Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of urinary stones in the presence of iodinated contrast medium using dual-energy CT: a phantom study

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To develop a dual-energy CT (DECT) method for differentiating uric acid (UA) from non-UA stones in the presence of iodinated contrast medium.

Methods

Thirty UA and 45 non-UA stones were selected after infra-red spectroscopic analysis and independently placed in a 1.5-ml vial, which was filled first with saline and then with increasing concentrations of iodine. For each condition, tubes were put in a 35-cm water phantom and examined using a dual-source CT system at 100 and 140 kV. Virtual unenhanced images created from CT data sets of the stones in iodine-containing solutions provided position and volume information. This map was used to calculate a CT number ratio to differentiate stone type. A region-growing method was developed to improve the ability to differentiate between UA and non-UA stones with iodinated contrast medium.

Results

The sensitivity for detecting UA stones was 100 % for unenhanced images but fell to 18 % with 20 mgI/ml iodine solution and 0 % for higher concentrations. With region growing, the sensitivity for detecting UA stones was increased to 100 %, 82 %, 57 %, 50 % and 21 % for iodine solutions of 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mgI/ml.

Conclusion

The region-growing method improves differentiation of UA from non-UA stones on contrast-enhanced DECT urograms.

Key Points

Computed tomography is widely used to assess renal tract calculi

Dual-energy CT can assess stone composition and provide virtual unenhanced images

However, iodinated contrast medium affects the volume estimation for urinary stones.

CTR of stones is altered by the surrounding iodine in CT urograms.

The region-growing method improves the identification of uric acid stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

computed tomography

DECT:

dual-energy computed tomography

UA:

uric acid

CYS:

cystine

COX:

calcium oxalate

APA:

calcium hydroxyapatite

CTR:

CT number ratio

References

  1. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA et al (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fielding JR, Steele G, Fox LA, Heller H, Loughlin KR (1997) Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. J Endourol 157:2071–2073

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams JC, Kim SC, Zarse CA, Mcateer JA, Lingeman JE (2004) Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol 18:937–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vrtiska T (2005) Quantitation of stone burden: imaging advances. Urol Res 33:398–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demehri S, Kalra MK, Rybicki FJ et al (2011) Quantification of urinary stone volume: attenuation threshold–based CT method—a technical note. Radiology 258:915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. J Urol 55:816–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellin M-F, Renard-Penna R, Conort P et al (2004) Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT-attenuation values and density. Eur Radiol 14:2134–2140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Gnessin E, Evan AP (2009) Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique. Nat Rev Urol 6:660–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ et al (2007) Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol 14:1441–1447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grosjean R, Sauer B, Guerra RM et al (2008) Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:720–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas C, Patschan O, Ketelsen D et al (2009) Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol. Eur Radiol 19:1553–1559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK et al (2009) Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition—pilot study. Radiology 250:813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M et al (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction. Radiology 257:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2010) Characterization of urinary stones with dual-energy CT: improved differentiation using a tin filter. Invest Radiol 45:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Qu M, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Leng S et al (2011) Dual-energy dual-source CT with additional spectral filtration can improve the differentiation of non-uric acid renal stones: an ex vivo phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1279–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eiber M, Holzapfel K, Frimberger M et al (2012) Targeted dual-energy single-source CT for characterisation of urinary calculi: experimental and clinical experience. Eur Radiol 22:251–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alvarez RE, Macovski A (1976) Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography. Phys Med Biol 21:733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelcz F, Joseph PM, Hilal SK (1979) Noise considerations in dual energy CT scanning. Med Phys 6:418–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T et al (2007) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease. Invest Radiol 42:823–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi N, Hartman RP, Vrtiska TJ et al (2008) Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1169–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A et al (2010) Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology 256:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moon JW, Park BK, Kim CK, Park SY (2011) Evaluation of virtual unenhanced CT obtained from dual-energy CT urography for detecting urinary stones. Br J Radiol. doi:10.1259/bjr/19566194

  23. Qu M, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Wang J et al (2010) Advanced dual-energy image processing algorithm to improve the discrimination of renal stones in phantoms of large size patients using dual-energy dual-source CT RSNA, Chicago, IL

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NIH grant nos. DK83007 and DK59933. The authors would like to thank Kristina Nunez for her assistance with manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Wang.

Appendix

Appendix

After the stone was segmented from the background soft tissue structures using the commercial virtual unenhanced technique, a binary map of stone position was applied to the CTR image (CTR = CT_low kV/CT_high kV). For each stone, the centre slice along the z direction was used to determine the starting point of the region-growing iterative process (Fig. A1a). First, an internal region was acquired by performing a four-pixel by four-pixel area of erosion on the CTR map of the centre slice. Then, the pixel with the closest CTR value to the average CTR of the internal region was chosen as the starting point (the seed). Starting from the seed, the nearest 26 neighbouring pixels were searched (Fig. A1b) in an iterative process (Fig. A2) to find all pixels that had CTR values within a certain range relative to the mean CTR of the stone. The width of the range is the only parameter to be defined before the iteration. Here 0.2 (± 0.1) was used for all stones at all five iodine concentrations. As shown in Fig. A2, the mean CTR was updated at each iteration and, as more pixels were included, it was expected to approach the true CTR of the stone, with those pixels affected by iodinated contrast medium (far away from the centre) excluded.

Fig. A1
figure 5

a A CTR map of a uric acid stone immersed in iodine solution. The red dot in the centre represents the starting point of the region-growing iterative process. b The 26 neighbouring pixels of the starting point

Fig. A2
figure 6

The iterated steps of the region-growing method

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Qu, M., Duan, X. et al. Characterisation of urinary stones in the presence of iodinated contrast medium using dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 22, 2589–2596 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2532-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2532-0

Keywords

Navigation