Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency and radiation dose of a low-dose dual-energy (DE) CT protocol for the evaluation of urinary calculus disease were evaluated. A low-dose dual-source DE-CT renal calculi protocol (140 kV, 46 mAs; 80 kV, 210 mAs) was derived from the single-energy (SE) CT protocol used in our institution for the detection of renal calculi (120 kV, 75 mAs). An Alderson-Rando phantom was equipped with thermoluminescence dosimeters and examined by CT with both protocols. The effective doses were calculated. Fifty-one patients with suspected or known urinary calculus disease underwent DE-CT. DE analysis was performed if calculi were detected using a dedicated software tool. Results were compared to chemical analysis after invasive calculus extraction. An effective dose of 3.43 mSv (male) and 5.30 mSv (female) was measured in the phantom for the DE protocol (vs. 3.17/4.57 mSv for the SE protocol). Urinary calculi were found in 34 patients; in 28 patients, calculi were removed and analyzed (23 patients with calcified calculi, three with uric acid calculi, one with 2,8-dihyxdroxyadenine-calculi, one patient with a mixed struvite calculus). DE analysis was able to distinguish between calcified and non-calcified calculi in all cases. In conclusion, dual-energy urinary calculus analysis is effective also with a low-dose protocol. The protocol tested in this study reliably identified calcified urinary calculi in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saita A, Bonaccorsi A, Motta M (2007) Stone composition: where do we stand. Urol Int 79 Suppl 1:16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM et al (1979) Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int 16:624–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC (2002) Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:101–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52:1610–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deveci S, Coskun M, Tekin MI et al (2004) Spiral computed tomography: role in determination of chemical compositions of pure and mixed urinary stones–an in vitro study. Urology 64:237–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heneghan JP, McGuire KA, Leder RA et al (2003) Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. Radiology 229:575–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawashima A, Vrtiska TJ, LeRoy AJ et al (2004) CT urography. Radiographics 24 Suppl 1:S35–54 discussion S55-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalra MK, Maher MM, D’Souza RV et al (2005) Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology 235:523–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159:673–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheir KZ, Mansour O, Madbouly K et al (2005) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography. Urol Res 33:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C et al (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58:170–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitcheson HD, Zamenhof RG, Bankoff MS et al (1983) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. J Urol 130:814–819

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M et al (2008) Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol 43:112–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grosjean R, Sauer B, Guerra RM et al (2008) Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:720–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Rentsch K et al (2008) Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation. Urol Res 36:133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys 47:463–467

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1991) The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposure Using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods. Part VI: Organ Doses from Computed Tomographic Examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91. GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Oberschleißheim

    Google Scholar 

  19. Protection ICoR (1991) Recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60 Oxford. Pergamon Press

  20. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW et al (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 46:756–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Coe FL, Evan A, Worcester E (2005) Kidney stone disease. J Clin Invest 115:2598–2608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    C. Thomas, D. Ketelsen, I. Tsiflikas, A. Reimann, H. Brodoefel, C. Claussen, A. Kopp, M. Heuschmid & H.-P. Schlemmer

  2. Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    O. Patschan, U. Nagele & A. Stenzl

  3. Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    M. Buchgeister

  4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    C. Thomas

Authors
  1. C. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Patschan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Ketelsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Tsiflikas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Reimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Brodoefel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Buchgeister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. U. Nagele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Stenzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C. Claussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. A. Kopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. M. Heuschmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. H.-P. Schlemmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, C., Patschan, O., Ketelsen, D. et al. Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol. Eur Radiol 19, 1553–1559 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1300-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1300-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation