Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR images, combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images, vs combined CT arterial portography (CTAP) and CT hepatic arteriography (CTHA), in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Twenty-four patients with 38 nodular HCCs (5–60 mm, mean 23.0 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. Image reviews were conducted on a liver segment-by-segment basis. A total of 192 segments, including 36 segments with 38 HCC, were reviewed independently by three radiologists. Each radiologist read four sets of images (set 1, unenhanced and Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images; set 2, unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MR images; set 3, combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images; set 4, combined CTAP and CTHA). To minimize any possible learning bias, the reviewing order was randomized and the reviewing procedure was performed in four sessions at 2-week intervals. The diagnostic accuracy (Az values) for HCCs of combined CTAP and CTHA, combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images, Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images, and SPIO-enhanced MR images for all observers were 0.934, 0.963, 0.878, and 0.869, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of combined CTAP and CTHA and combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images was significantly higher than Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images or SPIO-enhanced MR images (p<0.005). The mean specificity of combined CTAP and CTHA (93%) and combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images (95%) was significantly higher than Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic MR images (87%) or SPIO-enhanced MR images (88%; p<0.05). Combined Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MR images may obviate the need for more invasive combined CTAP and CTHA for the preoperative evaluation of patients with HCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lim JH, Kim CK, Lee WJ, Park CK, Koh KC, Paik SW, Joh JW (2000) Detection of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic livers: accuracy of helical CT in transplant patients. AJR 175:693–698
Heiken JP, Weyman PJ, Lee JKT, Balfe DH, Picus D, Brunt EH, Flye MW (1989) Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging. Radiology 171:47–51
Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Bemardino ME (1989) Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 172:27–34
Kanematsu M, Hoshi H, Imaeda T, Murakami T, Inaba Y, Nakamura H (1997) Detection and characterization of hepatic tumors: values of combined helical CT hepatic angiography and CT during arterial portography. AJR 168:1193–1198
Murakami T, Oi H, Hori M, Kim T, Takahashi S, Tomoda K, Narumi Y, Nakamura H (1997) Helical CT during arterial portography and hepatic arteriography for detecting hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR 169:131–135
Yamashita Y, Fan ZM, Yamamoto H, Matsukawa T, Yashimatsu S, Miyajaki T, Sumi M, Harada H, Takahashi M (1994) Spin-echo and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histopathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:83–90
Hamm B, Thoeni RF, Gould RG, Bernardino ME, Luning M, Saini S, Mahfouz AE, Taupitz M, Wolf KJ (1994) Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 190:417–423
Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Yi T, Ogata I, Nishiharu T, Urata J, Takahashi M (1996) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR and helical CT of the whole liver. Radiology 200:79–84
Muller RD, Vogel K, Neumann K, Hirche H, Barkhausen J, Stoblen E, Henrich H, Langer R (1999) SPIO-MR imaging vs double-phase spiral CT in detecting malignant lesions of the liver. Acta Radiol 40:628–635
Poeckler-Schoeniger C, Koepke J, Gueckel F, Strum J, Goergi M (1999) MRI with superparamagnetic iron oxide: efficacy in the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 17:383–392
Yamamoto H, Yamachita Y, Yoshimatsu S, Baba Y, Hatanaka Y, Murakami R, Nishiharu T, Takahashi M, Higashida Y, Moribe N (1995) Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver: detection with unenhanced and iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 195:106–112
Itai Y (1998) Combined CT during arterial portography and CT arteriography (Letter). Abdom Imaging 23:337
Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A, Namimoto T, Mitsuzaki K, Abe Y, Katahira K, Takahahi M (1999) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhotic livers: comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 172:1547–1554
Imai Y, Murakami T, Yoshida S, Nishikawa M, Ohsawa M, Tokunaga K, Murata M, Shibata K, Zushi S, Kurokawa M, Yonezawa T, Kawata S, Takamura M, Nagano H, Sakon M, Monden M, Wakasa K, Nakamura H (2000) Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading. Hepatology 32:205–212
