Skip to main content
Log in

Multidetector CT of the kidney

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technological development of multidetector CT offers new possibilities for better imaging of organic structures that can be used in diagnosis of the kidney. The thinner slices allow a better spatial resolution, and slice fusion allows improved contrast resolution. The isotropic voxel has been realized in the latest 64-channel scanners. The image quality of arbitrarily reconstructed planes has arrived at the image quality of the scan plane. Faster scanning allows studies in different contrast phases, which is helpful for better discrimination of benign or malignant lesions especially in the highly vascularized kidney. Different phases of contrast uptake can be differentiated (arterial, cortico-medullary, nephrographic, and excretory phase). Multidetector CT brings along the risk of increased dose due to thinner slice collimation and overranging phenomena. Indications for CT investigation of the kidney include urolithiasis, tumor diagnosis and staging, renal trauma, and vascular disease. Even in children, special indications for CT of the kidney remain in polytrauma and tumor staging. Multidetector CT of the kidney has become a very valuable tool in urology, but a careful protocol strategy is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4 a,b
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8 a,b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foley WD (2003) Renal MDCT. EJR 45:S73–S78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Statakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med Physic 32:1621–1629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M (2003) Kidneys. In: Prokop M, Galanski M (eds) Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 639–681

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kemper J, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C (2005) Multislice CT urography: aspects for technical management and clinical application. Radiologe 45:905–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuh BI, Cohan RH (1999) Different phases of renal enhancement: role in detection and characterizing renal masses during helical CT. AJR 173:747–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M, Bass JC, Francis IR (1995) Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographic-phase CT scans. Radiology 196:445–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, Tillich M, Breinl E, Fotter R, Schreyer HH (1997) Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (<3 cm) renal masses. Radiology 202:211–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mueller-Lisse UG, Mueller-Lisse UL (2004) Multi-detector CT of the kidneys. In: Multislice CT, 2nd revised edition. Medical radiology - diagnostic imaging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 211–232

  9. Sheth S, Scatarige JC, Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman FK (2001) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics 237–254

  10. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Langlotz CP, Ramchandani P (1999) Assessment of a bolus-tracking technique in helical renal CT to optimize nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology 211:87–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meindl T, Coppenrath E, Khalil R, Mueller-Lisse UL, Reiser M, Mueller-Lisse UG (2006) MDCT-urography: retrospective determination of optimal delay time after intravenous contrast administration. Eur Radiol (in press)

  12. McTavish JDJM, Zou KH, Nawfell RD, Silverman SG (2002) Multi-detector row CT urography: comparison of strategies for depicting the normal urinary collecting system. Radiology 225:783–790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow LC SF (2001) Multicenter CT urography with abdominal compression and three-dimensional reconstruction. AJR 177:849–855

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Caoilli EM, Inampudi P, Cohan RH, Ellis JH (2005) Optimization of muliti-detector row CT urography: effect of compression, saline administration, and prolongation of acquisition delay. Radiology 235:116–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nolte-Ernsting C, Staatz G, Wildberger J, Adam G (2003) MR-urography and CT-urography: principles, examination techniques, applications. RöFo Fortschr Röntgenstr 175:211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kemper J, Regier M, Begemann PG, Stork A, Adam G, Nolte-Ernsting C (2005) Multislice computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of different preparation techniques for optimized depiction of the upper urinary tract in an animal model. Invest Radiol 40:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raptopoulos V, McNamara A (2005) Improved pelvicalyceal visualization with multidetector computed tomography urography; comparison with helical computed tomography. Eur Radiol 15:1834–1840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahlmann P, Semenas E, Brekkan E, Bergman A, Magnusson A (2000) Detection and characterization of renal lesions by multiphasic helical CT. Acta Radiol 41:361–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nawfel RD, Judy PH, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG (2004) Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology 232:126–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McNicholas MMJ, Raptopoulos V, Schwartz RK, Sheiman RG, Zormpala A, Prassapoulos, PK, Ernst RD, Pearlman JD (1998) Excretory phase CT urography for opacification of the urinary collecting system. AJR 170:1261–1267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Puig S, Schaefer-Prokop C, Mang T, Prokop M (2002) Single- and multi-slice spiral computer tomography of the paediatric kidney. EJR 43:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Riccabona M (2003) Imaging of renal tumours in infancy and childhood. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl L):116–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jangland L, Sanner E, Persliden J (2004) Dose reduction in computed tomography by individualized scan protocols. Acta Radiol 45:301–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Coppenrath E, Schmid C, Brand R, Szeimies U, Hahn K (2001) Spiral CT of the abdomen: weight-adjusted dose reduction. RöFo Fortschr Roentgenstr 173:52–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olsen OE, Jeanes AC, Sebire NJ, Roebuck DJ, Michalski AJ, Risdon RA, Owens CM (2004) Changes in computed tomography features following preoperatvie chemotherapy for nephroblastoma: relation to histopathological classification. Eur Radiol 14:990–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kehagias DT, Gouliamos AD, Vlahos LJ (1999) Horseshoe kidney associated with anomalous inferior vena cava. Eur Radiol 9:935–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barbaric ZL (1994) Principles of genitourinary radiology, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cocheteux BM, Mounier-Vehier C, Gaxotte V, McFadden EP, Francke JP, Beregi JP (2001) Rare variations in renal anatomy and blood supply: CT appearance and embryological background. A pictorial essay. Eur Radiol 11:779–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Campbell MF (1970) Anomalies of the kidney. In: Campbell MF, Harrison JH (eds) Urology, vol 2, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 1416

