Abstract
Purpose
Brain expansion during ontogeny has been identified as a key factor for explaining the growth pattern of neurocranial bones. However, the dynamics of this relation are only partially understood and a detailed characterization of integrated morphological changes of the brain and the neurocranium along ontogeny is still lacking. The aim of this study was to model the effect of brain growth on cranial bones by means of finite-element analysis (FEA) and geometric morphometric techniques.
Methods
First, we described the postnatal changes in brain size and shape by digitizing coordinates of 3D semilandmarks on cranial endocasts, as a proxy of brain, segmented from CT-scans of an ontogenetic sample. Then, two scenarios of brain growth were simulated: one in which brain volume increases with the same magnitude in all directions, and other that includes the information on the relative expansion of brain regions obtained from morphometric analysis.
Results
Results indicate that in the first model, in which a uniform pressure is applied, the largest displacements were localized in the sutures, especially in the anterior and posterior fontanels, as well as the metopic suture. When information of brain relative growth was introduced into the model, displacements were also concentrated in the lambda region although the values along both sides of the neurocranium (parietal and temporal bones) were larger than under the first scenario.
Conclusion
In sum, we propose a realistic approach to the use of FEA based on morphometric data that offered different results to more simplified models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge K, Kane AA, Marsh JL et al (2005) Brain morphology in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 285:690–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.20201
Bastir M, Rosas A, Stringer C et al (2010) Effects of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution. J Hum Evol 58:424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.03.001
Bienvenu T, Guy F, Coudyzer W et al (2011) Assessing endocranial variations in great apes and humans using 3D data from virtual endocasts. Am J Phys Anthropol 145:231–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21488
Borghi A, Rodriguez-Florez N, Rodgers W et al (2018) Spring assisted cranioplasty: a patient specific computational model. Med Eng Phys 53:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.01.001
Bruner E (2018) The brain, the braincase, and the morphospace. In: Bruner E (ed) Digital endocasts. Springer Japan, Tokyo, pp 93–114
Buikstra JA, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection of human remains. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville
Courchesne E, Chisum HJ, Townsend J et al (2000) Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology 216:672–682. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au37672
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
Gunz P, Neubauer S, Golovanova L et al (2012) A uniquely modern human pattern of endocranial development. Insights from a new cranial reconstruction of the Neandertal newborn from Mezmaiskaya. J Hum Evol 62:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.013
Jin J, Shahbazi S, Lloyd J et al (2014) Hybrid simulation of brain–skull growth. Simulation 90:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549713516691
Li Z, Hu J, Reed MP et al (2011) Development, validation, and application of a parametric pediatric head finite element model for impact simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 39:2984–2997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0409-z
Libby J, Marghoub A, Johnson D et al (2017) Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model. J R Soc Interface 14:20170202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0202
Lieberman DE (2011) The evolution of human head. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts
Likus W, Bajor G, Gruszczyńska K et al (2014) Cephalic index in the first three years of life: study of children with normal brain development based on computed tomography. Sci World J 2014:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/502836
Malde O, Libby J, Moazen M (2019) An overview of modelling craniosynostosis using the finite element method. Mol Syndromol 10:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490833
Marcé-Nogué J, Fortuni Terricabras J, Gil Espert L, Sánchez Romero M (2015) Improving mesh generation in finite element analysis for functional morphology approaches. Spanish J Palaeontol 30:117–132
Margulies SS, Thibault KL (2000) Infant skull and suture properties: Measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury. J Biomech Eng 122:364–371. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1287160
Moffett EA, Aldridge K (2014) Size of the anterior fontanelle: three-Dimensional measurement of a key trait in human evolution. Anat Rec 297:234–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22830
Moss ML, Young RW (1960) A functional approach to craniology. Am J Phys Anthropol 18:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330180406
Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Uchikawa Y et al (2010) A biomechanical study on the effect of premature fusion of the frontosphenoidal suture on orbit asymmetry in unilateral coronal synostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 47:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1597/08-164.1
Neubauer S, Gunz P, Hublin J-J (2009) The pattern of endocranial ontogenetic shape changes in humans. J Anat 215:240–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01106.x
Opperman LA (2000) Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn 219:472–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999%3c:AID-DVDY1073%3e3.0.CO;2-F
Percival CJ, Devine J, Darwin BC et al (2019) The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses. J Anat 234:917–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12973
Richtsmeier JT, Flaherty K (2014) Hand in glove: brain and skull in development and dysmorphogenesis. Acta Neuropathol 125:469–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1104-y.Hand
Schlager S (2017) Morpho and Rvcg—shape analysis in R. In: Zheng G (ed) Statistical shape and deformation analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 217–256
Shapiro D, Richtsmeier JT (1997) Brief communication: a sample of pediatric skulls available for study. Am J Phys Anthropol 103:415–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199707)103:3%3c415:AID-AJPA11%3e3.0.CO;2-3
Virchow R (1851) Uber den Cretinismus, namentlich in franken und ueber pathologische schadelformen. Ver Physikalisch Med Ges Wurzburg 2:230
Weickenmeier J, Fischer C, Carter D et al (2017) Dimensional, geometrical, and physical constraints in skull growth. Phys Rev Lett 118:248101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.248101
Wolański W, Larysz D, Gzik M, Kawlewska E (2013) Modeling and biomechanical analysis of craniosynostosis correction with the use of finite element method. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 29:916–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2506
Zhang G, Tan H, Qian X et al (2016) A Systematic approach to predicting spring force for sagittal craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg 27:636–643. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002590
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Joan Richtsmeier for image sharing. This work was funded by the Universidad Nacional de La Plata PI 792 and 787), the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, PIP 0729) and the Agencia Nacional para la Promoción de la Ciencia y Tecnología (ANPCyT, PICT 2134 and PICT 1810). J.M.-N. was supported by the DFG, German Research Foundation, KA 1525/9-2 and acknowledges the CERCA programme (Generalitat de Catalunya).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JB-A project development, data analysis (geometric morphometrics), manuscript writing. NB data collection (endocasts’ reconstructions and digitization of landmarks and semilandmarks). JMN data analysis (finite-element analysis). VB project development, manuscript writing. PNG project development and supervision, data analysis (geometric morphometrics), manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbeito-Andrés, J., Bonfili, N., Nogué, J.M. et al. Modeling the effect of brain growth on cranial bones using finite-element analysis and geometric morphometrics. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 741–748 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02466-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02466-y