Skip to main content
Log in

Importance of maintaining the relative dose intensity of CHOP-like regimens combined with rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CHOP-like regimen combined with rituximab is a standard chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The relative dose intensity (RDI) was proposed as an index of the dose and administration interval of agents. Previous studies reported that the maintenance of the RDI during CHOP therapy improved the treatment results. However, few studies regarding RDI have reviewed patients receiving combination therapy with CHOP and rituximab. We investigated the influence of RDI maintenance, involving combination therapy with rituximab, on therapeutic effects in patients with DLBCL. We retrospectively examined 152 DLBCL patients who were treated with CHOP-like regimen combined with rituximab in whom the RDI could be followed up. Multivariate analysis revealed that international prognosis index (IPI) high intermediate-high (HI-H) (p = 0.005) and RDI of less than 70% (p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for low progression free survival. Concerning overall survival, IPI HI-H (p = 0.027) and an RDI of less than 70% (p = 0.002) were involved in an unfavorable prognosis. In addition, age over 60 years (p = 0.003), R-THPCOP (p = 0.034), or the presence of febrile neutropenia (p = 0.004) made RDI maintenance difficult, and prophylactic G-CSF therapy (p = 0.026) was useful for maintaining the RDI. Maintaining the RDI is important even in the era of rituximab-combined chemotherapy for DLBCL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morton LM, Wang SS, Devesa SS et al (2006) Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States. Blood 107(1):265–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoki R, Karube K, Sugita Y et al (2008) Distribution of malignant lymphoma in Japan: analysis of 2260 cases, 2001-2006. Pathol Int 58(3):174–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vose JM, Link BK, Grossbard ML et al (2001) Phase II study of rituximab in combination with chop chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 19(2):389–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J et al (2002) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346(4):235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehn LH, Donaldson J, Chhanabhai M et al (2005) Introduction of combined CHOP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5027–5033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sehn LH, Berry B, Chhanabhai M et al (2007) The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Blood 109(5):1857–1861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park YH, Lee JJ, Ryu MH et al (2006) Improved therapeutic outcomes of DLBCL after introduction of rituximab in Korean patients. Ann Hematol 85(4):257–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blayney DW, LeBlanc ML, Grogan T et al (2003) Dose-intense chemotherapy every 2 weeks with dose-intense cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone may improve survival in intermediate- and high-grade lymphoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9349). J Clin Oncol 21(13):2457–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfreundschuh M, Truemper L, Kloess M et al (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104(3):634–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tobinai K, Hotta T (2004) Clinical trials for malignant lymphoma in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(7):369–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S et al (1993) Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 328(14):1002–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S et al (1994) A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study. Ann Oncol 5(Suppl 2):91–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sertoli MR, Santini G, Chisesi T et al (1994) MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol 12(7):1366–1374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon LI, Andersen J, Colgan J et al (1995) Advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Analysis of prognostic factors by the international index and by lactic dehydrogenase in an intergroup study. Cancer 75(3):865–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Epelbaum R, Haim N, Ben-Shahar M et al (1988) Dose-intensity analysis for CHOP chemotherapy in diffuse aggressive large cell lymphoma. Isr J Med Sci 24(9–10):533–538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dixon DO, Neilan B, Jones SE et al (1986) Effect of age on therapeutic outcome in advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma: the Southwest Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol 4(3):295–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwak LW, Halpern J, Olshen RA, Horning SJ (1990) Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: results of a tree-structured survival analysis. J Clin Oncol 8(6):963–977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Epelbaum R, Faraggi D, Ben-Arie Y et al (1990) Survival of diffuse large cell lymphoma. A multivariate analysis including dose intensity variables. Cancer 66(6):1124–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, Haioun C et al (1993) Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: application to LNH-87 protocol. The GELA. (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte). Ann Oncol 4(8):651–656

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosly A, Bron D, Van Hoof A et al (2008) Achievement of optimal average relative dose intensity and correlation with survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOP. Ann Hematol 87(4):277–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pettengell R, Schwenkglenks M, Bosly A (2008) Association of reduced relative dose intensity and survival in lymphoma patients receiving CHOP-21 chemotherapy. Ann Hematol 87(5):429–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Friedberg J et al (2004) Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a nationwide study. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4302–4311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsurumi H, Hara T, Goto N et al (2007) A phase II study of a THP-COP regimen for the treatment of elderly patients aged 70 years or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Hematol Oncol 25(3):107–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hara T, Tsurumi H, Goto N et al (2009) Phase II study of Rituximab combined with THP-COP as first-line therapy for patients younger than 70 years with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Doi: 136:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP et al (2002) 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 34(6):730–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project (1993) A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 329(14):987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Terada Y, Nakamae H, Aimoto R et al (2009) Impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) in CHOP combined with rituximab (R-CHOP) on survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 28:116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24(19):3187–3205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Yamaguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirakawa, T., Yamaguchi, H., Yokose, N. et al. Importance of maintaining the relative dose intensity of CHOP-like regimens combined with rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol 89, 897–904 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-0956-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-0956-7

Keywords

Navigation