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bosniak MA (1997) Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR 169:819–821

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Warren KS, McFarlane (2004) The Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses. BJU 95:939–942

    Google Scholar 

  32. Choyke PL (2000) Acquired cystic kidney disease. Eur Radiol 10:1716–1721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tunaci A, Yekeler E (2004) Multidetector row CT of the kidneys. Eur J Radiol 52:56–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Obuz F, Karabay N, Secil M, Igci E, Kovanlikaya A, Yorukoglu K (2000) Various radiological appearances of angiomyolipomas in the same kidney. Eur Radiol 10:897–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Konnak JW, GrossmanHB (1985) Renal cell carcinom as an incidental finding. J Urol 134:1094–1096

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lanctin HP, Futter NG (1990) Renal cell carcinoma: incidental detection. Can J Surg 33:488–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rauschmeier H (1986) Sonography - the most important study in the early detection of renal cell carcinoma. Urologe A 25:325–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsukamoto T, Kumamoto Y, Yamazaki K, Miyao N, Takahashi A, Masumori N, Satoh M (1991) Eur Urol 19:109–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rimondini A, Morra A, Bertolotto M, Locatelli M, Pozzi Mucelli R (2001) Radiol Med (Torrino) 101:459–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sokoloff MH, de Kernion JB, Figlin RA, Belldegrun A (1996) Current management of renal cell carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 46:284–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hallscheidt PJ, Fink C, Haferkamp A, Bock M, Luburic A, Zuna I, Noeldge G, Kaufmann G (2005) Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus using CT and MRI: prospective study with histopathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hallscheidt PJ, Bock M, Riedasch G, Zuna I, Schoenberg S, Autschbach F, Soder M, Noeldge G (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of staging renal cell carcinomas using multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Catalano F, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Pediconi F, Danti M, Nardis P, Passariello R (2003) High-resolution multidetecto CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. AJR 180:1271–1277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Browne RF, Zwirewich C, Torreggiani WC (2004) Imaging of urinary tract infection in the adult. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 3):E168–E183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Harris AC, Zwirewich CV, Lyburn ID, Torreggiani WC, Marchinkow LO (2001) CT findings in blunt renal trauma. Radiographics 21:S201–S214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Corl FM, West OC, Tamm EP, Fishman EK, Goldman SM (2001) Imaging of renal trauma: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 21:557–574

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP (2003) Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology 228:319–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Heneghan JP, McGuire KA, Leder RA, DeLong DM, Yoshizumi T, Nelson RC (2003) Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. Radiology 229:575–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S, Dellas S, Otto U, Buitrago C, Roth J, Wiesner W, Bongartz G, Gasser TC (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13:2513–2520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Spielmann AL, Heneghan JP, Lee LJ, Yoshizumi T, Nelson RC (2002) Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. AJR 178:1058–1062

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tack D, Sourtzis S, Dellpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Genenois PA (2003) Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR 180:305–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hamm M, Knöpfle E, Wartenberg S, Wawroschek F, Weckermann D, Harzmann R (2002) Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute Flank pain. J Urol 167:1687–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rimondini A, Pozzi Mucelli R, De Denaro M, Bregant P, Dalla Palma L (2001) Evaluation of image quality and dose in renal colic: comparison of different spiral-CT protocols. Eur Radiol 11:1140–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Olcott EW, Sommer FG, Napel S (1997) Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography and nephrotomography. Radiology 204:19–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Heneghan JP, Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1997) Soft-tissue “rim” sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 202:709–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Paul JF, Blacher J, Blancher JF, Sapoval M, Safar M, Gaux JC (2000) Spontaneous renal artery dissection revealed by helical CT angiography. Eur Radiol 10:783–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Waybill MM, Waybill PN (2001) Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity: identification of patients at risk and algorithms for prevention. JVIR 12:3–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Coppenrath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coppenrath, E.M., Mueller-Lisse, U.G. Multidetector CT of the kidney. Eur Radiol 16, 2603–2611 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0212-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0212-7

Keywords

Navigation