Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An anatomical study of persistent trigeminal artery detected by computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography: proposal for a modified classification and a novel basilar artery grading system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the anatomical characteristics of persistent trigeminal artery (PTA) detected by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), propose a modified classification and a novel grading system for basilar artery (BA).

Methods

Patients who underwent head CTA or MRA in our hospital between August 2014 and August 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. The prevalence, sex, and course of PTA were evaluated. PTA types were modified based on Weon’s classification. Type I to IV were similar to those in Weon’s classification except the presence of intermed fetal-type posterior cerebral artery (IF-PCA). Type V was the same as that in Weon’s classification. Type VI included subtypes of VIa (concomitant IF-PCA based on type I to IV) and VIb (other variants). BA was assessed based on a scale of 0 to 5 compared with PTA’s caliber (0, BA aplasia; 1 and 2, BA non-dominant; 3, equilibrium; 4 and 5, BA dominant).

Results

A total of 57 patients (0.06%) with PTA, including 36 females and 21 males, were detected in 94,487 patients. Six patients (10.5%) were medial type and 51 patients (89.5%) were lateral type. Thirty-seven patients (64.9%) were type I, 1 (1.8%) as type II, 13 (22.8%) as type III, 3 (5.3%) as type IV, 1 (1.8%) as type V, and 2 (3.5%) as type VI. For BA grading, 4 (7.0%), 21 (36.8%), 17 (29.8%), 6 (10.5%), 6 (10.5%), and 3 (5.3%) of the patients were grade 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Fifteen patients (26.3%) had intracranial aneurysms. One cases (1.8%) had a fenestration of the PTA.

Conclusion

The prevalence of PTA in our study was lower than that in most previous reports. The modified PTA classification and BA grading system can be used to better understand the vascular structure of PTA patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the contact author, Wei Huang, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Arakawa T, Koizumi M, Terashima T, Honma S, Kawai K, Kodama K, Miki A (2007) Two anatomical autopsy cases of direct communication between a persistent primitive trigeminal artery and an anterior inferior cerebellar artery. Ann Anat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2006.11.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arráez-Aybar LA, Fuentes-Redondo T, Millán JM (2016) Persistent trigeminal artery: a cross-sectional study based on over 3 years conventional angiography CT angiography and MR angiography images. Surg Radiol Anat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1578-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azab W, Delashaw J, Mohammed M (2012) Persistent primitive trigeminal artery: a review. Turk Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.4427-11.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bai M, Guo Q, Li S (2013) Persistent trigeminal artery/persistent trigeminal artery variant and coexisting variants of the head and neck vessels diagnosed using 3 T MRA. Clin Radio. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brzegowy K, Pękala PA, Zarzecki MP, Pękala JR, Roy J, Aziz HM, Tubbs RS, Walocha JA, Tomaszewski KA, Mikos M (2020) Prevalence and clinical implications of the primitive trigeminal artery and its variants: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 133:e401–e411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coulier B (2018) Duplication of the Posterior Cerebral Artery (PCA) or “True Fetal PCA”: An Extremely Rare Variant. J Belg Soc Radiol 102:29. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Deniz MA, Turmak M, Hattapoğlu S, Tekinhatun M (2022) Persistent trigeminal artery detected on computed tomography angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 44:715–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02960-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hattori T, Inoue S, Sakai N (1997) Fenestration of the basilar artery associated with persistent primitive trigeminal artery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 37:841–843. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.37.841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong JM, Chung CS, Bang OY, Yong SW, Joo IS, Huh K (2009) Vertebral artery dominance contributes to basilar artery curvature and peri-vertebrobasilar junctional infarcts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.169805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim MJ, Kim MS (2015) Persistent primitive trigeminal artery: analysis of anatomical characteristics and clinical significances. Surg Radiol Anat 37:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1318-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu YB, Feng PY, Zhang TZ, Sun J, Yang HX (2022) A Study on the Persistent Trigeminal Artery and Its Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Angiograph Images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 46:645–650. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKenzie JD, Dean BL, Flom RA (1996) Trigeminal-cavernous fistula: Saltzman anatomy revisited. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:280–282

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Meckel S, Spittau B, McAuliffe W (2013) The persistent trigeminal artery: development, imaging anatomy, variants, and associated vascular pathologies. Neuroradiology 55:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0995-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Namba K (2017) Carotid-vertebrobasilar anastomoses with reference to their segmental property. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 57:267–277. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2017-0050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohshiro S, Inoue T, Hamada Y, Matsuno H (1993) Branches of the persistent primitive trigeminal artery–an autopsy case. Neurosurgery 32:144–148. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199301000-00025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’uchi E, O’uchi T, (2010) Persistent primitive trigeminal arteries (PTA) and its variant (PTAV): analysis of 103 cases detected in 16,415 cases of MRA over 3 years. Neuroradiology 52:1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0669-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piotin M, Miralbés S, Cattin F, Marchal H, Amor-Sahli M, Moulin T, Bonneville JF (1996) MRI and MR angiography of persistent trigeminal artery. Neuroradiology 38:730–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez-Hernandez LA, Martinez P, Baracaldo I, Alonso M, Lopez-Mena D, Montenegro Rosales HA (2022) Persistent trigeminal artery associated with an occipital arteriovenous malformation: a case report and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 44:1271–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-03003-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Salas E, Ziyal IM, Sekhar LN, Wright DC (1998) Persistent trigeminal artery: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 43:557–562. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199809000-00082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saltzman GF (1959) Patent primitive trigeminal artery studied by cerebral angiography. Acta radiol 51:329–336. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016925909171103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen J, Tourje J, Chang EE, Mamelak AN, Wu AW (2016) Persistent trigeminal artery in endonasal resection of skull base tumors: a systematic review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 77:449–455. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1581066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutton D (1950) Anomalous carotid-basilar anastomosis. Br J Radiol 23:617–619. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-23-274-617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tyagi G, Sadashiva N, Konar S, Aravinda HR, Saini J, Shukla D, Devi BI (2020) Persistent trigeminal artery: neuroanatomic and clinical relevance. World Neurosurg 134:e214–e223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchino A, Saito N, Okada Y, Kozawa E, Mizukoshi W, Inoue K, Takahashi M (2012) Persistent trigeminal artery and its variants on MR angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 34:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0848-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasović L, Jovanović I, Ugrenović S, Vlajković S, Jovanović P, Stojanović V (2012) Trigeminal artery: a review of normal and pathological features. Childs Nerv Syst 28:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1622-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang YH, Yu JL (2022) Clinical importance of the persistent primitive trigeminal artery in vascular lesions and its role in endovascular treatment. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.928608

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Weon YC, Choi SH, Hwang JC, Shin SH, Kwon WJ, Kang BS (2011) Classification of persistent primitive trigeminal artery (PPTA): a reconsideration based on MRA. Acta Radiol 52:1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang ZY, Sato S, Tian ZH, Tang WX, Liu ZJ (2016) A rare case of persistent primitive trigeminal artery with multiple anomalies of cerebral vessels. Chin Med J (Engl) 129:3008–3009. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.195471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WH and YF contributed to the study conception and design. YZ and YS contributed to material preparation and data collection. Data analysis was performed by WH and YYZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WH and YZ. The manuscript was edited by YF. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Feng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the ethics committee of our local institution (Date: 12.22.2022. Number: KY-2022-144-01).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhuang, Y. et al. An anatomical study of persistent trigeminal artery detected by computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography: proposal for a modified classification and a novel basilar artery grading system. Surg Radiol Anat 45, 947–957 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03164-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03164-1

Keywords

Navigation