Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of irrigated biomass sorghum for energy production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New cultivars of sorghum for biomass energy production are currently available. This crop has a positive energy balance being irrigation water the largest energy consumer during the growing cycle. Thence, it is important to know the biomass sorghum water requirements, in order to minimize irrigation losses, thus saving water and energy. The objective of this study was to quantify the water use and crop coefficients of irrigated biomass sorghum without soil water limitations during two growing seasons. A weighing lysimeter located in Albacete (Central Spain) was used to measure the daily biomass sorghum evapotranspiration (ETc) throughout the growing season under sprinkler irrigation. Seasonal lysimeter ETc was 721 mm in 2007 and 691 mm in 2010. The 4 % higher ETc value in 2007 was due to an 8 % higher evaporative demand in that year. Maximum average K c values of 1.17 in 2007 and 1.21 in 2010 were reached during the mid-season stage. The average K c values for the 2 years of study were K c-ini: 0.64 and K c-mid: 1.19. The seasonal evaporation component was estimated to be about 18 % of ETc. The average basal K c (K cb) values for the two study years were K cb-ini: 0.11 and K cb-mid: 1.17. The good linear relationship found between K cb values and the fraction of ground cover (f c) and the excellent agreement found between Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and different biophysical parameters, such as K cb and f c, will allow monitoring and estimating the spatially distributed water requirements of biomass sorghum at field and regional scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 56, Rome, 300 pp

  • Allen RG, Wright JL, Pruitt WO, Pereira LS, Jensen ME (2007) Water requirements. In: Hoffman GJ, Evans RG, Jensen ME, Martin DL, Elliott RL (eds) Design and operation of farm irrigation systems, 2nd edn. ASABE, St Joseph, pp 208–288

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Armesto AP, Lafarga A, Eslava V (2010) Sorgo para Biomasa. Resultados de 10 años de experimentación. Navarra Agraria, pp 42–44 (in Spanish)

  • Bashir MA, Hata T, Tanakamaru H, Abdelhadi AW, Tada A (2008) Satellite-based energy balance model to estimate seasonal evapotranspiration for irrigated sorghum: a case study from the Gezira scheme, Sudan. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:1129–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bausch WC, Neale CMU (1987) Crop coefficients derived from reflected canopy radiation: a concept. Trans ASAE 30:703–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calera A, Martínez C, Melia J (2001) A procedure for obtaining green plant cover: relation to NDVI in a case study for barley. Int J Remote Sens 22:3357–3362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos I, Neale CMU, Calera A, Balbontin C, Gonzalez-Piqueras J (2010) Assessing satellite-based basal crop coefficients for irrigated grapes (Vitis vinifera L). Agric Water Manag 98:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury BJ, Ahmed NU, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Reginato CS (1994) Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations. Remote Sens Environ 50:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihlar J, Dobson MC, Schmugge T, Hoogeboom P, Janse ARP, Baret F, Guyot G, Le Toan T, Pampaloni P (1987) Procedures for the description of agricultural crops and soils in optical and microwave remote sensing studies. Int J Remote Sens 8:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi PD, Evett SR, Howell TA, Gowda PH, O’Shaughnessy SA, Tolk JA, Kustas WP, Anderson MC (2012) Two-source energy balance model-refinements and lysimeter tests in the Southern High Plains. Trans ASABE 55(2):551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1975) Crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 24, Rome, 144 pp

  • Exelis Visual Information Solutions (2012) ENVI user’s guide. Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Farré I, Faci JM (2006) Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricult Water Manag 83:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo P, Rinaldi M (2013) Water-use efficiency of irrigated biomass sorghum in a Mediterranean environment. Span J Agricult Res 11(4):1153–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo P, Vonella AV, Ruggieri S, Rinaldi M (2011) Water and radiation use efficiencies of irrigated biomass sorghum in a Mediterranean environment. Ital J Agron 6:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Piqueras J, Calera A, Gilabert MA, Cuesta A, de la Cruz F (2004) Estimation of crop coefficients by means of optimized vegetation indices for corn. Proc SPIE 5232:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM SPSS Statistics (2012) SPSS statistical software, version 19. SPSS Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (1998) World energy outlook, 1998 edn. IEA, Paris, France

  • Jackson RD, Pinter PJ, Reginato RJ, Idso SB (1980) Hand-held radiometry. A set of notes developed for use at the workshop on hand-held radiometry. Phoenix, Arizona, February 25–26. USDA, Agricultural Reviews and Manuals 66 p

  • Jensen ME (ed) 1974 Consumptive use of water and irrigation water requirements. Report of technical communication irrigation water requirement, ASCE, New York

  • Johnson LF, Trout TJ (2012) Satellite NDVI assisted monitoring of vegetable crop evapotranspiration in California’s san Joaquin Valley. Remote Sens 4(2):439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato T, Kamichika M (2006) Determination of a crop coefficient for evapotranspiration in a sparse sorghum field. Irrig Drain 55:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieg DR, Lascano RJ (1990) Sorghum. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 719–740

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Urrea R, Martín de Santa Olalla F, Fabeiro C, Moratalla A (2006) Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate. Agric Water Manag 85:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Urrea R, Montoro A, González-Piqueras J, López-Fuster P, Fereres E (2009) Water use of spring wheat to raise water productivity. Agric Water Manag 96:1305–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Urrea R, Montoro A, Trout TJ (2014) Consumptive water use and crop coefficients of irrigated sunflower. Irrig Sci 32(2):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy RM (2005) Fields methods in remote sensing. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla DJ (2013) Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosyst Eng 114:358–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale CMU, Bausch WC (1983) Crop coefficients derived from reflected canopy radiation. ASAE Paper no 83-2527. St. Joseph, MI

  • Padilla FLM, González-Dugo MP, Gavilán P, Domínguez J (2011) Integration of vegetation indices into a water balance model to estimate evapotranspiration of wheat and corn. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1213–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1973) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Proceedings of the third ERTS symposium, NASA SP-351, I:309–317

  • Sánchez JM, López-Urrea R, Rubio E, Caselles V (2011) Determining water use of sorghum from two-source energy balance and radiometric temperatures. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:3061–3070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to soil taxonomy, 10th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlip RL, Reeves HE (1972) Growth stages of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, (L.) Moench.). Agron J 64(1):13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wani SP, Albrizio R, Vajja NR (2012) Sorghum. In: Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (eds) Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 66, Rome, 500 pp

  • Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63(11):1309–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright GC, Smith CG (1983) Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to drought stress. II. Root water uptake and water use. Aust J Agric Res 34:627–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers. This work has been funded by the Spanish Science and Innovation Ministry (Project AGL2009-13124), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2013-46862-C2-2-P and AGL2014-54201-C4-4-R), and the Education and Science Council (JCCM, Spain) (Projects PAI07-0058-5569 and PPII10-0319-8732). M. Odi-Lara acknowledges the support of the Chilean Government through the project FONDECYT (No. 3130319).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. López-Urrea.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Fereres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Urrea, R., Martínez-Molina, L., de la Cruz, F. et al. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of irrigated biomass sorghum for energy production. Irrig Sci 34, 287–296 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0503-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0503-y

Keywords

Navigation