Skip to main content
Log in

Transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with segmental portal vein tumour thrombus

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with segmental or subsegmental portal vein tumour thrombus (sPVTT) in patients with preserved hepatic function, and to address the efficacy of additional chemoinfusion after TACE (TACE+CI).

Methods

From January 2003 to December 2012, TACE was conducted on 81 patients with Child-Pugh score ≤7 who had HCC with sPVTT. Thirty-one of them underwent TACE+CI. The overall survival (OS) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. The efficacy of TACE+CI was appraised after adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results

The OS after TACE (median, 15.5 months) was significantly related with aspartate aminotransferase (hazard ratio [HR], 1.011), modified Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage D (HR, 2.841), extrahepatic spread (HR, 4.862), and TACE+CI (HR, .367). The SAE incidence was significantly associated with modified BCLC stages (HR, 10.174 [proper-C] and 24.000 [D]). After IPTW adjustment, TACE+CI significantly improved OS (p = .028; HR, .511), but the SAE incidence was not significantly altered (p = .737; HR, .819).

Conclusions

TACE can be an effective and safe treatment option for HCC with sPVTT in patients with preserved hepatic function. Furthermore, additional chemoinfusion can enhance the therapeutic efficacy while maintaining the safety.

Key Points

TACE is effective and safe for treating HCC with sPVTT.

Modified BCLC stages can stratify the risk and benefit of TACE.

Additional chemoinfusion can enhance the therapeutic efficacy while maintaining the safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

BCLC:

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperation Oncology Group

PVTT:

Portal vein tumour thrombus

sPVTT:

Segmental or subsegmental portal vein tumour thrombus

CT:

Computed tomography

cTACE:

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization

TACE+CI:

Transarterial chemoembolization plus additional transarterial chemoinfusion

CSPH:

Clinically significant portal hypertension

EHS:

Extrahepatic spread

MELD:

Model for End-stage Liver Disease

OS:

Overall survival

AE:

Adverse event

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

SAE:

Serious adverse event

IPTW:

Inverse probability of treatment weighting

CI:

Confidence interval

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

HR:

Hazard ratio

References

  1. Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Reresarch and Treatment of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Forner A, Gilabert M, Bruix J, Raoul JL (2014) Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:525–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF et al (2012) Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis 32:348–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinmann A, Koch S, Sprinzl M et al (2015) Survival analysis of proposed BCLC-B subgroups in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Liver Int 35:591–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HC, Lee JH, Chung JW et al (2013) Transarterial chemoembolization with additional cisplatin infusion for hepatocellular carcinoma invading the hepatic vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:274–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung GE, Lee JH, Kim HY et al (2011) Transarterial chemoembolization can be safely performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading the main portal vein and may improve the overall survival. Radiology 258:627–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miraglia R, Pietrosi G, Maruzzelli L et al (2007) Efficacy of transcatheter embolization/chemoembolization (TAE/TACE) for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 13:2952–2955

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sieghart W, Hucke F, Peck-Radosavljevic M (2015) Transarterial chemoembolization: Modalities, indication, and patient selection. J Hepatol 62:1187–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xue TC, Xie XY, Zhang L, Yin X, Zhang BH, Ren ZG (2013) Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 13:60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim KM, Kim JH, Park IS et al (2009) Reappraisal of repeated transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:806–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V et al (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359:378–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruix J, Raoul JL, Sherman M et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial. J Hepatol 57:821–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathieu D, Grenier P, Larde D, Vasile N (1984) Portal vein involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: dynamic CT features. Radiology 152:127–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tublin ME, Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL (1997) Benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis: differentiation by CT characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:719–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Willatt JM, Hussain HK, Adusumilli S, Marrero JA (2008) MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: challenges and controversies. Radiology 247:311–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kothary N, Weintraub JL, Susman J, Rundback JH (2007) Transarterial chemoembolization for primary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients at high risk. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:1517–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi JW, Chung JW, Cho YK et al (2014) Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinomas with central bile duct invasion: safety, prognosis, and predictive factors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:937–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SH, Kim YJ, Lee JM et al (2007) Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography--comparison with endoscopy. Radiology 242:759–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim H, Choi D, Gwak GY et al (2009) Evaluation of esophageal varices on liver computed tomography: receiver operating characteristic analyses of the performance of radiologists and endoscopists. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1534–1540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30:52–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European association for the study of the liver. J Hepatol 35:421–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown DB, Nikolic B, Covey AM et al (2012) Quality improvement guidelines for transhepatic arterial chemoembolization, embolization, and chemotherapeutic infusion for hepatic malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:287–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Imai Y, Chikayama T, Nakazawa M et al (2011) Usefulness of miriplatin as an anticancer agent for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 47:179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vogl TJ, Lammer J, Lencioni R et al (2011) Liver, gastrointestinal, and cardiac toxicity in intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma treated with PRECISION TACE with drug-eluting beads: results from the PRECISION V randomized trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W562–W570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA (2003) Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S199–S202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH (2006) Clinical trials are often false positive: a review of simple methods to control this problem. Curr Clin Pharmacol 1:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Memon K, Kulik LM, Lewandowski RJ et al (2014) Comparative study of staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma in 428 patients treated with radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:1056–1066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kulik LM, Carr BI, Mulcahy MF et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of 90Y radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis. Hepatology 47:71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kokudo N, Hasegawa K, Akahane M et al (2015) Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Japan society of hepatology 2013 update (3rd JSH-HCC Guidelines). Hepatol Res 45

  32. Luo J, Guo RP, Lai EC et al (2011) Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:413–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marrero JA, Fontana RJ, Barrat A et al (2005) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort. Hepatology 41:707–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sahara S, Kawai N, Sato M et al (2012) Prospective evaluation of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with multiple anti-cancer drugs (epirubicin, cisplatin, mitomycin c, 5-fluorouracil) compared with TACE with epirubicin for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:1363–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marelli L, Stigliano R, Triantos C et al (2007) Transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: which technique is more effective? A systematic review of cohort and randomized studies. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:6–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang M, Lin Q, Wang H et al (2016) Survival benefit of chemoembolization plus Iodine125 seed implantation in unresectable hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT: a retrospective matched cohort study. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4198-x

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang YF, Guo RP, Zou RH et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of preoperative chemoembolization for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: a prospective comparative study. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4021-8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hyo-Cheol Kim. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Medical Research Collaborating Center of Seoul National University Hospital kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. No subjects or cohorts have been previously reported.

Methodology: retrospective, observational, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyo-Cheol Kim.

Additional information

This study has not been presented or accepted for presentation at any scientific meetings.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Suppl. Table 1

(DOCX 35.5 kb)

Suppl. Table 2

(DOCX 36 kb)

Supplementary figure 1

(JPEG 139 kb)

(TIFF 79 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J.W., Kim, HC., Lee, JH. et al. Transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with segmental portal vein tumour thrombus. Eur Radiol 27, 1448–1458 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4511-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4511-3

Keywords

Navigation