Skip to main content
Log in

Decitabine improves progression-free survival in older high-risk MDS patients with multiple autosomal monosomies: results of a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III study 06011 of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group and German MDS Study Group

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a study of elderly AML patients treated with the hypomethylating agent decitabine (DAC), we noted a surprisingly favorable outcome in the (usually very unfavorable) subgroup with two or more autosomal monosomies (MK2+) within a complex karyotype (Lübbert et al., Haematologica 97:393-401, 2012). We now analyzed 206 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients (88 % of 233 patients randomized in the EORTC/GMDSSG phase III trial 06011, 61 of them with RAEBt, i.e. AML by WHO) with cytogenetics informative for MK status.. Endpoints are the following: complete/partial (CR/PR) and overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Cytogenetic subgroups are the following: 63 cytogenetically normal (CN) patients, 143 with cytogenetic abnormalities, 73 of them MK-negative (MK−), and 70 MK-positive (MK+). These MK+ patients could be divided into 17 with a single autosomal monosomy (MK1) and 53 with at least two monosomies (MK2+). ORR with DAC in CN patients: 36.1 %, in MK− patients: 16.7 %, in MK+ patients: 43.6 % (MK1: 44.4 %, MK2+ 43.3 %). PFS was prolonged by DAC compared to best supportive care (BSC) in the CN (hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 99 % confidence interval (CI), 0.26; 1.15, p = 0.03) and MK2+ (HR 0.50; 99 % CI, 0.23; 1.06, p = 0.016) but not in the MK−, MK+, and MK1 subgroups. OS was not improved by DAC in any subgroup. In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time in a randomized phase III trial that high-risk MDS patients with complex karyotypes harboring two or more autosomal monosomies attain encouraging responses and have improved PFS with DAC treatment compared to BSC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burnett AK, Milligan D, Prentice AG, Goldstone AH, McMullin MF, Hills RK, Wheatley K (2007) A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive treatment. Cancer 109(6):1114–1124. doi:10.1002/cncr.22496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, Bennett JM, Bowen D, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Kantarjian H, Kuendgen A, Levis A, Malcovati L, Cazzola M, Cermak J, Fonatsch C, Le Beau MM, Slovak ML, Krieger O, Lubbert M, Maciejewski J, Magalhaes SMM, Miyazaki Y, Pfeilstöcker M, Sekeres M, Sperr WR, Stauder R, Tauro S, Valent P, Vallespi T, van de Loosdrecht AA, Germing U, Haase D (2012) Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 120(12):2454–2465. doi:10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Haase D, Germing U, Schanz J, Pfeilstöcker M, Nösslinger T, Hildebrandt B, Kündgen A, Lübbert M, Kunzmann R, Giagounidis AAN, Aul C, Trümper L, Krieger O, Stauder R, Müller TH, Wimazal F, Valent P, Fonatsch C, Steidl C (2007) New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients. Blood 110(13):4385–4395. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-03-082404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kayser S, Zucknick M, Döhner K, Krauter J, Köhne CH, Horst HA, Held G, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Wilhelm S, Rummel M, Germing U, Götze K, Nachbaur D, Schlegelberger B, Göhring G, Späth D, Morlok C, Teleanu V, Ganser A, Döhner H, Schlenk RF (2011) Monosomal karyotype in adult acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic impact and outcome after different treatment strategies. Blood 119(2):551–558. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-07-367508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Burnett AK, Dombret H, Fenaux P, Grimwade D, Larson RA, Lo-Coco F, Naoe T, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele GJ, Sanz MA, Sierra J, Tallman MS, Löwenberg B, Bloomfield CD (2009) Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European leukemiaNet. Blood 115(3):453–474. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burnett AK, Russell NH, Kell J, Dennis M, Milligan D, Paolini S, Yin J, Culligan D, Johnston P, Murphy J, McMullin MF, Hunter A, Das-Gupta E, Clark R, Carr R, Hills RK (2010) European development of clofarabine as treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28(14):2389–2395. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.26.4242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cashen AF, Schiller GJ, O’Donnell MR, DiPersio JF (2009) Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 28(4):556–561. