Abstract
The prevalence and etiology of the cystic components within gallbladder carcinomas as seen on MR images were evaluated. A retrospective review of MR images was performed for 35 proven gallbladder carcinomas in search of radiologically detectable intratumoral cystic components. The pathologic specimens were meticulously reviewed to determine the etiology. MR images of 31 adenomyomatoses were also reviewed for comparison to clarify the difference in MR features between these two entities. Three cases out of 35 proven gallbladder carcinomas were found to have intratumoral cystic components. They were all well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, and the cystic components consisted of dilated neoplastic glands filled with abundant mucin pool. Adenomyomatosis tended to have more and rounded cystic components (Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses) lined in a linear fashion and were flat-elevated in shape, smaller in size and had a regular surface, as compared to the three carcinomas. Although rare, radiologists need to be aware that well-differentiated gallbladder carcinoma with mucin production can have cystic components, which may mimic adenomyomatosis. Careful interpretation of MR images may provide useful information in the differentiation of these two entities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kaneko K et al (1999) MR diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma: importance of showing Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses. Am J Roentgenol 172:1535–1540
Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Aibe H, Shinozaki K, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, Asayama Y, Masuda K (2001) Radiologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: comparative study among MRI, helical CT, and transabdominal US. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(6):843–850
Haradome H, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Yoshikawa T, Nakamura A, Araki T, Hachiya J (2003) The pearl necklace sign: an imaging sign of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder at MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 227(1):80–88
Ishizuka D, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, Hatakeyama K (1998) Gallbladder cancer with intratumoral anechoic foci: a mimic of adenomyomatosis. Hepatogastroenterology 45(22):927–929
Raghavendra BN, Subramanyam BR, Balthazar EJ et al (1983) Sonography of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiology 146:747–752
Hwang JI, Chou SH, Tsay JH et al (1998) Radiologic and pathologic correlation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Abdom Imaging 23:73–77
Izumi N, Koyama T, Irie H et al (1985) Ultrasonography and computed tomography in adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Acta Radiol 26:689–692
Fowler RC, Reid WA (1988) Ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: ultrasonic and pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 39:402–406
Jutras JA, Longtin JM, Levesque HP (1960) Hyperplastic cholecystoses. Am J Roentgenol 83:795–827
Colqunhoun J (1961) Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder (intramural diverticulosis). Br J Radiol 34:101–112
Jutras JA, Levesque HP (1966) Adenomyoma and adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Radiol Clin North Am 4:483–500
Williams I, Slavin G, Cox AG et al (1986) Diverticular disease (adenomyomatosis) of the gallbladder: a radiological-pathological survey. Br J Radiol 59:29–34
Saul SH (1989) Gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary tree. In: Sternberg SS (ed) Diagnostic surgical pathology. Raven, New York, pp 1205–1230
Hatakenaka M, Adachi T, Matsuyama A, Mori M, Yoshikawa Y (2003) Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: importance of chemical-shift gradient-echo MR imaging. Eur Radiol 13(9):2233–2235
Shuto R, Kiyosue H, Komatsu E et al (2004) CT and MR imaging findings of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: correlation with pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 14:440–446
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshimitsu, K., Irie, H., Aibe, H. et al. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder with intratumoral cystic components due to abundant mucin production: a mimicker of adenomyomatosis. Eur Radiol 15, 229–233 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2516-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2516-9