Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics and antitumor effects of mitoxantrone after intratumoral or intraarterial hepatic administration in rabbits

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 The intratumoral (i.t.) delivery of anticancer drugs aims at controlling tumor growth and thereby provides palliative treatment for liver neoplasms. Mitoxantrone is a good candidate for local or regional administration because (1) its metabolism is mainly hepatic, (2) it has a steep dose-response curve for multiple solid tumors, and (3) its fixation in tissues is sustained without vesicant effects after extravasation. We compared the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects of mitoxantrone on hepatic VX2 tumors in rabbits treated with i.t. intraarterial hepatic (i.a.h.) or i.v. mitoxantrone, i.t. ethanol; or i.t. 0.9% NaCl and in control animals. Tumor growth rates (TGRs) were evaluated at 9 days after treatment. Myelosuppression was the limiting toxicity of i.v. mitoxantrone at 1.5 mg/kg (maximal tolerated dose, MTD), but neither i.t. nor i.a.h. administration led to hematologic toxicity at the same dose. The mitoxantrone retained in tumors after i.t. administration was seen as blue-stained areas of complete necrosis according to histologic analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed a significantly decreased systemic exposure to the drug after both regional treatments, although the i.a.h. route appeared to have an edge over the i.t. route. TGRs were significantly reduced after i.t. mitoxantrone (81±62%), i.a.h. mitoxantrone (337±110%), and i.t. ethanol treatments (287±117%) as compared with control values (886±223%; p<0.01). Treatment with i.v. mitoxantrone (816±132%) had no antitumor effect, nor did NaCl injections (868±116%). Mitoxantrone given i.t. induced the highest antitumor effects, resulting in a 3.5-fold reduction in TGRs as compared with i.a.h. mitoxantrone and i.t. ethanol treatments (p<0.02). Treatment with i.t. mitoxantrone provided efficient antitumor therapy without producing major side effects. This method should be considered as palliative treatment for nonresectable liver tumors and other localized malignancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 13 December 1994/Accepted: 6 June 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramirez, L., Zhao, Z., Rougier, P. et al. Pharmacokinetics and antitumor effects of mitoxantrone after intratumoral or intraarterial hepatic administration in rabbits. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37, 371–376 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002800050399

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002800050399

Navigation