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.9178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lübbert M, Rüter BH, Claus R, Schmoor C, Schmid M, Germing U, Kuendgen A, Rethwisch V, Ganser A, Platzbecker U, Galm O, Brugger W, Heil G, Hackanson B, Deschler B, Döhner K, Hagemeijer A, Wijermans PW, Döhner H (2012) A multicenter phase II trial of decitabine as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia judged unfit for induction chemotherapy. Haematologica 97(3):393–401. doi:10.3324/haematol.2011.048231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, Wierzbowska A, Selleslag D, Jang JH, Kumar R, Cavenagh J, Schuh AC, Candoni A, Récher C, Sandhu I, Bernal Del Castillo T, Al-Ali HK, Martinelli G, Falantes J, Noppeney R, Stone RM, Minden MD, McIntyre H, Songer S, Lucy LM, Beach CL, Döhner H (2015) International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood 126(3):291–299. doi:10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A, Schoch R, Gattermann N, Sanz G, List A, Gore SD, Seymour JF, Bennett JM, Byrd J, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach CL, Silverman LR (2009) Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol 10(3):223–232. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70003-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lübbert M, Suciu S, Baila L, Rüter BH, Platzbecker U, Giagounidis A, Selleslag D, Labar B, Germing U, Salih HR, Beeldens F, Muus P, Pflüger KH, Coens C, Hagemeijer A, Schaefer HE, Ganser A, Aul C, de Witte T, Wijermans PW (2011) Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with Intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer leukemia group and the German MDS study group. J Clin Oncol 29(15):1987–1996. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.9245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Helm LH, Alhan C, Wijermans PW, van Marwijk KM, Schaafsma R, Biemond BJ, Beeker A, Hoogendoorn M, van Rees BP, de Weerdt O, Wegman J, Libourel WJ, Luykx-de Bakker SA, Minnema MC, Brouwer RE, Croon-de Boer F, Eefting M, Jie K-SG, van de Loosdrecht AA, Koedam J, Veeger NJGM, Vellenga E, Huls G (2011) Platelet doubling after the first azacitidine cycle is a promising predictor for response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in the Dutch azacitidine compassionate named patient programme. Br J Haematol 155(5):599–606. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08893.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wijermans PW, Lübbert M, Verhoef G, Klimek V, Bosly A (2005) An epigenetic approach to the treatment of advanced MDS; the experience with the DNA demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in 177 patients. Ann Hematol 84(S1):9–17. doi:10.1007/s00277-005-0012-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Helm LH, Veeger NJGM, Kooy MM, Beeker A, de Weerdt O, de Groot M, Alhan C, Hoogendoorn M, Laterveer L, van de Loosdrecht AA, Koedam J, Vellenga E, Huls G (2013) Azacitidine results in comparable outcome in newly diagnosed AML patients with more or less than 30% bone marrow blasts. Leuk Res 37(8):877–882. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2013.03.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G, Ravandi F, Faderl S, O’Brien S, Fullmer A, Cortes JE, Wierda W, Kantarjian H (2013) Prognostic factors associated with disease progression and overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with decitabine. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 13(2):131–138. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2012.11.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Estey EH (2013) Epigenetics in clinical practice: the examples of azacitidine and decitabine in myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 27(9):1803–1812. doi:10.1038/leu.2013.173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lübbert M, Wijermans P, Kunzmann R, Verhoef G, Bosly A, Ravoet C, Andre M, Ferrant A (2001) Cytogenetic responses in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome following low-dose treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Br J Haematol 114(2):349–357. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2001.02933.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rüter B, Wijermans P, Claus R, Kunzmann R, Lübbert M (2007) Preferential cytogenetic response to continuous intravenous low-dose decitabine (DAC) administration in myelodysplastic syndrome with monosomy 7. Blood 110(3):1080–1082. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-03-080630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raj K, John A, Ho A, Chronis C, Khan S, Samuel J, Pomplun S, Thomas NSB, Mufti GJ (2007) CDKN2B methylation status and isolated chromosome 7 abnormalities predict responses to treatment with 5-azacytidine. Leukemia 21(9):1937–1944. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schanz J, Tüchler H, Solé F, Mallo M, Luño E, Cervera J, Grau J, Hildebrandt B, Slovak ML, Ohyashiki K, Steidl C, Fonatsch C, Pfeilstöcker M, Nösslinger T, Valent P, Giagounidis A, Aul C, Lübbert M, Stauder R, Krieger O, Le Beau MM, Bennett JM, Greenberg P, Germing U, Haase D (2013) Monosomal karyotype in MDS: explaining the poor prognosis? Leukemia 27(10):1988–1995. doi:10.1038/leu.2013.187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valcarcel D, Adema V, Sole F, Ortega M, Nomdedeu B, Sanz G, Luno E, Canizo C, de la Serna J, Ardanaz M, Marco V, Collado R, Grau J, Montoro J, Mallo M, Vallespi T (2013) Complex, not monosomal, karyotype is the cytogenetic marker of poorest prognosis in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 31(7):916–922. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.41.6073

