Skip to main content
Log in

Preservation Versus Division of Ilioinguinal Nerve on Open Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair, a serious problem, is caused by entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve either by mesh or development of fibrosis. Division of the ilioinguinal nerve during hernioplasty has been found to reduce the incidence of chronic groin pain. However, the traditional approach favors preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open hernia repair.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of preservation versus division of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. The primary outcome was the incidence of groin pain; secondary outcomes were numbness and sensory loss.

Results

We reviewed six trials with 1,286 patients. We found no difference between the groups for the incidence of groin pain or numbness at 1, 6, and 12 months after open mesh inguinal repair. The incidence of sensory loss or change was significantly higher in the division group than in the preservation group at 6 months [risk ratio (RR) 1.25; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.53] and at 12 months (RR 1.55; 95 % CI 1.01–2.37) postoperatively. No significant differences between the groups were noted at any other points in time.

Conclusions

Preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is associated with a decreased incidence of sensory loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with that of the division technique. No significant differences were found between the groups for chronic groin pain or numbness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC et al (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H et al (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM et al (2006) Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 244:27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Surgical management of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:795–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alfieri S, Rotondi F, Di Giorgio A et al (2006) Influence of preservation versus division of ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genital nerves during open mesh herniorrhaphy: prospective multicentric study of chronic pain. Ann Surg 243:553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diitrik GW, Ridl K, Kuhn JA et al (2004) Routine ilioinguinal nerve excision in inguinal hernia repairs. Am J Surg 188:736–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smeds S, Löfström L, Eriksson O (2010) Influence of nerve identification and the resection of nerves ‘at risk’ on postoperative pain in open inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 14:265–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsakayannis DE, Kiriakopoulos AC, Linos DA (2004) Elective neurectomy during open, “tension free” inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 8:67–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravichandran D, Kalambe BG, Pain JA (2000) Pilot randomized controlled study of preservation or division of ilioinguinal nerve in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 87:1166–1167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malekpour F, Mirhasgemi SH, Hajinasrolah MD et al (2008) Ilioinguinal nerve excision in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: results of randomized clinical trial—simple solution for difficult problem. Am J Surg 195:735–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johner A, Faulds J, Wiseman SM (2011) Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surgery 150:534–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crea N, Pata G (2010) Effects of prophylactic ilioinguinal nerve excision in mesh groin hernia repair: short- and long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Am Surg 76:1275–1281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karakayali F, Oksuz E, Turk E et al (2010) Effectiveness if multiple neurectomies to prevent chronic groin pain after tension-free hernia repair. Int Surg 95:40–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–e34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S et al (2000) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. Br J Surg 87:1448–1454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U et al (2004) Randomized controlled trial of preservation or elective division of ilioinguinal nerve on open inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg 139:755–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trabucco EE (1993) The office hernioplasty and the Trabucco repair. Ann Ital Chir 64:127–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wanz GE (1984) Complications of inguinal hernial repair. Surg Clin N Am 64:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amid PK, Hiatt JR (2007) New understanding of the causes and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy inguinodynia and orchialgia. J Am Coll Surg 205:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Starling JR, Harms BA (1989) Diagnosis and treatment of genitofemoral and ilioinguinal neuralgia. World J Surg 13:586–591. doi:10.1007/BF01658875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vuilleumier H, Hübner M, Demartines N (2009) Neuropathy after herniorrhaphy: indication for surgical treatment and outcome. World J Surg 33:841–845. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9869-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK et al (1988) Cause and prevention of postherniorrhaphy neuralgia: a proposed protocol for treatment. Am J Surg 155:786–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Amid PK (2004) Causes, prevention, and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy neuropathic inguinodynia: triple neurectomy with proximal end implantation. Hernia 8:343–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors (Wayne Hsu, Ching-Shyang Chen, Hung-Chia Lee, Hung-Hua Liang, Li-Jen Kuo, Po-Li Wei, and Ka-Wai Tam) have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ka-Wai Tam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, W., Chen, CS., Lee, HC. et al. Preservation Versus Division of Ilioinguinal Nerve on Open Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World J Surg 36, 2311–2319 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1657-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1657-2

Keywords

Navigation