Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Versus Other Prognostic Markers for Predicting Gastric Cancer Recurrence

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hypercoagulation is associated with tumor progression and metastasis in various types of malignancy. We compared the prognostic value of preoperative plasma fibrinogen level with those of other prognostic markers in patients with gastric cancer and assessed whether fibrinogen level was an independent prognostic indicator.

Methods

We collected preoperative data from 609 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy. A receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and fibrinogen level in predicting recurrence. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the normal and high fibrinogen groups.

Results

In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.534 for CEA, 0.552 for CA19-9, 0.587 for CRP, 0.565 for platelet count, 0.567 for PLR, 0.522 for NLR, and 0.692 for fibrinogen. Plasma fibrinogen level increased with tumor stage. The high fibrinogen (≥350 mg/dl) group had significantly worse RFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) than the normal fibrinogen (<350 mg/dl) group. Cox multivariate analysis of RFS revealed that fibrinogen level was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.001) in addition to sex, pT stage, and pN stage.

Conclusions

Preoperative plasma fibrinogen level had the highest predictive value for recurrence among seven known prognostic markers. Since fibrinogen level is an independent factor for RFS, it would be useful for predicting prognosis after gastric cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shinohara S, Korenaga D, Edagawa A et al (2013) Significant prognostic factors in patients with Stage IV gastric cancer with special reference to the curability of surgery. Surg Today 43(1):40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshikawa T, Rino Y, Yukawa N et al (2014) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan: a standing position by comparing with adjuvant chemotherapy. Surg Today 44(1):11–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kochi M, Fujii M, Kanamori N et al (2000) Evaluation of serum CEA and CA19-9 levels as prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 3(4):177–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang ZB, Zhou X, Xu J et al (2014) Prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in gastric cancer. World J Clin Oncol 5(2):170–176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim DK, Oh SY, Kwon HC et al (2009) Clinical significances of preoperative serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein level in operable gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 9:155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikeda M, Furukawa H, Imamura H et al (2002) Poor prognosis associated with thrombocytosis in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9(3):287–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou X, Du Y, Huang Z et al (2014) Prognostic value of PLR in various cancers: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(6):e101119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shimada H, Takiguchi N, Kainuma O et al (2010) High preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 13(3):170–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trousseau A (1965) Phlegmasia alba dolens. In: Clinique Medicale de L’Hotel Dieu de Paris, 2nd edition. Balliere, p 654–656

  11. Di Micco P, Romano M, Niglio A et al (2001) Alteration of haemostasis in non-metastatic gastric cancer. Dig Liver Dis 33(7):546–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita H, Kitayama J, Nagawa H (2005) Hyperfibrinogenemia is a useful predictor for lymphatic metastasis in human gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35(10):595–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamashita H, Kitayama J, Kanno N et al (2006) Hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with lymphatic as well as hematogenous metastasis and worse clinical outcome in T2 gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 6:147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sano T, Aiko T (2011) New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer 14(2):97–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuchi H, Ikeuchi S, Kitagawa Y et al (2007) Pretreatment plasma fibrinogen level correlates with tumor progression and metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(12):2222–2227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dvorak HF (1987) Thrombosis and cancer. Hum Pathol 18(3):275–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Modrau II, Iversen LL, Thoriacius-Ussing OO (2001) Hemostatic alterations in patients with benign and malignant colorectal disease during major abdominal surgery. Thromb Res 104(5):309–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett JS, Hoxie JA, Leitman SF et al (1983) Inhibition of fibrinogen binding to stimulated human platelets by a monoclonal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80(9):2417–2421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Honn KV, Tang DG, Crissman JD (1992) Platelets and cancer metastasis: a causal relationship? Cancer Metastasis Rev 11(3–4):325–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Languino LR, Plescia J, Duperray A et al (1993) Fibrinogen mediates leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium through an ICAM-I -dependent pathway. Cell 73(7):1423–1434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Biggerstaff JP, Seth N, Amirkhosravi A et al (1999) Soluble fibrin augments platelet/tumor cell adherence in vitro and in vivo, and enhances experimental metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 17(8):723–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW et al (2012) Preoperative plasma fibrinogen level is a useful predictor of adjacent organ involvement in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 12(2):81–87

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagy JA, Meyers MS, Msse EM et al (1995) Pathogenesis of ascites tumor growth: fibrinogen influx and fibrin accumulation in tissues lining the peritoneal cavity. Cancer Res 55(2):369–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma Y, Qian Y, Lv W (2007) The correlation between plasma fibrinogen levels and the clinical features of patients with ovarian carcinoma. J Int Med Res 35(5):678–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors had no financial support for the research reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukinori Kurokawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest regarding the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, M., Kurokawa, Y., Miyazaki, Y. et al. Usefulness of Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Versus Other Prognostic Markers for Predicting Gastric Cancer Recurrence. World J Surg 40, 1904–1909 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3474-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3474-5

Keywords

Navigation