Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), dual energy CT (DECT) and conventional single-source spiral CT (SCT) for pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) on a 128-slice CT system.

Methods

Pulmonary CTA was performed with five protocols: high-pitch DSCT (100 kV), high-pitch DSCT (120 kV), DECT (100/140 kV), SCT (100 kV), and SCT (120 kV). For each protocol, 30 sex, age, and body-mass-index (mean 25.3 kg/m2) matched patients were identified. Retrospectively, two observers subjectively assessed image quality, measured CT attenuation (HU±SD) at seven central and peripheral levels, and calculated signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Radiation exposure parameters (CTDIvol and DLP) were compared.

Results

Subjective image quality was rated good to excellent in >92% (>138/150) with an interobserver agreement of 91.4%. The five protocols did not significantly differ in image quality, neither by subjective, nor by objective measures (SNR, CNR). By contrast, radiation exposure differed between protocols: significant lower radiation was achieved by using high-pitch DSCT at 100 kV (p < 0.01 in all). Radiation exposure of DECT was in between SCT at 100 kV and 120 kV.

Conclusions

SCT, high-pitch DSCT, and DECT protocols techniques result in similar subjective and objective image quality, but radiation exposure was significantly lower with high-pitch DSCT at 100 kV.

Key Points

  • New CT protocols show promising results in pulmonary embolism assessment.

  • High-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT) at 100 kV provides radiation dose savings for pulmonary CTA.

  • High-pitch DSCT at 100 kV maintains diagnostic image quality for pulmonary CTA.

  • Dual energy CT uses more radiation but also provides lung perfusion evaluation.

  • Whether the additional perfusion data is worth the extra radiation remains undetermined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, Gefter WB, Gottschalk A, Mayo JR, Sostman HD (2007) Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 245:315–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qanadli SD, Hajjam ME, Mesurolle B et al (2000) Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology 217:447–455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS et al (2004) Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology 233:806–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR et al (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354:2317–2327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flohr TG, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K et al (2008) Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a dual source CT scanner. Med Phys 35:5882–5897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B et al (2008) Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol 68:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sommer WH, Schenzle JC, Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Graser A, Michalski G, Neumaier K, Reiser MF, Johnson TR (2010) Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique. Invest Radiol 45:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson TRC, Krauss B, Sedlmair M et al (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 17:1510–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferda J, Flohr T, Kreuzberg B (2008) Tissue imaging with dual-energy computed tomography—initial clinical experience. Ces Radiol 62:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fink C, Johnson TR, Michaely HJ et al (2008) Dual-energy CT angiography of the lung in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: initial results. Rofo 180:879–883

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pontana F, Faivre JB, Remy-Jardin M et al (2008) Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. Acad Radiol 15:1494–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thieme SF, Becker CR, Hacker M, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Johnson TR (2008) Dual energy CT for the assessment of lung perfusion–correlation to scintigraphy. Eur J Radiol 68:369–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoey ET, Gopalan D, Ganesh V et al (2009) Dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography: a novel technique for assessing acute and chronic pulmonary thromboembolism. Clin Radiol 64:414–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chae EJ, Seo JB, Jang YM, Krauss B, Lee CW, Lee HJ, Song KS (2010) Dual-energy CT for assessment of the severity of acute pulmonary embolism: pulmonary perfusion defect score compared with CT angiographic obstruction score and right ventricular/left ventricular diameter ratio. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:604–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Primak AN, Giraldo JCR, Eusemann CD, Schmidt B, Kantor B, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH (2010) Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1164–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. International Commission on Radiological Protection and Measurements. Radiological protection and safety. International Commission on Radiological Protection Measurements publication no. 60. Oxford, England: Pergamon, 1991

  17. Chae EJ, Song JW, Seo JB, Krauss B, Jang YM, Song KS (2008) Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience. Radiology 249:671–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flohr TG, Leng S, Yu L et al (2009) Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality. Med Phys 36:5641–5653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kristiansson M, Holmquist F, Nyman U (2010) Ultralow contrast medium doses at CT to diagnose pulmonary embolism in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 20:1321–1330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoellnast H, Deutschmann HA, Fritz GA, Stessel U, Schaffler GJ, Tillich M (2005) MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of iodine flow concentration on vessel attenuation and visualization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1935–1939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I et al (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far does multidetector–row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoepf UJ, Goldhaber SZ, Costello P (2004) Spiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109:2160–2167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coche E, Verschuren F, Keyeux A et al (2003) Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi– detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 229:757–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raptopoulos V, Boiselle PM (2001) Multi–detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single–detector row spiral CT. Radiology 221:606–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK et al (2002) Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi– detector row spiral CT. Radiology 222:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN (2003) Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi– detector row CT. Radiology 227:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brunot S, Corneloup O, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, Laurent F (2005) Reproducibility of multidetector spiral computed tomography in detection of subsegmental acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 15:2057–2063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schertler T, Scheffel H, Frauenfelder T, Desbiolles L, Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Seifert B, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Alkadhi H (2007) Dual-source computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain: feasibility and image quality. Eur Radiol 17:3179–3188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Valentin J (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schenzle JC, Sommer WH, Neumaier K, Michalski G, Lechel U, Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Reiser MF, Johnson TR (2010) Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose? Invest Radiol 45:347–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bauer RW, Kramer S, Renker M, Schell B, Larson MC, Beeres M, Lehnert T, Jacobi V, Vogl TJ, Kerl JM (2011) Dose and image quality at CT pulmonary angiography-comparison of first and second generation dual-energy CT and 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2162-y

  32. Bauer RW, Frellesen C, Renker M, Schell B, Lehnert T, Ackermann H, Schoepf UJ, Jacobi V, Vogl TJ, Kerl JM (2011) Dual energy CT pulmonary blood volume assessment in acute pulmonary embolism—correlation with D-dimer level, right heart strain and clinical outcome. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2135-1

  33. Björkdahl P, Nyman U (2010) Using 100- instead of 120-kVp computed tomography to diagnose pulmonary embolism almost halves the radiation dose with preserved diagnostic quality. Acta Radiol 51:260–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    Tobias De Zordo, Klemens von Lutterotti, Peter F. Soegner, Renate Frank, Friedrich Aigner, Andrea S. Klauser, Werner R. Jaschke & Gudrun M. Feuchtner

  2. Department of Rheumatology, Medical University Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria

    Christian Dejaco

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    Christoph Pechlaner

  4. Heart & Vascular Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA

    U. Joseph Schoepf

Authors
  1. Tobias De Zordo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Klemens von Lutterotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Dejaco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter F. Soegner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Renate Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Friedrich Aigner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrea S. Klauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christoph Pechlaner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. U. Joseph Schoepf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Werner R. Jaschke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gudrun M. Feuchtner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias De Zordo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Zordo, T., von Lutterotti, K., Dejaco, C. et al. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT. Eur Radiol 22, 279–286 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2251-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2251-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation