Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of squamous cell carcinoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the palatine tonsil

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Accurate preoperative differentiation between squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in the palatine tonsil is crucial because of their different treatment. This study aimed to construct and validate a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT)–based radiomics nomogram for preoperative differentiation of SCC and NHL in the palatine tonsil.

Methods

This study enrolled 135 patients with a pathological diagnosis of SCC or NHL from two clinical centers, who were divided into training (n = 94; SCC = 50, NHL = 44) and external validation sets (n = 41; SCC = 22, NHL = 19). A radiomics signature was constructed from radiomics features extracted from routine CECT images and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. A clinical model was established using demographic features and CT findings. The independent clinical factors and Rad-score were combined to construct a radiomics nomogram. Performance of the clinical model, radiomics signature, and nomogram was assessed using receiver operating characteristics analysis and decision curve analysis.

Results

Eleven features were finally selected to construct the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram incorporating gender, mean CECT value, and radiomics signature showed better predictive value for differentiating SCC from NHL than the clinical model for training (AUC, 0.919 vs. 0.801, p = 0.004) and validation (AUC, 0.876 vs. 0.703, p = 0.029) sets. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the radiomics nomogram was more clinically useful than the clinical model.

Conclusions

A CECT-based radiomics nomogram was constructed incorporating gender, mean CECT value, and radiomics signature. This nomogram showed favorable predictive efficacy for differentiating SCC from NHL in the palatine tonsil, and might be useful for clinical decision-making.

Key Points

Differential diagnosis between SCC and NHL in the palatine tonsil is difficult by conventional imaging modalities.

A radiomics nomogram integrated with the radiomics signature, gender, and mean contrast-enhanced CT value facilitates differentiation of SCC from NHL with improved diagnostic efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

3D:

Three dimensional

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

AUC:

Area under the curve

CECT:

Contrast-enhanced CT

CI:

Confidence interval

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

GLCM:

Gray level co-occurrence matrix

GLDM:

Gray level dependence matrix

GLRLM:

Gray level run length matrix

GLSZM:

Gray level size zone matrix

HPV:

Human papilloma virus

ICC:

Inter-/intra-class correlation coefficient

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

NGTDM:

Neighbouring gray tone difference matrix

NHL:

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Nomo-score:

Nomogram score

Rad-score:

Radiomics score

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristics

SCC:

Squamous cell carcinoma

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Urquhart AC, Hutchins LG, Berg RL (2002) Distinguishing non-Hodgkin lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma tumors of the head and neck by computed tomography parameters. Laryngoscope 112:1079–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park M, Kim J, Choi YS et al (2016) Application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma and malignant lymphoma of the oropharynx. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. King AD, Lei KI, Richards PS, Ahuja AT (2003) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the nasopharynx: CT and MR imaging. Clin Radiol 58:621–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ichikawa Y, Sumi M, Sasaki M, Sumi T, Nakamura T (2012) Efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas of the nasopharynx and oropharynx: correlations of apparent diffusion coefficients and histologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:761–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Asaumi J, Yanagi Y, Konouchi H, Hisatomi M, Matsuzaki H, Kishi K (2004) Application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate malignant lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Oral Oncol 40:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song C, Cheng P, Cheng J et al (2020) Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal lymphoma based on DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI. Eur Radiol 30:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buch K, Fujita A, Li B, Kawashima Y, Qureshi MM, Sakai O (2015) Using texture analysis to determine human papillomavirus status of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas on CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:1343–1348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng YM, Xu WJ, Hao DP et al (2020) A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of lympho-associated benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07421-4

  10. Zheng YM, Li J, Liu S et al (2020) MRI-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07483-4

  11. Zhang H, Wang H, Hao D et al (2021) An MRI-based radiomic nomogram for discrimination between malignant and benign sinonasal tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O’Sullivan B et al (2017) Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:122–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Armitage JO (2005) Staging non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CA Cancer J Clin 55:368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Depeursinge A, Foncubierta-Rodriguez A, Van De Ville D, Muller H (2014) Three-dimensional solid texture analysis in biomedical imaging: review and opportunities. Med Image Anal 18:176–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alhamzawi R, Ali HTM (2018) The Bayesian adaptive lasso regression. Math Biosci 303:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kato H, Kanematsu M, Kawaguchi S, Watanabe H, Mizuta K, Aoki M (2013) Evaluation of imaging findings differentiating extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma in naso- and oropharynx. Clin Imaging 37:657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cho KS, Kang DW, Kim HJ, Lee JK, Roh HJ (2012) Differential diagnosis of primary nasopharyngeal lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma focusing on CT, MRI, and PET/CT. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146:574–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bae S, Choi YS, Sohn B et al (2020) Squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoma of the oropharynx: differentiation using a radiomics approach. Yonsei Med J 61:895–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guay ME, Lavertu P (1995) Tonsillar carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 252:259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, Maier SE, Takeda K (2005) Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1186–1192

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sumi M, Nakamura T (2009) Diagnostic importance of focal defects in the apparent diffusion coefficient-based differentiation between lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma nodes in the neck. Eur Radiol 19:975–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fong D, Bhatia KS, Yeung D, King AD (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, head and neck lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma at the primary site. Oral Oncol 46:603–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sumi M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T (2007) Diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficients for lymphomas and carcinomas in the pharynx. Eur Radiol 17:2631–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu W, Ye J, Wang Q, Luo J, Xu S (2019) CT-based radiomics signature for the preoperative discrimination between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma grades. Front Oncol 9:821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen L, Wang H, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Ma X (2020) Evaluation of CT-based radiomics signature and nomogram as prognostic markers in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 20:28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barigye SJ, Garcia de la Vega JM, Castillo-Garit JA (2019) Undersampling: case studies of flaviviral inhibitory activities. J Comput Aided Mol Des 33:997–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB et al (2015) Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 162:W1–W73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Karl Embleton, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This study has received funding from the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020MH286).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da-peng Hao.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Da-peng Hao.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors (Jian Li) has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Diagnostic or prognostic study

• Multi-center study

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(XLSX 1496 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 74 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, C., Zheng, Ym., Li, J. et al. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of squamous cell carcinoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the palatine tonsil. Eur Radiol 32, 243–253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08153-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08153-9

Keywords

Navigation