Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Contribution of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents to Nutrient Dynamics in Aquatic Systems: A Review

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excessive nutrient loading (considering nitrogen and phosphorus) is a major ongoing threat to water quality and here we review the impact of nutrient discharges from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to United States (U.S.) freshwater systems. While urban and agricultural land uses are significant nonpoint nutrient contributors, effluent from point sources such as WWTPs can overwhelm receiving waters, effectively dominating hydrological characteristics and regulating instream nutrient processes. Population growth, increased wastewater volumes, and sustainability of critical water resources have all been key factors influencing the extent of wastewater treatment. Reducing nutrient concentrations in wastewater is an important aspect of water quality management because excessive nutrient concentrations often prevent water bodies from meeting designated uses. WWTPs employ numerous physical, chemical, and biological methods to improve effluent water quality but nutrient removal requires advanced treatment and infrastructure that may be economically prohibitive. Therefore, effluent nutrient concentrations vary depending on the particular processes used to treat influent wastewater. Increasingly stringent regulations regarding nutrient concentrations in discharged effluent, along with greater freshwater demand in populous areas, have led to the development of extensive water recycling programs within many U.S. regions. Reuse programs provide an opportunity to reduce or eliminate direct nutrient discharges to receiving waters while allowing for the beneficial use of reclaimed water. However, nutrients in reclaimed water can still be a concern for reuse applications, such as agricultural and landscape irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahearn DS, Sheibley RW, Dahlgren RA, Anderson M, Johnson J, Tate KW (2005) Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last free-flowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. Journal of Hydrology 312:234–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD (1995) Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen CB, Lewis GP, Sargent KA, Sarkar D (2004) Influence of wastewater-treatment effluent on concentrations and fluxes of solutes in the Bush River, South Carolina, during extreme drought conditions. Environmental Geosciences 11:28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen DC, Sartoris JJ, Thullen JS, Reusch PG (2003) The effects of bird use on nutrient removal in a constructed wastewater-treatment wetland. Wetlands 23:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano T, Burton FL, Leverenz HL, Tsuchihashi R, Tchobanoglous G (2007) Water reuse: issues, technologies, and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano T, Cotruvo JA (2004) Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations. Water Research 38:1941–1951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asano T, Levine AD (1996) Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: past, present, and future. Water Science & Technology 33:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard JL (1974) Cut P and N without chemicals. Water and Wastes Engineering 11:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard JL (1984) Activated primary tanks for phosphate removal. Water SA 10:121–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baveye P, Vandevivere P, Hoyle BL, DeLeo PC, Sanchez de Lozada D (1998) Environmental impact and mechanisms of the biological clogging of saturated soils and aquifer materials. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 28:123–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Caraco NF (2001) Human impact on erodable phosphorus and eutrophication: a global perspective. Bioscience 51:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothwell ML (1985) Phosphorus limitation of lotic periphyton growth rates: an intersite comparison using continuous-flow troughs (Thompson River system, British Columbia). Limnology and Oceanography 30:527–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughton WH, Gottfried RJ, Sinclair NA, Yall I (1971) Metabolic factors affecting enhanced phosphorus uptake by activated sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 22:571–577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker RPG, Stensel HD (1990) Phosphorus removal from wastewater. Noyes Data Corporation, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian SJ, Nix SJ, Pitt RE, Durrans SR (2000) Urban wastewater management in the United States: past, present, and future. Journal of Urban Technology 7:33–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder JM, Noga EJ, Hobbs CW, Glasgow HB, Smith SA (1992) New “phantom” dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills. Nature 358:407–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • California State Water Resources Control Board (2002) Statewide recycled water survey. Office of Water Recycling, Sacramento, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey RO, Vellidis G, Lowrance R, Pringle CM (2007) Do nutrients limit algal periphyton in small blackwater coastal plain streams? Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:1183–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter V, Rybicki N (1986) Resurgence of submersed aquatic macrophytes in the tidal Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Estuaries 9:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll DL (1998) The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:261–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford CG, Wangsness DJ (1991) Effects of advanced wastewater treatment on the quality of White River, Indiana. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 27:769–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies FS, Maurer MA (1993) Reclaimed wastewater for irrigation of citrus in Florida. HortTechnology 3:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Day AD, Rahman A, Katterman FRH, Jensen V (1974) Effects of treated municipal wastewater and commercial fertilizer on growth, fiber, acid-soluble nucleotides, protein, and amino acid content in wheat hay. Journal of Environmental Quality 3:17–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Westphal A, Pratt R, Hyfield E, Rybczyk J, Paul Kemp G, Day JN, Marx B (2006) Effects of long-term municipal effluent discharge on the nutrient dynamics, productivity, and benthic community structure of a tidal freshwater forested wetland in Louisiana. Ecological Engineering 27:242–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deason JP, Schad TM, Sherk GW (2001) Water policy in the United States: a perspective. Water Policy 3:175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennehy KF, Litke DW, Tate CM, Qi SL, McMahon PB, Bruce BW, Kimbrough RA, Heiny JS (1998) Water quality in the South Platte River basin, Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming, 1992–95. USGS Circular 1167

  • DePinto JV, Young TC, Martin SC (1981) Algal-available phosphorus in suspended sediments from lower Great Lakes tributaries. Journal of Great Lakes Research 7:311–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Welch EB (2000) Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorich RA, Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1985) Estimating algal available phosphorus in suspended sediments by chemical extraction. Journal of Environmental Quality 14:400–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer SD, Wang X (2002) A comparison of stream biological responses to discharge from wastewater treatment plants in high and low population density areas. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:1065–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers E, Dirkzwager AH, van der Honing H (1991) Full-scale experiences with phosphate crystallization in a crystalactor. Water Science & Technology 23:819–824

