Abstract
We evaluated the diagnostic ability of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas in the pharynx and between carcinomas with different histological types in the pharynx. T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed on 14 patients with pharyngeal lymphomas, 26 patients with carcinomas of the pharynx, 5 patients with adenoidal hypertrophy, and 22 patients with normal tonsils. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were determined by using two b factors (500 and 1,000 s/mm2). The ADCs of lymphomas were significantly smaller (0.454 ± 0.075 × 10−3 mm2/s) than those of carcinomas (0.863 ± 0.238 × 10−3 mm2/s). The ADCs of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas (0.691 ± 0.149 × 10−3 mm2/s) were significantly smaller than those of moderately differentiated and well-differentiated carcinomas (0.971 ± 0.221 × 10−3 mm2/s), but were significantly larger than those of lymphomas. When an ADC smaller than 0.560 × 10−3 mm2/s was used for predicting lymphomas, we obtained the highest accuracy of 96%, with 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity, 86% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. Therefore, ADC measurements effectively differentiate lymphomas from carcinomas in the pharynx and could be a useful adjunct to biopsy-based development of treatment planning.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Kimura Y, Sumi M, Ichikawa Y, Kawai Y, Nakamura T (2005) Volumetric MR imaging of oral, maxillary sinus, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers: correlation between tumor volume and lymph node metastasis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2384–2389
Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H (1999) Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 210:617–623
Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Nakamura T (2006) MR microimaging of benign and malignant nodes in the neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:749–757
Hayashida Y, Yakushiji T, Awai K et al (2006) Monitoring therapeutic responses of primary bone tumors by diffusion-weighted image: initial results. Eur Radiol 16(12):2637–2643
Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F et al (2006) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for urinary bladder carcinoma: initial results. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-006-0281-7
Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A (2006) Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur radiol 16:1468–1477
Koeller KK, Rushing EJ (2003) Medulloblastoma: a comprehensive review with radiographic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23:1613–1637
Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, Maier SE, Takeda K (2005) Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1186–1192
Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F et al (2001) Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 220:621–630
Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, Provenzale JM (2002) Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology 224:177–183
Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M (1986) MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 161:401–407
Cooper RL, Chang DB, Young AC, Martin CJ, Ancker-Johnson B (1974) Restricted diffusion in biophysical systems. Biophys J 14:161–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sumi, M., Ichikawa, Y. & Nakamura, T. Diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficients for lymphomas and carcinomas in the pharynx. Eur Radiol 17, 2631–2637 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0588-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0588-z