Abstract
Background
There is no standard first-line therapy for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and the prognosis remains poor. Our institution conducted a phase I study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine given in a novel, weekly schedule. The regimen was tolerated; pharmacodynamic studies revealed no drug interactions, and there was one confirmed response in a gastric cancer patient. We performed a phase II trial in advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma to determine response rate and response duration.
Methods
This was a multi-center single treatment arm study involving six sites. Only prior adjuvant therapy was allowed. Patients had ECOG performance status of 0–2, adequate organ function, and were able to tolerate oral medications. All patients received oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 IV weekly times 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period. Capecitabine 450 mg bid orally was received on days 1 through 5 every week for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. Patients were assessed for response after the first two cycles; response duration, overall survival, and adverse events were also recorded. We estimated an improvement in historical response rate by 30% would have clinical meaning.
Results
A total of 39 patients were accrued and all were assessed for toxicity; 30 patients were evaluable for response. The median age was 57.8 years (31–79 years) and 74% were male. Two patients had a complete response, with nine patients achieving a partial response. The total response rate was 28%, with nine patients not evaluable for response. The median response duration was noted at 5.97 months and median overall survival was 8.98 months. There were no grade 5 treatment related events, with all deaths secondary to disease progression. Only five grade 4 events occurred (neutropenia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia (2), thrombosis/embolism) without grade 4 diarrhea or sensory neuropathy.
Conclusions
Oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine given in a novel, weekly schedule does induce responses in advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. However, the total response rate is modest and not an improvement over other regimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Batran SE, Atmaca A, Hegewisch-Becker S et al (2004) Phase II trial of biweekly infusional flurouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 22:658–663
Chansky K, Benedetti J, Macdonald JS (2005) Differences in toxicity between men and women treated with 5-fluorouracil therapy for colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 103:1165–1171
Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, Middleton G, Daniel F, Oates J, Norman AR, Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group of the National Cancer Research Institute of the United Kingdom (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric Cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46
Dank M, Zaluski J, Barone C, Valvere V, Peschel C, Wenczl E, Goker M, Risse M, Awad L, Bugat R (2005) Randomized phase 3 trial of irinotecan + 5FU/folinic acid vs CDDP + 5FU in first-line advanced gastric cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23:308s abstr 4003
Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053
DeVita F, Orditura M, Matano E et al (2005) Phase II trial of biweekly oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-flurouracil and folinic acid (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy of advanced gastric carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer 92:1644–1649
Dragovich T, McCoy S, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Wang J, Benedetti JK, Baker AF, Hackett CB, Urba SG, Zaner KS, Blanke CD, Abbruzzese JL (2006) Phase II trial of erlotinib in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinomas: SWOG 0127. J Clin Oncol 24:4922–4927
Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M (2002) AJCC Cancer staging manual, Chap. 10, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 112
Hahnfeldt P, Folkman J, Hlatky L (2003) Minimizing long-term tumor burden: logic for metronomic chemotherapeutic dosing and its angiogenesis basis. J Theor Biol 220:545–554
Jemel A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66
Keller G, Hofler H, Becker KF (2005) Molecular medicine of gastric adenocarcinomas. Expert Rev Mol Med 7:1–13 Review
Kim Ni, Park YS, Hedo DS, Suh C, Kim SY, Park KC, Kang YK, Shin DB, Kim HT, Kim HJ (1993) Phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 71:3813–3818
Krishnamurthi SS, Brell JM, Hoppel CL, Egorin MJ, Weaver KC, Li X, Ingalls ST, Zuhowski EG, Schluchter MD, Dowlati A, Cooney MM, Gibbons J, Overmoyer BA, Ivy SP, and Remick SC (2008) Phase I clinical trial and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Apr 15 [Epub ahead of print]
Ocean AJ, Schnoll-Sussman F, Keresztes R, Chen X, Holloway S, Matthews N, Christos P, Mazumdar M, Wright J, Wadler S (2006) Phase II study of PS-341 (bortrezominb) with or withour irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinomas. ASCO annual meeting proceedings. J Clin Oncol 24:14040
Pinto C, Di Fabio F, Siena S, Cascinu S, Rojas Llimpe FL, Ceccarelli C, Mutri V, Giannetta L, Giaquinta S, Funaioli C, Berardi R, Longobardi C, Piana E, Martoni AA (2006) Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FOLCETUX study). Ann Oncol 18:510–517
Ross P, Nicolson M, Cunningham D, Valle J, Seymour M, Harper P, Price T, Anderson H, Iveson T, Hickish T, Lofts F, Norman A (2002) Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:1996–2004
Shah MA, Ramanathan RK, Ilson DH, Levnor A, D’Adamo D, O’Reilly E, Tse A, Trocola R, Schwartz L, Capanu M, Schwartz GK, Kelsen DP (2006) Multicenter phase II study of irinotecan, cisplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:5201–5206
Shirao K, Shimada Y, Kondo H, Saito D, Yamao T, Ono H, Yokoyama T, Fukuda H, Oka M, Watanabe Y, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Fujii T, Oda Y, Muro K, Yoshida S (1997) Phase I-II study of irinotecan hydrochloride combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:921–927
Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85:1457–1459
Sloan JA, Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Vargas-Chanes D, Nair S, Cha SS, Novotny PJ, Poon MA, O’Connell MJ, Loprinzi CL (2002) Women experience greater toxicity with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:1491–1498
Suvannasankha A, Fausel C, Juliar BE, Yiannoutsos CT, Fisher WB, Ansari RH, Wood LL, Smith GG, Cripe LD, Abonour R (2007) Final reports of toxicity and efficacy of phase II study or oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and prednisone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a Hoosier Oncology Group Trial, HEM01-21. Oncologist 12:99–106
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancers, National cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, Rodrigues A, Fodor M, Chao Y, Voznyi E, Risse ML, Ajani JA, V325 Study Group (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997
Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, Ducreux MP, Lacave AJ, Van Cutsem E, Planker M, Santos JG, Piedbois P, Paillot B, Bodenstein H, Schmoll HJ, Bleiberg H, Nordlinger B, Couvreur ML, Baron B, Wils JA (2000) Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 81:2648–2657
Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig W (2006) Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systemic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol 24:2903–2909
Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, Harper P, Norman A, Joffe JK, Hughes M, Mansi J, Findlay M, Hill A, Oates J, Nicolson M, Hickish T, O’Brien M, Iveson T, Watson M, Underhill C, Wardley A, Meehan M (1997) Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:261–267
Wils JA, Klein HO, Wagener DJ, Bleiberg H, Reis H, Korsten F, Conroy T, Fickers M, Leyvraz S, Buyse M (1991) Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin—a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 9:827–831
Zhao HC, Qin R, Chen XX, Sheng X, Wu JF, Wang DB, Chen GH (2006) Microvessel density is a prognostic marker of human gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 21:7598–7603
Acknowledgments
Supported by NIH grant U01 CA62502.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brell, J.M., Krishnamurthi, S.S., Javle, M. et al. A multi-center phase II study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63, 851–857 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-008-0807-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-008-0807-6