Skip to main content
Log in

Does coronary calcium scoring with a SCORE better predict significant coronary artery stenosis than without? Correlation with computed tomography coronary angiography

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine effectiveness of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) alone and combined with Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in adult patients for significant coronary artery stenosis by using computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) as reference standard.

Methods

Two thousand twenty-one patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CACS test and CTCA. Patients were examined with dual-source CT and were grouped according to their age, gender, CACS, and estimated SCORE risk. Coronary plaque existence and degree of stenosis were assessed with CTCA. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves were analyzed.

Results

CACS was the single independent variable in estimating relative risk of critical stenosis and had superior outcome when compared with SCORE risk in logistic regression and ROC curve. Area under the ROC curve was greatest in the interval between 50-59 years. When SCORE was combined with CACS in patients with zero CACS, percentage of significant stenosis increased from 1.4% to 7.0% in patients with high or very high SCORE risk, and decreased to 0.9 % in patients with low or moderate SCORE risk.

Conclusions

CACS combination with SCORE risk predicts coronary artery stenosis. When CACS is zero, CTCA can be performed in patients with high or very high SCORE risk.

Key Points

CACS is the major predictor of significant stenosis in the sixth and seventh decade.

CACS has superior outcome when compared with SCORE.

Zero CACS is the most important negative predictor for significant CAS.

Zero CACS, with SCORE better predicts significant CAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CTCA:

Computed tomography coronary angiography

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CACS:

Coronary artery calcium score

SCORE:

Systematic coronary risk evaluation

CAS:

Coronary artery stenosis

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

References

  1. Rubinshtein R, Gaspar T, Halon DA, Goldstein J, Peled N, Lewis BS (2007) Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. Am J Cardiol 99:472–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sosnowski M, Pysz P, Szymanski L, Gola A, Tendera M (2011) Negative calcium score and the presence of obstructive coronary lesions in patients with intermediate CAD probability. Int J Cardiol 148:e16–e18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Aytemir K et al (2012) Cardiovascular risk and coronary atherosclerotic plaques detected by multidetector computed tomography: Framingham and SCORE risk models underestimate coronary atherosclerosis in the symptomatic low-risk Turkish population. Coron Artery Dis 23:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Malley PG, Taylor AJ, Jackson JL, Doherty TM, Detrano RC (2000) Prognostic value of coronary electron-beam computed tomography for coronary heart disease events in asymptomatic populations. Am J Cardiol 85:945–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. European Association for Cardiovascular P, Rehabilitation, Z R et al (2011) ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 32:1769–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A et al (2001) Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1430–1435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM et al (1999) Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults. Circulation 99:2633–2638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A et al (2003) Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation 107:2571–2576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC (2004) Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291:210–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shemesh J, Apter S, Itzchak Y, Motro M (2003) Coronary calcification compared in patients with acute versus in those with chronic coronary events by using dual-sector spiral CT. Radiology 226:483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Newstein D, Guerci AD (2000) Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1253–1260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ (2003) Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology 228:826–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM, Kessler KM, Castellanos A (1997) Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol 80:10F–19F

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raggi P, Cooil B, Shaw LJ et al (2003) Progression of coronary calcium on serial electron beam tomographic scanning is greater in patients with future myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 92:827–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong ND, Hsu JC, Detrano RC, Diamond G, Eisenberg H, Gardin JM (2000) Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events. Am J Cardiol 86:495–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ et al (2009) Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:692–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng VY, Lepor NE, Madyoon H, Eshaghian S, Naraghi AL, Shah PK (2007) Presence and severity of noncalcified coronary plaque on 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with zero and low coronary artery calcium. Am J Cardiol 99:1183–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoo DH, Chun EJ, Choi SI et al (2011) Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(Suppl 1):27–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Deniz Akata MD, Professor. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Prof. Ergun Karaağaoğlu and Jale Karakaya kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was not required for this study because it was a retrospective study. Methodology: retrospective, cross sectional study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deniz Akata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durhan, G., Hazırolan, T., Sunman, H. et al. Does coronary calcium scoring with a SCORE better predict significant coronary artery stenosis than without? Correlation with computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 25, 776–784 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3477-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3477-2

Keywords

Navigation