Skip to main content
Log in

Plant regeneration from protoplasts of mango (Mangifera indica L.) through somatic embryogenesis

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 This report describes a protocol for the regeneration of plants from protoplasts isolated from proembryogenic masses (PEMs) in a suspension culture derived from the nucellar callus of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv 'Amrapali'). The maximum yield (24.6±1.1×106), with 81.04±4.1% viable protoplasts per gram PEMs, was obtained with an enzyme mixture containing 1.2% cellulase, 1.0% hemicellulase and 0.6% pectinase. An optimum density of 5×104 cultured protoplasts per milliliter culture medium was required for the highest frequency (88.89±5.40%) of division. Dividing protoplasts developed into microcalli that proliferated on medium supplemented with growth regulators (auxins or kinetin alone, or auxins with kinetin) and produced somatic embryos after transfer to a growth regulator-free medium. The protocallus on 2,4-D-containing medium produced the maximum number (102.50±6.93) of somatic embryos. Maturation of somatic embryos depended upon the presence, and the nature and combination of growth regulators in the medium during proliferation of the callus. The mature somatic embryos germinated and developed into plants that were transferred to soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 1 April 1999 / Revision received: 27 July 1999 / Accepted: 23 August 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ara, H., Jaiswal, U. & Jaiswal, V. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of mango (Mangifera indica L.) through somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 19, 622–627 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050783

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050783

Navigation