Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional in vivo displacements of the shoulder complex from biplanar radiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to adapt roentgen photogrammetry to in vivo studies of shoulder skeletal motion during arm elevation in the scapular plane. Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have been published describing shoulder bone movements. They involve plain radiographic measurements and utilize a three-dimensional (3D) approach. Measurements are either direct using pins implanted in bones, or indirect recording points on medical images. Roentgen photogrammetry locates points in space from two projections obtained from two different radiographic incidences. The technique has been applied in vivo by implanting metallic balls in bones. However, to be used as a standard clinical procedure, the technique must be adapted to be less invasive. In vivo photogrammetric reconstruction of known points in 3D space requires that the subject is strictly motionless between the successive radiographic exposures or that the exposures are obtained simultaneously. Methods used in this study were developed to allow subsequent exposures to be used for analysis. Numerical tools have been developed to align the two projections of a point in 3D space which have moved slightly between two successive exposures. The standard photogrammetric technique is completed by geometric modeling of the shoulder complex and humerus, and by the control of their mutual proximity at the level of joints. Bones are modeled as a set of simple volumes linked together using geometric shapes described by shape parameters. The coincidence between real bone contours and radiographic projections of the modeled bone gives the values of the shape parameters and the accurate location in space. Results focus on two different topics: errors related to the use of roentgen photogrammetry with successive exposures, and results obtained by applying roentgen photogrammetry to the in vivo shoulder complex. Results describing shoulder bone and joint displacements are presented for comparison with previously published results. The technique of roentgen photogrammetry can successfully be applied to patients. The radiographic protocol is simple, and data can be obtained easily and quickly from the digitized films. The data obtained from asymptomatic shoulders compared favorably with published values. Future research will focus on comparisons between kinematics of the symptomatic and asymptomatic contralateral limbs in volunteers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a―c
Fig. 2
Fig. 3 a
Fig. 4 a
Fig. 5 a
Fig. 6 a
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. André B, Dansereau J, Labelle H (1994) Optimized vertical stereo base radiographic setup for the clinical three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine. J Biomech 278:1023–1035

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berthonnaud E, Remy D, Moyen B, Carrillon Y, Dimnet J (1998). Inferior limb stereoradiography: technique and applications in clinical practice. J Biomech 31 [Suppl 1]:116

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berthonnaud E, Moyen B, Dimnet J (2000) Stereoradiographic techniques applied to three dimensional clinical measurements. Automed J 18:321–363

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berthonnaud E, Chotel F, Dimnet J (2002) The anatomic patterns of the lower limb from three dimensional radiographic reconstruction of bones (3DRRB). ITBM-RBM 23:290–302

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown RH, Burstein AH, Nash CL, Schock CC (1976) Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiograph technique. J Biomech 9:355–365

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chao EY, Morrey BF (1978) Three-dimensional rotation of the elbow. J Biomech 11:57–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engin AE, Chen SM (1986) Statistical database for the biomechanical properties of human shoulder complex. I. Kinematics of the shoulder complex. J Biomech Eng 108:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fung M, Kato S, Barrance PJ, Elias JJ, McFarland EG, Nobuhara K, Chao EY (2001) Scapular and clavicular kinematics during humeral elevation: a study with cadavers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:278–285

    Google Scholar 

  9. Högefors C, Peterson B, Sigholm G, Herberts P (1991) Biomechanical model of the human shoulder joint. II. The shoulder rhythm. J Biomech 8:699–709

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inman VT, Saunders M, Abbot LC (1944) Observations on the function of the shoulder joint. J Bone Joint Surg 26:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson GR, Buxton T, House D, Bogduk N (1992) Use of uncalibrated biplanar radiography for the measurement of skeletal coordinates around the shoulder girdle. J Biomed Eng 14:490–494

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karlsson D, Peterson B (1992) Towards a model for force predictions in the human shoulder. J Biomech 25:189–199

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luca de CJ, Forrest WJ (1973) Force analysis of individual muscles acting simultaneously on the shoulder joint during isometric abduction. J Biomech 6:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  14. McClure PW, Michener LA, Sennett BJ, Karduna AR (2001) Direct 3-imensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moriwaki M (1992) Analysis of three-dimensional motion of the scapula and the glenohumeral joint. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 66:675–687

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ozaki J (1980) Shoulder mechanism: study based on cineradiography and radiography with the arm elevated. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 54:1679–1692

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poppen NK, Walker PS (1976) Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:195–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scepi M, Faure JP, Ridoux N, Kamina P, Richer JP (2004) A three-dimensional model of the shoulder girdle. Forces developed in deltoid and supraspinatus muscles during abduction. Surg Radiol Anat 26:290–296

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selvik G (1974) A roentgenstereophotogrammetric method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Thesis, University of Lund, Sweden

  20. Stokdijk M, Eilers PH, Nagels J, Rozing PM (2003) External rotation in the glenohumeral joint during elevation of the arm. Clin Biomech 18:296–302

    Google Scholar 

  21. Talkhani IS, Kelly CP (2001) Movement analysis of asymptomatic normal shoulders: a preliminary study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:580–584

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tümer ST, Engin AE (1989) Three-dimensional kinematic modeling of the human shoulder complex. II. Mathematical modeling and solution via optimization. J Biomech Eng 111:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Helm FC (1994) Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 27:527–550

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van der Helm FC (1994) a finite musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 27:551–569

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi K, Sher JS, Andersen WK, Garretson R, Uribe JW, Hechtman K, Neviaser RJ (2000) Glenohumeral motion in patients with rotator cuff tears: a comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:6–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Berthonnaud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berthonnaud, E., Herzberg, G., Zhao, K.D. et al. Three-dimensional in vivo displacements of the shoulder complex from biplanar radiography. Surg Radiol Anat 27, 214–222 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0315-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0315-x

Keywords

Navigation