Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Significance of sagittal reformations in routine thoracic and abdominal multislice CT studies for detecting osteoporotic fractures and other spine abnormalities

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose was to assess osteoporotic vertebral fractures and other spinal lesions in sagittal reformations obtained from routine multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) studies of the thorax and abdomen, to compare sagittal reformations with axial images in detecting these lesions and to investigate how frequently they were missed in the official radiology report. Routine abdominal or thoracoabdominal MDCT using a standard protocol was performed in 112 postmenopausal women. Axial images and sagittal reformations were analyzed separately by two radiologists in consensus and were compared in order to evaluate how often spinal lesions could be detected. In addition the official radiology reports were assessed to determine how many of those abnormalities were identified. Spine abnormalities were visualized in 101/112 postmenopausal women. In 27 patients osteoporotic vertebral deformities were found; 6 of these were shown in the axial images, but none of these were diagnosed in the official radiology report. Additional abnormalities included degenerative disc disease, osteoarthritis of the facet joints, scoliosis, hemangiomas and bone metastases. In only 9/101 patients spine abnormalities were mentioned in the radiology report. Sagittal reformations of standard MDCT images provide important additional information on spinal abnormalities; in particular, osteoporotic vertebral deformities are substantially better detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim N, Rowe BH, Raymond G, Jen H, Colman I, Jackson SA, Siminoski KG, Chahal AM, Folk D, Majumdar SR (2004) Underreporting of vertebral fractures on routine chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(2):297–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gehlbach S, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood J (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Link TM, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Adams JE (2005) Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Eur Radiol 15(8):1521–1532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook NP, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Gennari C, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kiss C, Masaryk P, Naves M, Poor G, Raspe H, Reid DM, Reeve J, Stepan J, Todd C, Woolf AD, O, Neill TW (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(2):113–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Neill TW, Cockerill W, Matthis C, Raspe HH, Lunt M, Cooper C, Banzer D, Cannata JB, Naves M, Felsch B, Felsenberg D, Janott J, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kragl G, Lopes Vaz A, Lyritis G, Masaryk P, Poor G, Reid DM, Reisinger W, Scheidt-Nave C, Stepan JJ, Todd CJ, Woolf AD, Reeve J, Silman AJ (2004) Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 15(9):760–765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ensrud K, Thompson D, Cauley J, Nevitt M, Kado D, Hochberg M, Santora A2, Black D (2000) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:241–249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer JS, Muller D, Ambekar A, Dobritz M, Matsuura M, Eckstein F, Rummeny EJ, Link TM (2006) Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT. Osteoporos Int 17(4):608–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Schaller S, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Becker C, Schopf UJ, Bruning R, Reiser MF (1999) [The technical bases and uses of multi-slice CT]. Radiologe 39(11):923–931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mui LW, Haramati LB, Alterman DD, Haramati N, Zelefsky MN, Hamerman D (2003) Evaluation of vertebral fractures on lateral chest radiographs of inner-city postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 73(6):550–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Arch Intern Med 159(11):1215–1220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O, Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3(3):113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delmas PD, van de LL, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A, Cahall DL (2005) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 20(4):557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis the study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 11(7):984–996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller D, Isbary M, Boehm H, Bauer JS, Rummeny EJ, ink TM (2004) Recognition of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures on chest radiographs in postmenopausal women. RSNA Chicago, 2004, p 305

  18. Davies KM, Stegman MR, Heaney RP, Recker RR (1996) Prevalence and severity of vertebral fracture: the saunders county bone quality study. Osteoporos Int 6(2):160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johansson C, Mellstrom D, Rosengren K, Rundgren A (1993) Prevalence of vertebral fractures in 85-year-olds. Radiographic examination of 462 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand 64(1):25–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann intern Med 128(10):793–800

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfeilschifter J (2006) 2006 DVO-guideline for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of osteoporosis for women after menopause, for men after age 60 executive summary guidelines. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 114(10):611–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Majumdar SR, Kim N, Colman I, Chahal AM, Raymond G, Jen H, Siminoski KG, Hanley DA, Rowe BH (2005) Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition, and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 165(8):905–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pfeilschifter J, Diel I (2000) Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management. J Clin Oncol 18:1570–1593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Delmas PD, Genant HK, Crans GG, Stock JL, Wong M, Siris E, Adachi JD (2003) Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial. Bone 33(4):522–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Begemann PG, Kemper J, Gatzka C, Stork A, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G (2004) Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures: do we still have to read the transverse images? J Comput Assist Tomogr 28(4):572–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G, Schmitz-Rode T, Blaum M, Fabry U, Gunther RW (2002) Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(6):1429–1436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandrasegaran K, Rydberg J, Tann M, Hawes DR, Kopecky KK, Maglinte DD (2007) Benefits of routine use of coronal and sagittal reformations in multi-slice CT examination of the abdomen and pelvis. Clin Radiol 62(4):340–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD (2004) Disc space narrowing is associated with an increased vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women: the OFELY Study. J Bone Miner Res 19(12):1994–1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sornay-Rendu E, Allard C, Munoz F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD (2006) Disc space narrowing as a new risk factor for vertebral fracture: the OFELY study. Arthritis Rheum 54(4):1262–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roux C, Fechtenbaum J, Briot K, Cropet C, Liu-Leage S, Marcelli C (2007) Inverse relationship between vertebral fractures and spine osteoarthritis in post menopausal women with osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis. (Epub ahead of print) DOI 10.1136/ard.2007.069369

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the grant “Tandem-Projekt Osteoporose, Max-Planck-Society.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675, München, Germany

    Dirk Müller, Jan S. Bauer, Martin Zeile & Ernst J. Rummeny

  2. Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Thomas M. Link

Authors
  1. Dirk Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan S. Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Zeile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ernst J. Rummeny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas M. Link
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, D., Bauer, J.S., Zeile, M. et al. Significance of sagittal reformations in routine thoracic and abdominal multislice CT studies for detecting osteoporotic fractures and other spine abnormalities. Eur Radiol 18, 1696–1702 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0920-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0920-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation