Skip to main content
Log in

A QTL affecting daily feed intake maps to Chromosome 2 in pigs

  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our understanding of the molecular genetic basis of several key performance traits in pigs has been significantly advanced through the quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping approach. However, in contrast to growth and fatness traits, the genetic basis of feed intake traits has rarely been investigated through QTL mapping. Since feed intake is an important component of efficient pig production, the identification of QTL affecting feed intake may lead to the identification of genetic markers that can be used in selection programs. In this study a QTL analysis for feed intake, feeding behavior, and growth traits was performed in an F2 population derived from a cross between Chinese Meishan and European Large White pigs. A QTL with a significant effect on daily feed intake (DFI) was identified on Sus scrofa Chromosome 2 (SSC2). A number of suggestive QTL with effects on daily gain, feed conversion, and feeding behavior traits were also located. The significant QTL lies close to a previously identified mutation in the insulin-like growth factor 2 gene (IGF2) that affects carcass composition traits, although the IGF2 mutation is not segregating in the populations analyzed in the current study. Therefore, a distinct causal variant may exist on the P arm of SSC2 with an effect on feed intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald AL, Haley CS, Brown JF, Couperwhite S, McQueen HA, et al. (1995) The PiGMaP consortium linkage map of the pig (sus scrofa). Mamm Genome 6: 157–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bidanel JP, Rothschild M (2002) Current status of quantitative trait locus mapping in pigs. Pig News Inf 23: 39N–54N

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron ND, Curran MK, Thompson R (1988) Estimation of sire with feeding regime interaction in pigs. Anim Reprod 46: 87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138: 963–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Koning DJ, Janss LL, Rattink AP, van Oers PA, de Vries BJ, et al. (1999) Detection of quantitative trait loci for backfat thickness and intramuscular fat content in pigs (Susscrofd). Genetics 152: 1679–1690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edeal B, Rumph JM, Mass R, Killinger K, Jerez N, et al. (2000) Rapid communication: Linkage mapping of the mahogany (attractin) locus in cattle and pigs. J Anim Sci 78: 2479–2480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genstat Committee (2002) Genstat release 6.1 reference manual VSN Oxford: N International

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges M, (1999) Towards marker assisted selection in livestock. Reprod Nutr Dev 39: 555–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green P, Falls K, Crooks S (1990) Documentation for crimap, version 2.4 St. Louis: Washington University School of Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley CS, Agaro Ed’, Ellis M (1992) Genetic components of growth and ultrasonic fat depth traits in Meishan and Large White pigs and their reciprocal crosses. Anim Prod 54: 105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun Y, Ellis M, McKeith FK, Wilson ER (1997) Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. J Anim Sci 75: 1443–1451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knott SA, Marklund L, Haley CS, Andersson K, Davies W, et al. (1998) Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and Large White pigs. Genetics 149: 1069–1080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP Linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lander E, Kruglyak L (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: Guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11: 241–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee GJ, Archibald AL, Garth GB, Law AS, Nicholson D, et al. (2003). Detection of quantitative trait loci for locomotion and osteochondrosis-related traits in Large White × Meishan pigs. Anim Sci 76: 155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malek M, Marklund S, Dyer C, Matteri M, Rothschild M, (2000) Linkage and physical mapping of the porcine prepro-orexin gene. Mamm Genome 11: 342–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roehe R, Plastow GS, Knap PW (2003) Quantitative and molecular genetic determination of protein and fat deposition. Homo 54: 119–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer GA (2000) Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting birth characters and accumulation of backfat and weight in a meishan–white composite resource population. J Anim Sci 78:2547–2553

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer GA, Alexander LJ, Hu Z, Smith TP, Keele JW, et al. (1996) A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Res 6: 371–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seaton G, Haley CS, Knott SA, Kearsey M, Visscher PM (2002) QTL express: Mapping quantitative trait loci in simple and complex pedigrees. Bioinformatics 18: 339–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laere AS, Nguyen M, Braunschweig M, Nezer C, Collette C, et al. (2003) A regulatory mutation in ifg2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature 425: 832–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walling GA, Archibald AL, Cattermole JA, Downing AC, Finlayson HA, et al. (1998) Mapping of quantitative trait loci on porcine chromosome 4. Anim Genet 29: 415–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb AJ (1998) Objectives and strategies in pig improvement: An applied perspective. J Dairy Sci 81 Suppl 2: 36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods SC, Seeley RJ (2000) Adiposity signals and the control of energy homeostasis. Nutrition 16: 894–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the staff at Dryden Farm (Roslin) for care of the animals and data collection. They thank Rosalie Waldron, Heather Finlayson, Alison Downing, and Jen Anderson for technical assistance. This project was supported through the LINK SLP program, with funding from DEFRA, MLC, Cotswold Pig Development Company Ltd., JSR Healthbred Ltd., Newsham Hybrid Pigs Ltd., Rattlerow Farms, and PIC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross D. Houston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houston, R.D., Haley, C.S., Archibald, A.L. et al. A QTL affecting daily feed intake maps to Chromosome 2 in pigs. Mamm Genome 16, 464–470 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-004-4026-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-004-4026-0

Keywords

Navigation