Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Invading the Main Portal Vein: Treatment with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Portal Vein Stenting

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To retrospectively analyze the therapeutic results of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting (PTPVS) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment in 58 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) invading the main portal vein (MPV). A total of 58 procedures of PTPVS were performed, immediately after which TACE was undertaken to control HCC. The clinical effects, complications, digital subtraction angiographic appearance, stent patency rates, cumulative survival rates, and predictive factors for survival were evaluated. The Kaplan–Meyer method and the log rank test were used for survival analysis. Multivariable analysis was also conducted by the Cox proportional hazard model. No patient died during stent placement or within the first 24 h. No severe procedure-related complications were observed. After stent placement, the mean ± standard deviation portal venous pressure levels decreased from 41.43 ± 8.56 cmH2O to 37.19 ± 7.89 cmH2O (p < 0.01). At the time of analysis, 9 of the 58 patients survived. The 60-, 180-, 360-, and 720-day cumulative patency rates were 98.1%, 71.0%, 52.6%, and 42.1%, respectively, with a mean patency time of 552.9 ± 88.2 days and a median patency time of 639.00 ± 310.00 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 31.40–1246.60) days. The 60-, 180-, 360-, and 720-day cumulative survival rates for the total study population were 74.1%, 27.1%, 17.2%, and 13.8%, respectively, with a median survival time of 113 ± 27.29 (95% CI, 59.51–166.49) days. In the univariate analysis, the following six variables were significantly associated with the prognosis: (1) HCC type; (2) Child-Pugh grade; (3) MPV stenosis/occlusion; (4) arteriovenous shunt; (5) iodized oil deposition; and (6) number of TACE procedure. In addition, having diffuse-type HCC and Child-Pugh grade B disease were each independent factors associated with decreased survival time in the multivariate analysis. PTPVS-TACE is feasible and may be useful to control HCC invading the MPV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TACE:

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

PTPVS:

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

MPV:

Main portal vein

AVS:

Arteriovenous shunt

AFP:

Alpha fetoprotein

DSA:

Digital substraction angiography

PTPE:

Percutaneous transhepatic portographic embolization

PTCD:

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage

CT:

Computed tomography

US:

Ultrasonography

References

  1. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program I (1998) A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients. Hepatology 28:751–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Minagawa M, Makuuchi M (2006) Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus. World J Gastroenterol 12:7561–7567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Giannelli G, Pierri F, Trerotoli P et al (2002) Occurrence of portal vein tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma affects prognosis and survival. A retrospective clinical study of 150 cases. Hepatol Res 24:50–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Niguma T, Mimura T, Tutui N (2005) Adjuvant arterial infusion chemotherapy after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal thrombosis: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:249–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulik LM, Carr BI, Mulcahy MF et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of Y-90 radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis. Hepatology 47:71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan J, Wu ZQ, Tang ZY et al (2001) Multimodality treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with tumor thrombi in portal vein. World J Gastroenterol 7:28–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tazawa J, Maeda M, Sakai Y et al (2001) Radiation therapy in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with extensive portal vein involvement. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:660–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsukamoto T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S et al (2003) Percutaneous transhepatic metallic stent placement for malignant portal vein stenosis. Hepatogastroenterology 50:453–455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Tanaka N et al (2001) Malignant portal venous obstructions treated by stent placement: significant factors affecting patency. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 12:1407–1415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Higaki I, Hirohashi K, Kubo S et al (2000) Portal vein stenting to treat portal vein tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma. Osaka City Med J 46:99–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamakado K, Tanaka N, Nakatsuka A et al (1999) Clinical efficacy of portal vein stent placement in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading the main portal vein. J Hepatol 30:660–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shimamura Y, Gunven P, Takenaka Y et al (1988) Combined peripheral and central chemoembolization of liver tumors. Experience with lipiodol-doxorubicin and gelatin sponge (L-TAE). Cancer 61:238–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HS, Kim JS, Choi IJ et al (1997) The safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and main portal vein obstruction. A prospective controlled study. Cancer 79:2087–2094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Forner A, Hessheimer AJ, Isabel Real M, Bruix J (2006) Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 60:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kita K, Ebara M, Yoshikawa M et al (1995) Prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinomas after non-surgical treatment. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 22:977–982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiely JM, Rilling WS, Touzios JG et al (2006) Chemoembolization in patients at high risk: results and complications. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 17:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X et al (2002) Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruix J, Sala M, Llovet JM (2004) Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:S179–S188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Llovet JM, Bruix J (2003) Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 37:429–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walton GD, Schreeder MT, Rizzo J et al (1999) Hepatic artery administration of paclitaxel. Cancer Invest 17:118–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee HS, Kim JS, Choi IJ et al (1997) The safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and main portal vein obstruction—a prospective controlled study. Cancer 79:2087–2094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeon SH, Park KS, Kim YH et al (2007) Incidence and risk factors of acute hepatic failure after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Gastroenterol 50:176–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK et al (1995) Hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion: results of treatment with transcatheter oily chemoembolization. Am J Roentgenol 165:315–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshioka T, Uchida H, Kitano S et al (1997) Long-term palliative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma extending into the portal vein and bile duct by chemoembolization and metallic stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:390–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kan Z, Sato M, Ivancev K et al (1993) Distribution and effect of iodized poppyseed oil in the liver after hepatic artery embolization: experimental study in several animal species. Radiology 186:861–866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Tanaka N et al (2001) Portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic and biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension: initial experience. Radiology 220:150–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors contributed to this article in the following ways: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, J.H.W., X.B.Z.; study concepts and design, J.H.W., Z.P.Y., S.Q.; literature research, X.B.Z, J.H.W.; clinical studies, all authors; data acquisition, J.H.W, X.B.Z., S.Q.; data analysis/interpretation, all authors; statistical analysis, all authors; manuscript preparation, X.B.Z, J.H.W.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, editing, revision/review, and final version approval, all authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Hua Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, XB., Wang, JH., Yan, ZP. et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Invading the Main Portal Vein: Treatment with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Portal Vein Stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32, 52–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9454-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9454-x

Keywords

Navigation