Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of pulmonary nodules with overlapping vs non-overlapping image reconstruction at spiral CT

  • Chest radiology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The aim of this study was to analyze whether overlapping image reconstruction increases numbers of pulmonary nodules detected at helical CT. Forty-eight helical CT scans (21with a slice thickness of 10 mm; 27 with a slice thickness of 5 mm) of patients with known pulmonary nodules were reconstructed both with overlapping and non-overlapping image reconstruction. Two readers recorded number and size of pulmonary nodules as well as diagnostic confidence. With overlapping image reconstruction each reader diagnosed more pulmonary nodules (slice thickness 10 mm: +24.0 and +26.7 %, both p < 0.01; slice thickness 5 mm: +9.5 and +11.9 %, both not significant) and more “definite” nodules (slice thickness 10 mm: +20.3 %, p < 0.05, and +30.8 %, p < 0.005; slice thickness 5 mm: +18.0 and +17.0 %, both p < 0.05). Nodules diagnosed with overlapping image reconstruction only were almost exclusively smaller than the slice thickness. The increase in number of nodules detected was not associated with a decrease in diagnostic confidence. Overlapping image reconstruction improves detection of pulmonary nodules smaller than the slice thickness at spiral CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 8 April 1998; Revision received: 16 July 1998; Accepted: 9 September 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diederich, S., Lentschig, M., Winter, F. et al. Detection of pulmonary nodules with overlapping vs non-overlapping image reconstruction at spiral CT. Eur Radiol 9, 281–286 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050668

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050668

Navigation