Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Esophageal Carcinoma: Prognostic Differences between Squamous Cell Carcinoma And Adenocarcinoma

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the esophagus differ in their natural history and treatment outcome remains controversial. The aim of the study was to identify the similarities and differences between SCC and ADC in terms of their clinical and histologic presentations and the oncologic results. Curative esophagectomy was attempted in 742 consecutive patients between January 1982 and January 2002. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was proposed for patients with locally advanced tumors. Demographic parameters, histomorphologic tumor characteristics, treatment strategies, postoperative mortality and morbidity rates, recurrence, and long-term prognosis were recorded retrospectively.

The SCC and ADC groups were composed of 624 and 118 patients, respectively. ADC occurrence increased significantly during the study period. Compared to the SCC group, patients in the ADC group were significantly older and had a lower incidence of respiratory and otolaryngologic histories; they also had more advanced tumors and a higher percentage of invaded lymph nodes, shorter time until resumption of feeding, shorter hospital stay, a higher diffuse recurrence rate, and a lower incidence of tobacco-related second primary tumors. Five-year survival rates after R0 resection were 46% and 45% in the SCC and ADC groups, respectively (p = 0.804). There was a significant survival advantage for ADC patients with pT1, pN0, or stage I tumors (p < 0.050) and different independent prognostic factors than those with SCCs. In conclusion, the clinical, histologic, and oncologic differences between SCC and ADC justify a differentiated therapeutic concept for these two tumor entities and distinct consideration in clinical reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WJ Blot SS Devesa RW Kneller et al. (l991) ArticleTitleRising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia J.A.M.A. 265 1287–1289

    Google Scholar 

  2. SS Devesa WJ Blot JF Fraumeni SuffixJr. (1998) ArticleTitleChanging patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States Cancer 83 2049–2053 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2049::AID-CNCR1>3.3.CO;2-U Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FktlCjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9827707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. T Lerut P Leyn ParticleDe W Coosemans et al. (1992) ArticleTitleSurgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy Ann. Surg. 216 583–590

    Google Scholar 

  4. JM Muller H Erasmi M Stelzner et al. (1990) ArticleTitleSurgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma Br. J. Surg. 77 845–857 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BA28nosF0%3D Occurrence Handle2203505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JA Hagen JH Peters TR DeMeester (1993) ArticleTitleSuperiority of extended en bloc esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the lower esophagus and cardia J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 106 850–858

    Google Scholar 

  6. E Bollschweiler W Schroder AH Holscher et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePreoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus Br. J. Surg. 87 1106–1110

    Google Scholar 

  7. DJ Mathisen HC Grillo EW Wilkins SuffixJr et al. (1988) ArticleTitleTransthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus Ann. Thorac. Surg. 45 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  8. O Lund JM Hasenkam MT Aagaard et al. (1989) ArticleTitleTime-related changes in characteristics of prognostic significance in carcinomas of the oesophagus and cardia Br. J. Surg. 76 1301–1307

    Google Scholar 

  9. JL Griffith JT Davis (1980) ArticleTitleA twenty-year experience with surgical management of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 79 447–452

    Google Scholar 

  10. HR Matthews A Steel (1987) ArticleTitleLeft-sided subtotal oesophagectomy for carcinoma Br. J. Surg. 74 1115–1117

    Google Scholar 

  11. MD Lieberman CD Shriver S Bleckner et al. (1995) ArticleTitleCarcinoma of the esophagus: prognostic significance of histologic type J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 109 130–138

    Google Scholar 

  12. DB Skinner KD Dowlatshahi TR DeMeester (1982) ArticleTitlePotentially curable cancer of the esophagus Cancer 50 2571–2575

    Google Scholar 

  13. R Giuli M Gignoux (1980) ArticleTitleTreatment of carcinoma of the esophagus: retrospective study of 2,400 patients Ann. Surg 192 44–52

    Google Scholar 

  14. AH Holscher E Bollschweiler PM Schneider et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePrognosis of early esophageal cancer: comparison between adeno-and squamous cell carcinoma Cancer 76 178–186

    Google Scholar 

  15. JR Siewert HJ Stein M Feith et al. (2001) ArticleTitleHistologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western word Ann. Surg 234 360–367 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200109000-00010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvotVylsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11524589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Research Society for Esophageal Diseases. (1976) ArticleTitleGuidelines for the clinical and pathologic studies for carcinoma of the esophagus Jpn. J. Surg. 6 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  17. LH Sobon C Wittekind (Eds) (1997) UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors EditionNumber5 Wiley-Liss New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. P Hermanek (1995) ArticleTitlepTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance World J. Surg. 19 184–190

    Google Scholar 

  19. SG Swisher L Deford KW Merriman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 119 1126–1132

    Google Scholar 

  20. JM Daly WA Fry AG Little et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEsophageal cancer: results of an American College of Surgeons patient care evaluation study J. Am. Coll. Surg. 190 562–572

    Google Scholar 

  21. FH Ellis SuffixJr SP Gibb E Watkins SuffixJr. (1983) ArticleTitleEsophagogastrectomy; a safe, widely applicable, and expeditious form of palliation for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia Ann. Surg 198 531–540

    Google Scholar 

  22. A Alexandrou PA Davis S Law et al. (2002) ArticleTitleSquamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus and gastric cardia: similarities and differences Dis. Esophagus 15 290–295

    Google Scholar 

  23. AH Holscher E Bollschweiler W Schroder et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePrognostic differences between early squamous-cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus Dis. Esophagus 10 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  24. SG Urba MB Orringer C Perez-Tamayo et al. (1992) ArticleTitleConcurrent preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in localized esophageal adenocarcinoma Cancer 69 285–291

    Google Scholar 

  25. RW Carey AD Hilgenberg EW Wilkins SuffixJr et al. (1993) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with surgical resection and possible postoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus Cancer Invest. 11 99–105

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Generale, Hopital Claude Huriez-CHRU, Place de Verdun, 59037, Cedex, Lille, France

    Christophe Mariette M.D.Ph.D., Laetitia Finzi M.D., Guillaume Piessen M.D. & Jean Pierre Triboulet M.D.

  2. Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire, Unite INSERM 560, Place de Verdun, 59037, Cedex, Lille, France

    Christophe Mariette M.D.Ph.D. & Isabelle Van Seuningen Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Christophe Mariette M.D.Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laetitia Finzi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guillaume Piessen M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Isabelle Van Seuningen Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jean Pierre Triboulet M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Mariette M.D.Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mariette, C., Finzi, L., Piessen, G. et al. Esophageal Carcinoma: Prognostic Differences between Squamous Cell Carcinoma And Adenocarcinoma. World J. Surg. 29, 39–45 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7542-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7542-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation