Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is Laparoscopic Gastrectomy More Advantageous for Elderly Patients Than for Young Patients with Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer?

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is now practiced widely, but it is unclear whether LG is the appropriate approach for elderly patients with resectable advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to examine whether LG is more or less advantageous for elderly patients than for young patients.

Methods

We collected data on 571 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for pT2–4 gastric cancer between January 2001 and December 2015. After adjustment with one-to-one propensity score matching, short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the LG and open gastrectomy (OG) groups among young (age < 70 years) and elderly (age ≥ 70 years) patients.

Results

The LG group had a significantly longer operative time (P < 0.001) and less blood loss (P < 0.001) than the OG group among young and elderly patients. There were no significant differences regarding complications. Although disease-specific survival was similar between the LG and OG groups among young and elderly patients, LG was associated with more favorable overall survival than OG only among elderly patients (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.35–1.26). Death from respiratory diseases occurred more frequently in the OG group (10.9%) than in the LG group (0%) for elderly patients (P = 0.012).

Conclusion

LG for resectable advanced gastric cancer was not inferior to OG in terms of both short-term and long-term outcomes regardless of patient age. In elderly patients, LG may improve overall survival by reducing mortality from respiratory diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Cancer Today: Population fact sheets. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2020

  2. Kurokawa Y, Doki Y, Mizusawa J et al (2018) Bursectomy versus omentectomy alone for resectable gastric cancer (JCOG1001): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:460–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saito T, Kurokawa Y, Miyazaki Y et al (2015) Which is a more reliable indicator of survival after gastric cancer surgery: Postoperative complication occurrence or C-reactive protein elevation? J Surg Oncol 112:894–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Partridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK (2012) Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing 41:142–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soreide K, Wijnhoven BP (2016) Surgery for an ageing population. Br J Surg 103:e7–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Result of the population estimates: monthly report; March 1, 2019 (final estimates). https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/jinsui/tsuki/index.html

  7. Endo S, Shimizu Y, Ikenaga M et al (2017) Survival benefit of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients ≥ 85 years old: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis. Surgery 161:984–994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kusano C, Iwasaki M, Kaltenbach T et al (2011) Should elderly patients undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer? Long-term comparative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1064–1069

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim JH, Lee DH, Shin CM et al (2014) Clinicopathological features and surgical safety of gastric cancer in elderly patients. J Korean Med Sci 29:1639–1645

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M et al (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiki N, Katai H, Mizusawa J et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703). Gastric Cancer 21:155–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Honda M, Hiki N, Kinoshita T et al (2016) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the LOC-1 study. Ann Surg 264:214–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H et al (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20:699–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H et al (2010) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer 13:238–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC et al (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 32:627–633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU et al (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263:28–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurokawa Y, Katai H, Fukuda H et al (2008) Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:501–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura K, Katai H, Mizusawa J et al (2013) A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912). Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:324–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y et al (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK et al (2016) Morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: short term outcomes from multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-02). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 34(suppl):4062 (abstr)

  21. Lee SW, Etoh T, Ohyama T et al (2017) Short-term outcomes from a multi-institutional, phase III study of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 35(suppl):4029 (abstr)

  22. Furukawa H, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S et al (2018) Short-term outcomes and nutritional status after laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with a very small remnant stomach for cStage I proximal gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 21:500–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M et al (2015) Laparoscopic intraoperative navigation surgery for gastric cancer using real-time rendered 3D CT images. Surg Today 45:618–624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M et al (2013) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study. World J Surg 37:2379–2386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2121-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Takiguchi S, Hiura Y, Takahashi T et al (2013) Preservation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve during laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: impact on postprandial changes in ghrelin secretion. World J Surg 37:2172–2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2078-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S et al (2014) Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:137–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takiguchi S, Sekimoto M, Miyake Y et al (2003) Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the hand-sewn Billroth-I anastomotic technique: report of a case. Surg Today 33:371–374

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takiguchi S, Sekimoto M, Fujiwara Y et al (2004) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with intraoperative navigation using three-dimensional angio computed tomography images reconstructed as laparoscopic view. Surg Endosc 18:106–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2014) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241:232–237

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim MG, Yook JH, Kim KC et al (2011) Influence of obesity on early surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:151–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee SI, Choi YS, Park DJ et al (2006) Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. J Am College Surg 202:874–880

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Noguchi K et al (2010) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14:958–964

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M et al (2019) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study in Japan (LOC-A Study). Ann Surg 269:887–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Z, Li B, Bai B et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Oncol 27:441–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu Y, Hua J, Li J et al (2019) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large cohort study. Am J Surg 217:750–756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y et al (2019) Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321:1983–1992

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health and aging: trends in aging–United States and worldwide. JAMA 289:1371–1373

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mikami J, Kurokawa Y, Miyazaki Y et al (2015) Postoperative gastrectomy outcomes in octogenarians with gastric cancer. Surg Today 45:1134–1138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yamada H, Shinohara T, Takeshita M et al (2013) Postoperative complications in the oldest old gastric cancer patients. Int J Surg 11:467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Takeuchi D, Koide N, Suzuki A et al (2015) Postoperative complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Res 198:317–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hashimoto T, Kurokawa Y, Mikami J et al (2019) Postoperative long-term outcomes in elderly patients with gastric cancer and risk factors for death from other diseases. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05109-5(in press)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kiuchi J, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D et al (2016) Putative risk factors for postoperative pneumonia which affects poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 21:920–926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ethun CG, Bilen MA, Jani AB et al (2017) Frailty and cancer: Implications for oncology surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 67:362–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA et al (2013) Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:392–397

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 357:1810–1820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors had no financial support for the research reported.

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

    Yuki Ushimaru, Yukinori Kurokawa, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Takuro Saito, Kotaro Yamashita, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Makoto Yamasaki, Kiyokazu Nakajima & Yuichiro Doki

  2. Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan

    Masaki Mori

Authors
  1. Yuki Ushimaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yukinori Kurokawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tsuyoshi Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takuro Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kotaro Yamashita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Koji Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tomoki Makino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Makoto Yamasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kiyokazu Nakajima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Masaki Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yuichiro Doki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukinori Kurokawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest regarding the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ushimaru, Y., Kurokawa, Y., Takahashi, T. et al. Is Laparoscopic Gastrectomy More Advantageous for Elderly Patients Than for Young Patients with Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer?. World J Surg 44, 2332–2339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05486-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05486-2

Search

Navigation