Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this study was to investigate three methods of prediction of the bone quality of the distal humerus: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), Ct-Scan and plain radiographs.
Materials and methods
The bone mineral density (BMD) of 21 cadaveric distal humerus was determined using DEXA at two levels. Then a CT-scan and anteroposterior radiographs were taken. The cancellous density was estimated with the CT-scan. The cortico-medullar index (CMI) was calculated as cortical thickness divided by total bone thickness on AP views.
Results
A significant positive correlation was found between the BMD of the epiphysis and the CMI of r = 0.61. The mean BMD of the distal humerus was 0.559 g/cm2. Male specimens showed a significantly higher BMD than females. The mean CMI of diaphysis was 1.431 and the mean BMD of the metaphysis region was 0.444 g/cm2.
Discussion
More than a direct evaluation of the bone density with a CT-scan, the CMI of the distal humerus diaphysis is a predictor of the bone quality of the distal humerus. This should be of great help for the surgeon’s decision making in case of fracture of the distal humerus, as open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of fractures of the distal humerus can lead to failure due to poor bone quality.
Level of evidence
Basic Science Study, Anatomic Cadaver Study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom RA (1980) A comparative estimation of the combined cortical thickness of various bone sites. Skeletal Radiol 5:167–170
Damilakis J, Maris TG, Karantanas AH (2007) An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques. Eur Radiol 17:1591–1602
Egol KA, Tsai P, Vazques O, Tejwani NC (2011) Comparison of functional outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty vs plate fixation for distal humerus fractures in osteoporotic elbows. Am J Orthop 40:67–71
Ehlinger M, Gicquel P, Clavert P, Bonnomet F, Kempf JF (2004) A new implant for proximal humeral fracture: experimental study of the basket plate. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90:16–25
Frankle MA, Herscovici DJ, DiPasquale TG, Vasey MB, Sanders RW (2003) A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65. J Orthop Trauma 17:473–480
Galano GJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN (2010) Current treatment strategies for bicolumnar distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:20–30
LaPorte DM, Murphy MS, Moore JR (2008) Distal humerus nonunion after failed internal fixation: reconstruction with total elbow arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 37:531–534
Linde F, Sørensen HC (1993) The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 26:1249–1252
Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2009) Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int 20:1131–1140
Meema HE, Meema S (1969) Cortical bone mineral density versus cortical thickness in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a roentgenologic-densitometric study. J Am Geriat Soc 17:120–141
Meema HE, Meema S (1963) Measurable roentgenologic changes in some peripheral bone in senile osteoporosis. J Am Geriat Soc 11:1170–1182
Mirsky EC, Einhorn TA (1998) Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg 80:1687–1698
Park SH, Kim SJ, Park BC, Suh KJ, Lee JY, Park CW, Shin IH, Jeon IH (2010) Three-dimensional osseous micro-architecture of the distal humerus: implications for internal fixation of osteoporotic fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:244–250
Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Aschman RB (1995) Relation of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 17:347–355
Srinivasan K, Agarwal M, Matthews SJ, Giannoudis PV (2005) Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: is internal fixation the treatment of choice? Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:222–230
Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G (2008) Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res 26:778–784
Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2003) The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg 85:611–617
Virtama P, Telkka A (1962) Cortical thickness as an estimate of mineral content of human humerous and femur. Br J Radiol 35:632–633
Virtama P, Telkkae A (1962) Cortical thickness as an estimate of mineral con- tent of human humerus and femur. Br J Radiol 35:632–633
Yamada M, Briot J, Pedrono A, Sans N, Mansat P, Mansat M, Swider P (2007) Age- and gender-related distribution of bone tissue of osteoporotic humeral head using computed tomography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:596–602
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clavert, P., Javier, RM., Charrissoux, J.L. et al. How to determine the bone mineral density of the distal humerus with radiographic tools?. Surg Radiol Anat 38, 389–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1569-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1569-6