Skip to main content
Log in

How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate malignant from benign myometrial tumours.

Methods

Fifty-one women underwent MRI before surgery for evaluation of a solitary myometrial tumour. At histopathology, there were 25 uncertain or malignant mesenchymal tumours and 26 benign leiomyomas. Conventional morphological MRI criteria were recorded in addition to b 1,000 signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for each criterion. A multivariate analysis was performed to construct an interpretation model.

Results

The significant criteria for prediction of malignancy were high b 1,000 signal intensity (OR = +∞), intermediate T2-weighted signal intensity (OR = +∞), mean ADC (OR = 25.1), patient age (OR = 20.1), intra-tumoral haemorrhage (OR = 21.35), endometrial thickening (OR = 11), T2-weighted signal heterogeneity (OR = 10.2), menopausal status (OR = 9.7), heterogeneous enhancement (OR = 8) and non-myometrial origin on MRI (OR = 4.9). In the recursive partitioning model, using b 1,000 signal intensity, T2 signal intensity, mean ADC, and patient age, the model correctly classified benign and malignant tumours in 47 of the 51 cases (92.4 %).

Conclusion

We have developed an interpretation model usable in routine practice for myometrial tumours discovered at MRI including T2 signal, b 1,000 signal and ADC measurement.

Key Points

MRI is widely used to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours.

By combining T2-weighted, b 1,000 and ADC features, MRI is 92.4 % accurate.

DWI may limit misdiagnoses of uterine sarcoma as benign leiomyoma.

Patient age is important when considering a solitary myometrial tumour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF et al (2012) Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization. Radiographics 32:E251–E281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gambadauro P (2012) Dealing with uterine fibroids in reproductive medicine. J Obstet Gynaecol 32:210–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marret H, Fritel X, Ouldamer L et al (2012) Therapeutic management of uterine fibroid tumors: updated French guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165:156–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorny KR, Woodrum DA, Brown DL et al (2011) Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas: review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:857–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu TI, Yen TC, Lai CH (2011) Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25:681–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Bosch T, Coosemans A, Morina M et al (2012) Screening for uterine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26:257–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I et al (2001) MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1307–1311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I et al (1999) Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 19 Spec No: S131-S145

  9. Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T et al (2008) The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 18:723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Awai K et al (2009) Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 19:2756–2764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomassin-Naggara I, Cuenod CA, Darai E et al (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of ovarian neoplasms: current status and future perspectives. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:661–72, ix

    Google Scholar 

  12. James KE, White RF, Kraemer HC (2005) Repeated split sample validation to assess logistic regression and recursive partitioning: an application to the prediction of cognitive impairment. Stat Med 24:3019–3035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA et al (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK et al (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 19:1179–1197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pelage JP, Cazejust J, Pluot E et al (2005) Uterine fibroid vascularization and clinical relevance to uterine fibroid embolization. Radiographics 25:S99–S117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomassin-Naggara, I., Dechoux, S., Bonneau, C. et al. How to differentiate benign from malignant myometrial tumours using MR imaging. Eur Radiol 23, 2306–2314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2819-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2819-9

Keywords

Navigation