Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coronary artery calcium score and CT angiography in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the role of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and/or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight consecutive asymptomatic elderly (>65 years) subjects who had a high pretest probability and underwent CACS/CCTA were included. Each CCTA was evaluated for adequacy for assessment of coronary stenosis. Significant stenosis (>50 % diameter narrowing) was assessed on evaluable CT images and by invasive catheter angiography (ICA).

Results

All subjects were men with mean CACS of 880 ± 1779. Among those with low (0–99), intermediate (100–399), and high (400–999) CACS, ICA-verified significant stenosis was present in 8 % (1/13), 23 % (2/13), and 67 % (8/12), respectively. Among those with very high CACS (≥1000) (n = 10), 90 % of CCTAs were not evaluable for stenosis.

Conclusion

In asymptomatic elderly subjects with high pretest probability, CACS followed by CCTA may be considered for those with intermediate to high CACS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CACS:

Coronary artery calcium scoring

CTA:

Computed tomography angiography

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CCTA:

Coronary computed tomography angiography

DCS:

Duke clinical score

ICA:

Invasive catheter angiography

SD:

Standard deviation

DFM:

Diamond and Forrester method

References

  1. Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, Hofman KJ. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA. 2004;291(21):2616–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(21):1724–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(22):2324–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel MR, Bailey SR, Bonow RO, Chambers CE, Chan PS, Dehmer GJ, et al. ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):39–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O’Gara P, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. 2010;122(21):e525–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pryor DB, Shaw L, McCants CB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(2):81–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Institutes of Health. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) Final report. September 2002.

  8. Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(5B):10F–9F.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferket BS, Genders TS, Colkesen EB, Visser JJ, Spronk S, Steyerberg EW, et al. Systematic review of guidelines on imaging of asymptomatic coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(15):1591–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ronan G, Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21(1):192–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB Jr, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110(2):227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennie CJ, Leipsic J, Brydie A. Canadian Association of Radiologists: consensus guidelines and standards for cardiac CT. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2009;60(1):19–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow BJ, Larose E, Bilodeau S, Ellins ML, Galiwango P, Kass M, et al. The ʻwhat, when, where, who and how?ʼ of cardiac computed tomography in 2009: guidelines for the clinician. Can J Cardio. 2009;25(3):135–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Chang SA, Chun EJ, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(5):357–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ha EJ, Kim Y, Cheung JY, Shim SS. Coronary artery disease in asymptomatic young adults: its prevalence according to coronary artery disease risk stratification and the CT characteristics. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(4):425–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang Y, Kim Y, Chung IM, Ryu J, Park H. Coronary heart disease risk assessment and characterization of coronary artery disease using coronary CT angiography: comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(8):601–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kornowski R, Bachar GN, Dvir D, Fuchs S, Atar E. Angiographic findings and clinical outcomes in asymptomatic patients with severe obstructive atherosclerosis on computed tomography angiography. Isr Med Assoc J. 2008;10(8–9):627–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maffei E, Palumbo A, Martini C, Tedeschi C, Arcadi T, La Grutta L, et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients. La Radiologia medica. 2011;116(8):1161–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Romeo F, Leo R, Clementi F, Razzini C, Borzi M, Martuscelli E, et al. Multislice computed tomography in an asymptomatic high-risk population. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(3):325–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Jukema JW, et al. Different manifestations of coronary artery disease by stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary calcium scoring, and multislice CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15(4):503–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeina AR, Odeh M, Rosenschein U, Zaid G, Barmeir E. Coronary artery disease among asymptomatic diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. Coron Artery Dis. 2008;19(1):37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho I, Min HS, Chun EJ, Park SK, Choi Y, Blumenthal RS, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis detected by coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic subjects with early chronic kidney disease. Atherosclerosis. 2010;208(2):406–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lubanski MS, Vanhecke TE, Chinnaiyan KM, Franklin BA, McCullough PA. Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis identified by coronary computed tomographic angiography in asymptomatic morbidly obese patients. Heart Int. 2010;5(2):e15.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Choi EK, Yoon YE, Chun EJ, Choi SI, et al. Detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus using non-invasive cardiac angiography. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203(2):442–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leem J, Hee Koh E, Jeong E, Jang JE, Lee SW, Kang JW, et al. Prevalence of angiographically defined obstructive coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes according to the coronary calcium score. Intern Med. 2012;51(21):3017–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee BC, Lee WJ, Hsu HC, Chien KL, Shih TT, Chen MF. Using clinical cardiovascular risk scores to predict coronary artery plaque severity and stenosis detected by CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic Chinese subjects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27(5):669–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plank F, Friedrich G, Dichtl W, Klauser A, Jaschke W, Franz WM, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in asymptomatic high-risk patients: a cohort study. Open Heart. 2014;1(1):e000096.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Anand DV, Lim E, Hopkins D, Corder R, Shaw LJ, Sharp P, et al. Risk stratification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes: prospective evaluation of the combined use of coronary artery calcium imaging and selective myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(6):713–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(1):158–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(4):1253–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, Devries SS, et al. Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation. 2003;107(20):2571–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(10):1931–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Raggi P, Cooil B, Callister TQ. Use of electron beam tomography data to develop models for prediction of hard coronary events. Am Heart J. 2001;141(3):375–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(9):1663–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I, Cao F, Brazaitis M, OʼMalley PG. Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(5):807–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Oei HH, van Dijck W, van Rooij FJ, et al. Coronary calcification improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the elderly. Circulation. 2005;112(4):572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2004;291(2):210–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24(5):535–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bedayat A, Rybicki FJ, Kumamaru K, Powers SL, Signorelli J, Steigner ML, et al. Reduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(2):381–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fujimoto S, Matsutani H, Kondo T, Sano T, Kumamaru K, Takase S, et al. Image quality and radiation dose stratified by patient heart rate for coronary 64- and 320-MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(4):765–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McCollough C CD, Edyvean S, et al. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT, report of AAPM Task Group 23: CT Dosimetry Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. http://www.aapmorg/pubs/reports/RPT_96pdf. 2008.

  43. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51(4 Suppl):5–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ackermann PW, Hart DA. Influence of comorbidities: neuropathy, vasculopathy, and diabetes on healing response quality. Adv Wound Care. 2013;2(8):410–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cuaderes E, Lamb WL, Alger A. The older adult with diabetes: peripheral neuropathy and walking for health. Nurs Clin North Am. 2014;49(2):171–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300(24):1350–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wasfy MM, Brady TJ, Abbara S, Nasir K, Ghoshhajra BB, Truong QA, et al. Comparison of the Diamond-Forrester method and Duke clinical score to predict obstructive coronary artery disease by computed tomographic angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(7):998–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cho I, Chang HJ, Oh B, Shin S, Sung JM, Lin FY, et al. Incremental prognostic utility of coronary CT angiography for asymptomatic patients based upon extent and severity of coronary artery calcium: results from the Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes International Multicenter (CONFIRM) study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(8):501–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanako K. Kumamaru.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Frank J. Rybicki has a research agreement with Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation that is unrelated to this project. No conflict of interest for all other authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imanzadeh, A., George, E., Kondo, T. et al. Coronary artery calcium score and CT angiography in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease. Jpn J Radiol 34, 140–147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0506-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0506-2

Keywords

Navigation