Total Pancreatectomy for Cancer of the Pancreas: Is It Appropriate?

Abstract. During the late 1960s total pancreatectomy was advocated on theoretic grounds as an operation superior to subtotal (Whipple) resection in patients with pancreatic cancer. There are, however, no prospective randomized studies and only few institutional comparisons between the two operations. The aim of the present paper was to report the clinical outcome of total and subtotal pancreatectomy, respectively, in a consecutive series of patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer. The short- and long-term results of 89 consecutive patients who underwent total pancreatectomy (1959–1984) for pancreatic cancer were retrospectively compared with a similar group of 36 patients who had a subtotal pancreatectomy (1985–1992) for the same diagnosis. The clinical characteristics were on the whole similar in the two groups. Postoperative mortality and morbidity, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time, reoperation rate, postoperative days in the intensive care unit, and duration of hospital stay were statistically significantly increased after total pancreatectomy. The 5-year survival rate was lower after total pancreatectomy when hospital deaths were included in the analysis. At multivariate analysis total pancreatectomy adversely influenced long-term survival compared to subtotal resection, as did positive lymph nodes and poor histologic differentiation. Better early and long-term results were found after subtotal than after total pancreatectomy in patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer. Although the two operations were done during different time periods, we believe the results suggest that total pancreatectomy cannot be recommended as a routine treatment for this patient group.