Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lower Reoperation Rate for Recurrence after Mesh versus Sutured Elective Repair in Small Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias. A Nationwide Register Study

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Repair for a small (≤2 cm) umbilical and epigastric hernia is a minor surgical procedure. The most common surgical repair techniques are a sutured repair or a repair with mesh reinforcement. However, the optimal repair technique with regard to risk of reoperation for recurrence is not well documented. The aim of the present study was in a nationwide setup to investigate the reoperation rate for recurrence after small open umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs using either sutured or mesh repair.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective cohort study based on intraoperative registrations from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database (DVHD) of patients undergoing elective open mesh and sutured repair for small (≤2 cm) umbilical and epigastric hernias. Patients were included during a 4-year study period. A complete follow-up was obtained by combining intraoperative data from the DVHD with data from the Danish National Patient Register. The cumulative reoperation rates were obtained using cumulative incidence plot and compared with the log rank test.

Results and conclusions

In total, 4,786 small (≤2 cm) elective open umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs were included. Age was median 48 years (range 18–95 years). Follow-up was 21 months (range 0–47 months). The cumulated reoperation rates for recurrence were 2.2 % for mesh reinforcement and 5.6 % for sutured repair (P = 0.001). The overall cumulated reoperation rate for sutured and mesh repairs was 4.8 %. In conclusion, reoperation rate for recurrence for small umbilical and epigastric hernias was significantly lower after mesh repair compared with sutured repair. Mesh reinforcement should be routine in even small umbilical or epigastric hernias to lower the risk of reoperation for recurrence avoid recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2010) Establishment and initial experiences from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database. Hernia 14:131–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Jørgensen LN et al (2010) Surgical treatment of ventral hernia. Ugeskr Laeger 172:1987–1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Witherspoon P, O’Dwyer PJ (2009) Surgeons’ perspectives on options for ventral abdominal hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire. Hernia 9:259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H et al (2012) Reoperation for recurrence vs. clinical recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 256:955–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G et al (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190:61–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arroyo A, Pérez F, Serrano P et al (2002) Is prosthetic umbilical hernia repair bound to replace primary herniorrhaphy in the adult patient? Hernia 6:175–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asolati M, Huerta S, Sarosi G et al (2006) Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience. Am J Surg 192:627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrow B, Awad S, Berger DH et al (2008) More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center. Am J Surg 196:647–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright BE, Beckerman J, Cohen M et al (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184:505–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanjay P, Ried TD, Davies EL et al (2005) Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia 9:248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF et al (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9:334–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offers an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14:455–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Erritzøe-Jervild L, Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F et al (2013) Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias. Hernia 17:211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M et al (2011) A nationwide study on readmission, morbidity, and mortality after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Hernia 15:541–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Helgstrand F, Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J et al. (2013) Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1120-9.

  17. Langer C, Schaper A, Liersch T et al (2005) Prognosis factors in incisional hernia surgery: 25 years of experience. Hernia 9:16–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bencini L, Sanchez LJ, Bernini M et al (2009) Predictors of recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:128–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark

    M. W. Christoffersen & T. Bisgaard

  2. Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark

    J. Rosenberg

  3. Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    F. Helgstrand & H. Kehlet

  4. Department of Surgery, Køge Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Køge, Denmark

    T. Bisgaard

Authors
  1. M. W. Christoffersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Helgstrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Kehlet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Bisgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. Christoffersen.

Additional information

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Reg. No. 2008-58-0020). Clinicaltrials.gov. ID: NCT01607801.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christoffersen, M.W., Helgstrand, F., Rosenberg, J. et al. Lower Reoperation Rate for Recurrence after Mesh versus Sutured Elective Repair in Small Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias. A Nationwide Register Study. World J Surg 37, 2548–2552 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation