Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technical note: the design of a stereotactic frame for direct MRI-anatomical correlation of the brachial plexus

  • Radiologic Anatomy
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditions to visualize discrete alterations of brachial plexus components, as part of a biomechanical study of minor nerve compression syndromes. A method was developed allowing direct comparison between the MRI image and the subsequently obtained matching anatomic section of the same specimen. We designed a stereotactic frame to obtain the precise orientation of the MRI plane with reference to the specimen and adapted a vertical band saw for multiplanar sectioning of cadaveric specimens. Two cadaveric upper quadrants were examined by MRI (TR 450 ms, TE 13 ms, pixel matrix 512 × 512 and FOV 23–26 cm) and anatomical slices were produced. One specimen was sectioned axially, while the second specimen was sectioned in an oblique plane corresponding to the natural longitudinal axis of the upper part of the brachial plexus. MR images and the corresponding slices exhibited a strong correlation. This correlation was checked by using vitamin A pearls as landmarks. MR images revealed more detail after the correlating anatomical slices were analyzed. The present study shows that the method is suited for direct MRI-anatomic comparison of the brachial plexus and is also proposed for application to other topographical regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allman KH, Horch R, Uhl M et al (1997) Imaging of the carpal tunnel. Eur J Radiol 25:141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett LW, Ullis K, Seeger LL, Rauschning W (1991) Anatomy of the hip: correlation of coronal and sagittal cadaver cryomicrosections with magnetic resonance images. Surg Radiol Anat 13:301–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blair DN, Rapoport S, Sostman HD, Blair OC (1987) Normal brachial plexus: MR imaging. Radiology 165:763–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen DS, Lustgarten JH, Miller E, Khandji AG, Goodman RR (1995) Effects of coregistration of MR to CT images on MR stereotactic accuracy. J Neurosurg 82:772–779

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Demondion X, Boutry N, Drizenko A, Paul C, Francke JP, Cotten A (2000) Thoracic outlet: anatomic correlation with MR imaging. AJR 175:417–422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greening J, Smart S, Leary R, Hall-Craggs M, O’Higgins P, Lynn B (1999) Reduced movement of median nerve in carpal tunnel during wrist flexion in patients with non-specific arm pain. The Lancet 354:217–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes CE, Tsuruda JS, Mathis CM, Maravilla KR, Kliot M, Filler AG (1997) Brachial plexus: MR imaging with a dedicated phased array of surface coils. Radiology 203:286–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodler J, Trudell D, Kang SH, Kjellin I, Resnick D (1992) Inexpensive technique for performing magnetic resonance-pathologic correlation in cadavers. Investigative radiology 27:323–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodler J, Trudell D, Pathria MN, Resnick D (1992) Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers. AJR 159:351–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holliday J, Saxon R, Lufkin RB, Rauschning W, Reicher M, Bassett L, Hanafee W, Barbaric Z, Sarti D, Glenn W (1985) Anatomic correlations of magnetic resonance images with cadaver cryosections. Radiographics 5:887–890

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyodoh K, Hyodoh H, Akiba H, Tamakawa M, Nakamura N, Yama N, Syonai T, Tsuchimoto T, Ohmoto H, Ogasawara M, Bando M, Furuse M, Hareyama M (2002) Brachial plexus: normal anatomy and pathological conditions. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 31:179–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iyer RB, Fenstermacher MJ, Libshitz HI (1996) MR Imaging of the treated brachial plexus. AJR 167:225–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamman RL, Go KG, Stomp GP, Hulstaert CE, Berendsen HCJ (1985) Changes of relaxation times T1 and T2 in rat tissues after biopsy and fixation. Magn Reson Imaging 3:245–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lufkin R, Rauschning W, Seeger L, Bassett L, Hanafee W (1987) Anatomic correlation of cadaver cryomicrotomy with magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 9:299–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackenzie R, Shah NJ, Doran S, Dixon AK (1993) Technical note: a multi-purpose ruler for magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 66:545–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maravilla KR, Bowen BC (1998) Imaging of the peripheral nervous system: evaluation of peripheral neuropathy and plexopathy. AJNR 19:1011–1023

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maurer CR, Aboutanos GB, Dawant BM, Gadamsetty S, Margolin RA, Maciunas RJ, Fitzpatrick JM (1996) Technical note. Effect of geometrical distortion correction in MR on image registration accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:666–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Montanari N, Spina V, Torricelli P, Marongiu MC, Bertolani M, De Santis M, Romagnoli R (1996) Magnetic resonance of the brachial plexus: anatomy and study technique. Radiol Med 91:714–721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nixon JR, Miller GM, Okazaki H, Gomez MR (1989) Cerebral tuberous sclerosis: postmortem magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic anatomy. Mayo Clin Proc 64:305–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Panegyres PK, Moore N, Gibson R, Rushworth G, Donaghy M (1993) Thoracic outlet syndromes and magnetic resonance imaging. Brain 116:823–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peschers UM, Delancey JOL, Fritsch H, Quint LE, Prince MR (1997) Cross-sectional imaging anatomy of the anal sphincters. Obstet Gynecol 90:839–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Posniak HV, Olson MC, Dudiak CM, Wisniewski R, O’Malley C (1993) MR imaging of the brachial plexus. AJR 161:373–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rapoport S, Blair DN, McCarthy SM, Desser TS, Hammers LW, Sostman HD (1988) Brachial plexus: correlation of MR imaging with CT and pathologic findings. Radiology 167:161–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rousseau J, Clarysse P, Blond S, Gibon D, Vasseur C, Marchandise X (1991) Validation of a new method for stereotactic localization using MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:291–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schweitzer ME, Hodler J, Cervilla V, Resnick D (1992) Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy with MR correlation. AJR 158:1087–1090

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sumanaweera TS, AdlerJR, Napel S, Glover GH (1994) Characterization of spatial distortion in MRI and its implications for stereotactic surgery. J Neurosurg 35:696–704

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thickman DI, Kundel HL, Wolf G (1983) Nuclear magnetic resonance characteristics of fresh and fixed tissue: the effect of elapsed time. Radiology 148:183–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas M, Steinke H, Schulz T (2004) A direct comparison of MR images and thin-layer plastination of the shoulder in the apprehension-test position. Surg Radiol Anat 26:110–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DM, Kemeny AA (1996) A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery 38:170–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu C, Petrovich Z, Apuzzo MLJ (2001) An image fusion study of the geometric accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic localization system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2:42–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. A. De Smet and to Prof. P. Simoens, Department of Morphology, Ughent for their skilled technical assistance. We also thank Dr. E. Barbaix for his advice and Prof. Y. Dedeene for reflecting on the mathematical concept.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Van Hoof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Hoof, T., Mabilde, C., Leybaert, L. et al. Technical note: the design of a stereotactic frame for direct MRI-anatomical correlation of the brachial plexus. Surg Radiol Anat 27, 548–556 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0049-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0049-9

Keywords

Navigation