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Becker H, Suciu S, Rüter BH, Platzbecker U, Giagounidis A, Selleslag D, Labar B, Germing U, Salih HR, Muus P, Pflüger KH, Hagemeijer A, Schaefer HE, Fiaccadori V, Baron F, Ganser A, Aul C, de Witte T, Wijermans PW, Lübbert M (2015) Decitabine versus best supportive care in older patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBt)—results of a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III study 06011 of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group and German MDS Study Group (GMDSSG). Ann Hematol 94(12):2003–2013. doi:10.1007/s00277-015-2489-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Breems DA, Van Putten WLJ, De Greef GE, Van Zelderen-Bhola SL, Gerssen-Schoorl KBJ, Mellink CHM, Nieuwint A, Jotterand M, Hagemeijer A, Beverloo HB, Löwenberg B (2008) Monosomal karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia: a better indicator of poor prognosis than a complex karyotype. J Clin Oncol 26(29):4791–4797. doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.0259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, Pinto A, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Gore SD, Schiffer CA, Kantarjian H (2006) Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood 108(2):419–425. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149

  25. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, Pinto A, Schiffer CA, Nimer SD, Löwenberg B, Beran M, de Witte TM, Stone RM, Mittelman M, Sanz GF, Wijermans PW, Gore S, Greenberg PL, World Health Organization (WHO) international working group (2000) Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 96(12):3671–3674

  26. Wijermans PW, Krulder JWM, Huijgens PC, Neve P (1997) Continuous infusion of low-dose 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine in elderly patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 11(1):1–5. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2400526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wijermans P, Lübbert M, Verhoef G, Bosly A, Ravoet C, Andre M, Ferrant A (2000) Low-dose 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, a DNA hypomethylating agent, for the treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 18(5):956–962

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kantarjian H, Issa J-PJ, Rosenfeld CS, Bennett JM, Albitar M, DiPersio J, Klimek V, Slack J, de Castro C, Ravandi F, Helmer R, Shen L, Nimer SD, Leavitt R, Raza A, Saba H (2006) Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer 106(8):1794–1803. doi:10.1002/cncr.21792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oosterveld M, Suciu S, Muus P, Germing U, Delforge M, Belhabri A, Aul C, Selleslag D, Ferrant A, Marie JP, Amadori S, Jehn U, Mandelli F, Hess U, Hellström-Lindberg E, Cakmak-Wollgast S, Vignetti M, Labar B, Willemze R, de Witte T (2015) Specific scoring systems to predict survival of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after intensive antileukemic treatment based on results of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-10 and intergroup CRIANT studies. Ann Hematol 94(1):23–34. doi:10.1007/s00277-014-2177-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hwang KL, Song MK, Shin HJ, Na HJ, Shin DH, Kim JK, Moon JH, Ahn JS, Song IC, Hong J, Lee GW, Chung JS (2014) Monosomal and complex karyotypes as prognostic parameters in patients with international prognostic scoring system higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome treated with azacitidine. Blood Res 49(4):234–240. doi:10.5045/br.2014.49.4.234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pleyer L, Burgstaller S, Girschikofsky M, Linkesch W, Stauder R, Pfeilstocker M, Schreder M, Tinchon C, Sliwa T, Lang A, Sperr WR, Krippl P, Geissler D, Voskova D, Schlick K, Thaler J, Machherndl-Spandl S, Theiler G, Eckmüllner O, Greil R (2014) Azacitidine in 302 patients with WHO-defined acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Austrian azacitidine registry of the AGMT-study group. Ann Hematol 93(11):1825–1838. doi:10.1007/s00277-014-2126-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Philipp Sander and Margit Sauer for the editorial assistance and Claudia Schmoor for the helpful discussions. This publication was supported by the EORTC Charitable Trust; the 06011 trial was supported by an educational grant from MGI Pharma and Janssen Research and Development. Survival data of the PCH phase II studies were kindly provided by Janssen Research and Development. M.L. is supported by DFG (SFB 992/Medep).

Authors’ contributions

M.L., S. S., A. H., B. R., P. M., L. B., G. H., T. de W., and P. W. W. contributed to the conception and design. M. L., B. R., U. P., A. G., D. S., U. G., B. L, K.-H. P., H.-E. Sch., H. R. S., P. M., G. H., L. van der H., E. V., F. B., J.-P. M., A. G., C. A., T. de W., and P. W. W. contributed to the provision of study materials or patients. M.L., S. S., A. H., L. van der H., and G. H. contributed to the collection and assembly of data. M.L., S. S., and L. B. contributed to the data analyses and interpretation. M.L., S.S., and L. B. contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lübbert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial conflict of interests except for the following authors (U, no compensation was received; C, compensation was received): Consultant or Advisory Role: Uwe Platzbecker, Celgene (C), Amgen (C), and Novartis (C); Aristoteles Giagounidis, Celgene (C); Dominik Selleslag, Celgene (C), Novartis (C), and Amgen (C); Arnold Ganser, Celgene (C) and Novartis (C); and Michael Lübbert, Johnson & Johnson (C); and Petra Muus, Alexion (U). Honoraria: Uwe Platzbecker, Celgene, Novartis, and Amgen; Aristoteles Giagounidis, Celgene; Dominik Selleslag, Celgene, Novartis, and Amgen; Ulrich Germing, Johnson & Johnson; and Arnold Ganser, Genzyme. Research Funding: Michael Lübbert, Johnson & Johnson; Uwe Platzbecker, Celgene and Novartis; and Ulrich Germing, MDS Registry Düsseldorf.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 136 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lübbert, M., Suciu, S., Hagemeijer, A. et al. Decitabine improves progression-free survival in older high-risk MDS patients with multiple autosomal monosomies: results of a subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III study 06011 of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group and German MDS Study Group. Ann Hematol 95, 191–199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2547-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2547-0

Keywords

Navigation