:249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby PJ, Chisholm JRM, Edwards AJ, Clark CD, Roark EB, Andrefouet S, Jaubert J (2001) Unprecedented bleaching-induced mortality in Porites spp. At Rangiroa Atoll, French Polynesia. Mar Biol 139(1):183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pari N, Peyrot-Clausade M, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Hutchings PA, Chazottes V, Golubic S, Le Campion J, Fontaine MF (1998) Bioerosion of experimental substrates on high islands and atoll lagoons (French Polynesia) after two years of exposure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyrot-Clausade M, Chazottes V, Pari N (1999) Bioerosion in the carbonate budget of two Indo-Pacific reefs: La Reunion Island (Indian ocean) and Moorea (Pacific ocean). Bull Geol Soc Denmark 45:151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrot-Clausade M, Chabanet P, Conand C, Fontaine MF, Letourneur Y, Harmelin-Vivien M (2000) Sea urchin and fish bioerosion on La Réunion and Moorea reefs. Bull Mar Sci 66(2):477–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Prachett MS (2001) Influence of coral symbionts on feeding preferences of crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci in the western Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reaka-Kudla ML, Feingold JS, Glynn W (1996) Experimental studies of rapid bioerosion of coral reefs in the Galapagos Islands. Coral Reefs 15:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Risk MJ, Sammarco PW, Edinger EN (1995) Bioerosion in Acropora across the continental shelf of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 14:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CS (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 62:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose CS, Risk MJ (1985) Increase in Clinoa delitrix infestation of Montastrea cavernosa heads on an originally polluted portion of the Grand Cayman fringing reef. Mar Biol 6:345–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ G (1984) Distribution and abundance of herbivorous grazing fishes in the Central Great Barrier Reef. I. Levels of variability across the entire continental shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 20:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (1984) Applied statistics. A handbook of techniques. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammarco PW (1985) The Great Barrier Reef vs. the Caribbean: comparisons of grazers, coral recruitment patterns and reef recovery. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp Tahiti 4:391–397

  • Sammarco PW, Risk MJ (1990) Large-scale patterns in internal bioerosion of Porites: cross continental shelf trends on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammarco PW, Risk MJ, Rose C (1987) Effects of grazing and damselfish territoriality on internal bioerosion on dead corals: indirect effects. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 112:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer B (1984) Biostatistique. In: Morin G (ed) Gaeten Morin, Boucherrille p 850

  • Schneider J, Torunski H (1983) Biokarst on limestone coasts, morphogenesis and sediment production. Mar Ecol 4(1):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönberg CHL (2002) Substrate effects on the bioeroding desmosponge Cliona orientalis. 1. Bioerosion rates. Mar Ecol 23(4):313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoffin TP, Stearn CW, Boucher D, Frydl P, Hwakins CM, Hunter IG, MacGeachy JK (1980) Calcium carbonate budget of a fringing reef on the west coast of Barbados. Bull Mar Sci 30(2):475–508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Statview 5.0 (1998) Manuel de l’utilisateur. Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, California

  • Stearn CW, Scoffin TP (1977) Carbonate budget of a fringing reef, Barbados. Proc 3rd Inter Coral Reef Symp, California 2:471–476

  • SuperAnova 1.11 (1991) Manuel de l’utilisateur. Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, California

  • Szmant AM (2002) Nutrient enrichment on coral reefs: is it a major cause of coral reef decline? Estuaries 25(4B):743–766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomascik T, Sander F (1987) Effects of eutrophication on reef-building corals. II. Structure of scleractinian coral communities on fringing reefs, Barbados, West Indies. Mar Biol 94:53–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribollet A, Payri C (2001) Bioerosion of the crustose coralline alga Hydrolithon onkodes by microborers in the coral reefs of Moorea, French Polynesia. Oceanol Acta 24:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribollet A, Decherf G, Hutchings PA, Peyrot-Clausade M (2002) Large-scale spatial variability in bioerosion of experimental coral substrates on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): importance of microbrers. Coral Reefs 21:424–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudhope AW, Risk MJ (1985) Rate of dissolution of carbonate sediments by microboring organisms, Davies Reef, Australia. J Sediment Petrol 55(3):440–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C (2000) Status of coral reefs of the world: 2000. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski E (1994) Physical oceanography processes of the Great Barrier Reef. In: Pickard GL, Raton B, Arbor A (eds) CRC Press, London, pp 1–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubia M, Peyrot-Clausade M (2001) Internal bioerosion of Acropora formosa in Réunion (Indian Ocean): microborer and macroborer activities. Oceanol Acta 24:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by grants from the French–Australian Cooperation in Marine Sciences and the French Program PNRCO about coral reefs, and by GBRMPA for allowing us to collect coral. We would like to thank M. Peyrot-Clausade, P. Hutchings and A.J. Underwood for having made this study possible and for their help. We also thank the following companies and persons for their assistance in the field or providing logistical support: Undersea Explorer company and its crew at Port Douglas, L. Vail and A. Hoggett of Lizard Island Marine Station, K. Atwood of the Australian Museum, Sydney, C. Marschal and C. Bezac of the Marine Station d’Endoume, Marseille. We thank also C. Langdon and Columbia University of the city of New York, E. Hochberg, J. Le Campion and T. Le Campion for their technical support, help and reviews.

Author information

Author notes

  1. A. Tribollet

    Present address:  , 58 rue Victor Hugo, 37540, St Cyr/Loire, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, UMR CNRS 6540, Université de la Méditerranée, Station Marine d’Endoume, rue de la batterie des Lions, 13007, Marseille, France

    A. Tribollet

  2. Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    S. Golubic

Authors
  1. A. Tribollet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Golubic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Tribollet.

Additional information

Communicated by Environmental Editor B.C. Hatcher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tribollet, A., Golubic, S. Cross-shelf differences in the pattern and pace of bioerosion of experimental carbonate substrates exposed for 3 years on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 24, 422–434 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0003-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0003-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation