Skip to main content
Log in

Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction?

  • Physics
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to estimate thyroid dose and the associated risk for thyroid cancer induction from common head and neck computed tomography (CT) examinations during childhood. The Monte Carlo N-particle transport code was employed to simulate the routine CT scanning of the brain, paranasal sinuses, inner ear and neck performed on sequential and/or spiral modes. The mean thyroid dose was calculated using mathematical phantoms representing a newborn infant and children of 1year, 5 years, 10 years and 15 years old. To verify Monte Carlo results, dose measurements were carried out on physical anthropomorphic phantoms using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). The scattered dose to thyroid from head CT examinations varied from 0.6 mGy to 8.7 mGy depending upon the scanned region, the pediatric patient’s age and the acquisition mode used. Primary irradiation of the thyroid gland during CT of the neck resulted in an absorbed dose range of 15.2–52.0 mGy. The mean difference between Monte Carlo calculations and TLD measurements was 11.8%. Thyroid exposure to scattered radiation from head CT scanning is associated with a low but not negligible risk of cancer induction of 4–65 per million patients. Neck CT can result in an increased risk for development of thyroid malignancies up to 390 per million patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP publication 87. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 60. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall EJ (2000) Radiobiology for the radiologist, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fearon T, Vunich J (1987) Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148:171–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zankl M, Panzer W, Petousi-Henb N, Drexler G (1995) Organ doses for children from computed tomographic examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 57:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Stratakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med Phys 32:1621–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boone JM, Seibert JA (1997) An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode X-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. Med Phys 24:1661–1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckerman KF, Cristy M, Ryman JC (1996) The ORNL mathematical phantom series. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siemens (2002) SOMATOM Sensation 16 application guide: routine protocols. Siemens, Forchheim

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1985) Induction of thyroid cancer by ionizing radiation. NCRP report 80. NCRP Publications: Bethesda, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Leidecker C, Suss C, Schmidt T, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH (2006) Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 16:1841–1846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Theocharopoulos N, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Karampekios S, Gourtsoyiannis N (2006) Dosimetric characteristics of a 16-slice computed tomography scanner. Eur Radiol Apr 22; [Epub ahead of print] DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0251-0

  15. Vock P (2005) CT dose reduction in children. Eur Radiol 15:2333–2340

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bacher K, Bogaert E, Lapere R, De Wolf D, Thierens H (2005) Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation 111:83–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazonakis M, Damilakis J, Raissaki M, Gourtsoyiannis N (2004) Radiation dose and cancer risk to children undergoing skull radiography. Pediatr Radiol 34:624–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perisinakis K, Raissaki M, Damilakis J, Stratakis J, Neratzoulakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2006) Fluoroscopy-controlled voiding cystourethrography in infants and children: are the radiation risks trivial? Eur Radiol 16:846–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michalis Mazonakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazonakis, M., Tzedakis, A., Damilakis, J. et al. Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction?. Eur Radiol 17, 1352–1357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0417-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0417-9

Keywords

Navigation