Rockette HE, Gur D, Metz CE (1992) The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operator characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 27:169–172
Hundt W, Petsch R, Helmgerger T, Reiser M (2000) Signal changes in liver and spleen after Endorem administration in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol 10:409–416
Lim JH, Choi DI, Cho SK, Kim SH, Lee WJ, Lim HK, Park CK, Paik SW, Kim YI (2001) Conspicuity of hepatocellular nodular lesions in cirrhotic livers at ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging: importance of Kupffer cell number. Radiology 220:669–676
Ward J, Guthrie J, Scott DJ, Atchley J, Wilson D, Davies MH, Wyatt JI, Robinson PJ (2000) Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: double-contrast MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 216:154–162
Choi DI, Kim SH, Lim JH, Lee WJ, Jang HJ, Lee SJ, Lim HK (2001) Preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging vs combined helical CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. AJR 176:475–482
Paulet D, Textor J, Bachmann R, Conrad R, Flacke S, Layer G, Kreft B, Schild H (2002) Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 222:73–80
Krinsky GA, Lee VS, Theise ND, Weinreb JC, Rofsky NM, Diflo T, Teperman LW (2001) Hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules in patients with cirrhosis: prospective diagnosis with MR imaging and explantation correlation. Radiology 219:445–454
Kanamatsu M, Hoshi H, Murakami T, Inaba Y, Kim T, Yamada T, Kato M, Yokoyama R, Nakamura H (1997) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: MR imaging vs angiographically assisted helical CT. AJR 169:1507–1515
Hori M, Murakami T, Oi H, Kim T, Takahashi S, Matsushita M, Tomoda K, Narumi Y, Kadowaki K, Nakamura H (1998) Sensitivity in detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma by helical CT with intra-arterial injection of contrast medium, and by helical CT and MR imaging with intravenous injection of contrast medium. Acta Radiol 39:144–151
Bluemke DA, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995) Nontumorous low-attenuation defects in the liver on helical CT during arterial portography: frequency, location, and appearance. AJR 164:1141–1145
Soyer P, Lacheheb D, Levesque M (1993) False-positive CT portography: correlation with pathologic findings. AJR 160:285–289
Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, Yoshikawa J, Takashima J, Nakanuma Y, Unoura M, Kobayashi K, Izumi R, Ida M (1991) Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 178:493–497
Saitoh S, Ikeda K, Koida I, Tsubota A, Arase Y, Chayama K, Kumada H (1994) Small hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of portal blood flow with CT during arterial portography performed with balloon occlusion of the hepatic artery. Radiology 193:67–70
Oliver JH III, Baron RL, Dodd GD III, Peterson MR, Carr BI (1995) Does advanced cirrhosis with portosystemic shunting affect the value of CT arterial portography in the evaluation of the liver? AJR 164:333–337
Jang HJ, Lim JH, Lee SJ, Park CK, Park HS, Do YS (2000) Hepatocellular carcinoma: Are combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography in addition to triple-phase helical CT all necessary for preoperative evaluation? Radiology 215:373–380
Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Hoshi H, Murakami T, Kim T, Hori M, Matsuo M, Nakamura H (2000) Preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors: comparison of combined methods of MR imaging with combined methods of CT. AJR 174:957–954
Krinsky GA, Theise ND, Rofsky NM, Mizrach H, Tepperman LW, Weinreb JC (1998) Dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver: arterial phase enhancement at CT and MR imaging: a case report. Radiology 209:461–464
Yu JS, Kim KW, Jeong MG, Lee JT, Yoo HS (2000) Nontumorous hepatic arterial-portal venous shunts: MR imaging findings. Radiology 217:750–756
Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Jimi M, Kuroiwa T, Krie H, Aibe H, Shinozaki K, Asayama Y, Shimada M, Masuda K (2001) Correlation of three-dimensional gradient-echo dynamic MR imaging with CT during hepatic arteriography in patients with hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:258–262
Ichikawa T, Kitamura T, Nakajima H, Sou H, Tsukamoto T, Ikenaga S, Araki T (2002) Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Can double arterial-phase imaging with multidetector CT improve tumor depiction in the cirrhotic liver? AJR 179:751–758
Acknowledgement
The authors thank B. Hami, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, for her assistance in manuscript preparation and editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kwak, HS., Lee, JM. & Kim, CS. Preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of combined contrast-enhanced MR imaging and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Eur Radiol 14, 447–457 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2070-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2070-x