Skip to main content
Log in

Options in Breast Cancer Local Therapy: Who Gets What?

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, women with primary breast cancer may consider three surgical options: breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy (MT), and mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (MT + CPM). In each case, the ipsilateral axilla is generally managed with a sentinel node biopsy and possibly an axillary lymph node dissection. BCS generally requires breast radiotherapy, except in older women having tumors with a favorable prognosis who will receive endocrine therapy. In contrast, women treated with MT generally do not require radiotherapy, except for those with large tumors or metastases to the axillary nodes. Moreover, MT and MT + CPM are usually undertaken with breast reconstruction. Yet, most patients today are suitable candidates for BCS, with a few relative contraindications. Thus, early pregnancy, previous radiotherapy to the breasts, active collagen vascular disease, multicentric breast cancer, large tumors (although neoadjuvant systemic therapy can often reduce tumor size), and the presence of the BRCA mutation are all relative contraindications to BCS. BRCA mutation carriers should consider MT + CPM because their risk of contralateral breast cancer is greatly increased. In the U.S., the use of MT for the treatment of primary breast cancer has declined in recent years, while MT + CPM rates have increased, and BCS rates have remained relatively stable. The underlying reasons for these trends are not fully understood. Local therapy options should be discussed with each patient in considerable detail, and more studies are needed to better elucidate which factors influence a woman’s choice of local therapy following a breast cancer diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jatoi I (1999) The natural history of breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 79:949–960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Halsted WS (1894) I. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg 20:497–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Patey DH, Dyson WH (1948) The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to the type of operation performed. Br J Cancer 2:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jatoi I (2011) The impact of advances in treatment on the efficacy of mammography screening. Prev Med 53:103–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McWhirter R (1955) Simple mastectomy and radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Radiol 28:128–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER et al (1985) Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med 312:674–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cancer Research Campaign Working Party (1980) Cancer research campaign (King’s/Cambridge) trial for early breast cancer. A detailed update at the tenth year. Lancet 2:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arriagada R, Lê MG, Rochard F, Contesso G (1996) Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 14:1558–1564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC et al (2003) Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer 98:697–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS et al (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1143–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA et al (1992) Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 11:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen M, During M et al (2008) Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol. Acta Oncol 47:672–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jatoi I, Proschan MA (2005) Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol 28:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinh-Hung V, Verschraegen C (2004) Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy: pooled-analysis for risks of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S et al (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Darby S, McGale P, Correa C et al (2011) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 378:1707–1716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Berry D et al (2004) Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:971–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ et al (2005) Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:116–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J et al (1999) Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet 353:1641–1648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J (2007) Is the benefit of postmastectomy irradiation limited to patients with four or more positive nodes, as recommended in international consensus reports? A subgroup analysis of the DBCG 82 b&c randomized trials. Radiother Oncol 82:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Overgaard M (1999) Overview of randomized trials in high risk breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy with or without postmastectomy irradiation. Semin Radiat Oncol 9:292–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benson JR, Jatoi I, Keisch M, Esteva FJ, Makris A, Jordan VC (2009) Early breast cancer. Lancet 373:1463–1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Borger J, Kemperman H, Hart A, Peterse H, van Dongen J, Bartelink H (1994) Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol 12:653–660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists (1998) Mastectomy or lumpectomy? The choice of operation for clinical stages I and II breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. CMAJ 158(Suppl 3):S15–S21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin A, Abu-Isa E, Griffith KA, Ben-Josef E (2008) Toxicity of radiotherapy in patients with collagen vascular disease. Cancer 113:648–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Veronesi U, Bonadonna G, Zurrida S et al (1995) Conservation surgery after primary chemotherapy in large carcinomas of the breast. Ann Surg 222:612–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Garcia-Etienne CA, Barile M, Gentilini OD et al (2009) Breast-conserving surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: are we approaching an answer? Ann Surg Oncol 16:3380–3387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pierce LJ, Strawderman M, Narod SA et al (2000) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18:3360–3369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Metcalfe KA, Lubinski J, Ghadirian P et al (2008) Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. J Clin Oncol 26:1093–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW (1991) Prognosis in T2N0M0 stage I breast carcinoma: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 9:1650–1661

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pierce LJ, Levin AM, Rebbeck TR et al (2006) Ten-year multi-institutional results of breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in BRCA1/2-associated stage I/II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2437–2443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jatoi I, Benson JR, Liau SS et al (2010) The role of surgery in cancer prevention. Curr Probl Surg 47:750–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, Virnig BA, Al-Refaie WB, Tuttle TM (2010) Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol 28:3437–3441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Jatoi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jatoi, I. Options in Breast Cancer Local Therapy: Who Gets What?. World J Surg 36, 1498–1502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1530-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1530-3

Keywords

Navigation