Skip to main content
Log in

Sutured Repair of Primary Small Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias: Concomitant Rectus Diastasis Is a Significant Risk Factor for Recurrence

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Umbilical and epigastric hernias are common in the adult population and prompt repair is advised. We aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant rectus diastasis on the outcome of patients who underwent primary sutured fascia closure of a hernia without mesh.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 231 consecutive adult patients who had undergone elective suture-based repair of small (<2 cm) and primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with respect to complications, recurrence, and chronic pain.

Results

Patients with rectus diastasis suffered from a significantly increased rate of hernia recurrence (29/93 vs. 9/108; p < 0.001). The use of absorbable sutures also had a negative influence on the recurrence rate (26/90 vs. 12/111; p = 0.001). Obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2) was associated with more complications (p = 0.02). Wound infections following hernia repair also were associated with a higher rate of recurrence (p = 0.08) and chronic pain (p = 0.02). The mean follow-up via a structured questionnaire was 31 months (range 3–59) and data were available for 201 of 231 patients (87 %).

Conclusion

We strongly recommend preoperatively checking for rectus diastasis and using nonabsorbable sutures as an alternative to mesh repair only when repairing small umbilical or epigastric hernias (<2 cm) and there is no concomitant rectus diastasis. Patients with coexistent rectus diastasis definitely benefit from mesh-based repair of the midline to decrease the recurrence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackson OJ, Moglen LH (1970) Umbilical hernia. A retrospective study. Calif Med 113(4):8–11

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hjaltason E (1981) Incarcerated hernia. Acta Chir Scand 147(4):263–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arroyo Al, García P, Pérez F et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J et al (2013) Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg 37(11):2548–2552. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Venclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M (2008) Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas) 44(11):855–859

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schumacher OP, Peiper C, Lörken M et al (2003) Long-term results after Spitzy’s umbilical hernia repair. Chirurg 74(1):50–54 [in German]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Muysoms FE, Bontinck J, Pletinckx (2011) Complications of mesh devices for intraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a word of caution. Hernia 15(4):463–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ponten JE, Leenders BJ, Charbon JA et al (2014) Mesh Or Patch for Hernia on Epigastric and Umbilical Sites (MORPHEUS trial): study protocol for a multi-centre patient blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg 14(1):33

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hickey F, Finch JG, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review on the outcomes of correction of diastasis of the recti. Hernia 15(6):607–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalenbäck J, Andersson C, Ribokas D et al (2013) Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs. Hernia 17(4):493–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fachinelli A, Maciel Trindade MR (2007) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of total and types I and III collagens in patients with ventral hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392(4):459–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC et al (1997) Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 21(1):62–65. doi:10.1007/s002689900194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Westen ML, Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN et al (2014) Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(1):65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the study nurses who helped in data acquisition and data management. The kind statistical support of Mag. Michael Stumpner is greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of interest

Gernot Köhler has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gernot Köhler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köhler, G., Luketina, RR. & Emmanuel, K. Sutured Repair of Primary Small Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias: Concomitant Rectus Diastasis Is a Significant Risk Factor for Recurrence. World J Surg 39, 121–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2765-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2765-y

Keywords

Navigation