Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of cortico-cancellous bone along the iliac crest: focus on graft harvesting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The iliac crests are rich sources of cortical as well as cancellous bone. Though the proportions of cortico-cancellous tissue vary along the crest, a detailed morphometric characterization of the osseous tissue along the iliac crest is hard to come across in literature. This paucity of anatomical data on the quantity of cortical and cancellous bone along the iliac blade has prompted this study.

Methods

Male [n = 40] and female [n = 40] pelvises were obtained from fresh cadaveric material. Two parallel strips of bones, each 15 mm high, were cut along the iliac crest. Each of these segments was divided into three (anterior, intermediate and posterior) approximately equal parts and measured for: (a) length, (b) width, (c) thickness, of the outer and inner shell of cortical bones, (d) thickness of the cancellous tissue between the outer and inner cortices, and (e) the volume of available cancellous bone in each part was calculated.

Results

The upper segment was found to be wider than the lower segment. The intermediate part of the upper segment was the widest and possessed the thickest and most voluminous content of cancellous tissue. The posterior parts of both the segments were thin. Cortical bones gradually thinned out posteriorly. The outer cortices were thicker than the inner ones. Parameters in the males generally measured higher than the females; the right side had higher values than the left.

Conclusions

Strategies for graft harvesting from the iliac crests should be based upon the morphological assessment of the bone at the desired site of harvest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, Shepherd L, Holtom P (2002) Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:716–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL, Davino NA (1996) Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:300–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity, a statistical evaluation. Spine 20:1055–1060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bimmel R, Govaers K (2006) Does harvesting of iliac bone grafts with an acetabular reamer reduce complication rate? Acta Orthop Belg 72:598–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burchardt H (1983) The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop 174:28–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burstein FD, Simms C, Cohen SR, Work F, Paschal M (2000) Iliac crest bone graft harvesting techniques: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:34–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burwell RG (1969) The fate of bone grafts. In: Apley AG (ed) Recent advances in orthopaedics. Churchill, London, pp 115–207

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burwell RG (1976) The fate of freeze dried bone allo-grafts. Transplant Proc 8(suppl.):95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Enneking WF, Burchardt MS, Puhl JJ, Piotrowski G (1975) Physical and biological aspects of repair in dog cortical-bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg A57:237–252

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friedlaender GE (1987) Bone grafts. the basic science rationale for clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg A69:786–790

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson E (1966) Results of the surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 48A:619–642

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henzel JH, Mohr GC, vonGierke HE (1968) Reappraisal of biodynamic implications of human ejections. Aerospace Med 39:231–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu R, Hearn T, Yang J (1995) Bone graft harvest site as a determinant of iliac crest strength. Clin Orthop 310:252–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kessler P, Thorwarth M, Bloch-Birkholz A, Nkenke E, Neukam FW (2005) Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest—comparison of the anterior and posterior sites. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kreibich DN, Scott IR, Wells JM, Saleh M (1994) Donor site morbidity at the iliac crest: comparison of percutaneous and open methods. J Bone Joint Surg 76-B:847–848

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stringa G, Mignani G (1967) Microradiographic investigation of bone grafts in man. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 99:1–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. White AA, Hirsch C (1971) An experimental study of the immediate load bearing capacity of some commonly used iliac bone grafts. Acta Orthop Scand 42:482–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. White AA, Jupiter J, Southwick WO, Panjabi MM (1973) An experimental study of the immediate load bearing capacity of three surgical constructions for anterior spine fusions. Clin Orthop 91:21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White AA, Panjabi MM (1978) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 18–23

    Google Scholar 

  20. White AA, Southwick WO, Deponte RJ, Gainor JW, Hardy R (1973) Relief of pain by anterior cervical spine fusion for spondylosis. J Bone Joint Surg 55:525–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No financial interest was involved between the author and any individual or organization. No organization sponsored this research. The study was conducted on cadaveric material and all regulations involved with research on cadaveric material were complied with.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest involved in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niladri Kumar Mahato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahato, N.K. Characterization of cortico-cancellous bone along the iliac crest: focus on graft harvesting. Surg Radiol Anat 33, 433–437 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0752-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0752-z

Keywords

Navigation