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekka SA, Haggard BE, Matlock MD, Chaubey I (2006) Dissolved phosphorus concentrations and sediment interactions in effluent-dominated Ozark streams. Ecological Engineering 26:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follett RF (2001) Nitrogen transformation and transport processes. In: Follett RF, Hatfield JL (eds) Nitrogen in the Environment: Sources, Problemsand Management. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 17–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman A (1990) Water pollution policy. In: Portney PR (ed) Public policies for environmental protection. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Froelich PN (1988) Kinetic control of dissolved phosphate in natural rivers and estuaries: a primer on the phosphate buffer mechanism. Limnology and Oceanography 33:649–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fryar AE, Macko SA, Mullican WF, Romanak KD, Bennett PC (2000) Nitrate reduction during ground-water recharge, southern High Plains, Texas. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 40:335–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhs GW, Chen M (1975) Microbiological basis of phosphate removal in the activated sludge process for the treatment of wastewater. Microbial Ecology 2:119–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gayle BP, Boardman GD, Sherrard JH, Benoit RE (1989) Biological denitrification of water. Journal of Environmental Engineering 115:930–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber A, Winter CT (1985) Influence of extended anaerobic retention time on the performance of phoredox nutrient removal plants. Water Science & Technology 17:81–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CA, Meyer JL (2007) Nutrient uptake in a large urban river. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:576–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hager SW, Schemel LE (1992) Sources of nitrogen and phosphorus to northern San Francisco Bay. Estuaries 15:40–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard BE, Stanley EH, Storm DE (2005) Nutrient retention in a point-source-enriched stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard BE, Storm DE, Stanley EH (2001) Effect of a point source input on stream nutrient retention. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1291–1301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanke SH, Wentworth RW (1981) On the marginal cost of wastewater services. Land Economics 57:558–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecky RE, Kilham P (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnology and Oceanography 33:796–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horne AJ, Goldman CR (1994) Limnology. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner R, Welch E, Veenstra R (1983) Development of nuisance periphytic algae in laboratory streams in relation to enrichment and velocity. In: Wetzel R (ed) Periphyton of freshwater ecosystems. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Hue NV (1991) Effects of organic acids/anions on P sorption and phytoavailability in soils with different mineralogies. Soil Science 152:463–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes H (1969) The enrichment of streams. Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA, pp 188–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Ice G (2004) History of innovative best management practice development and its role in addressing water quality limited waterbodies. Journal of Environmental Engineering 130:684–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecological Applications 11:1027–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Dudley DR (1981) Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz RL (1991) Temporal relation between soluble reactive phosphorus and factors in stream water and sediments in Hoxie Gorge Creek, New York. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:84–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Clarke RA, Bastian RK (2001) Surface flow (SF) treatment wetlands as a habitat for wildlife and humans. Water Science & Technology 44:27–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knopman DS, Smith RA (1993) 20 years of the Clean Water Act: has U.S. water quality improved? Environment 35:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton MF, Cuvellier C, Jones JR (2002) Initial performance of a high capacity surface-flow treatment wetland. Wetlands 22:522–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko J, Day JW, Lane RR, Day JN (2004) A comparative evaluation of money-based and energy-based cost-benefit analyses of tertiary municipal wastewater treatment using forested wetlands vs. sand filtration in Louisiana. Ecological Economics 49:331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latterell JJ, Dowdy RH, Clapp CE, Larson WE, Linden DR (1982) Distribution of phosphorus in soils irrigated with municipal waste-water effluent: a 5-year study. Journal of Environmental Quality 11:124–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leo WM, Thomann RV, Gallagher TW (1984) Before and after case studies: comparisons of water quality following municipal treatment plant improvements. USEPA, EPA-430-9-83-007, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman PW, Sevier J, Giulianotti J, Johnson M (2004) Sources of oxygen demand in the lower San Joaquin River, California. Estuaries 27:405–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin G, Shapiro J (1965) Metabolic uptake of phosphorus by wastewater organisms. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 37:800–821

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis GP, Mitchell JD, Andersen CB, Haney DC, Liao M, Sargent KA (2007) Urban influences on stream chemistry and biology in the Big Brushy Creek Watershed, South Carolina. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 182:303–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Likens GE, Bormann FH (1995) Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwack HS, DiLorenzo JL, Huang P, Najarian TO (2006) Development of a simple phosphorus model for a large urban watershed: a case study. Journal of Environmental Engineering 132:538–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JA, Corbett ES (1990) Evaluation of best management practices for controlling nonpoint pollution from silvicultural operations. Water Resources Bulletin 26:41–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magesan GN, Williamson JC, Yeates GW, Lloyd-Jones AR (2000) Wastewater C:N ratio effects on soil hydraulic conductivity and potential mechanisms for recovery. Bioresource Technology 71:21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magnien RE, Summers RM, Sellner KG (1992) External nutrient sources, internal nutrient pools, and phytoplankton production in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 15:497–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mainstone CP, Parr W (2002) Phosphorus in rivers - ecology and management. Science of the Total Environment 282–283:25–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti E, Aumatell J, Gode L (2004) Nutrient retention efficiency in streams receiving inputs from wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matlock MD, Matlock ME, Storm DE, Smolen MD, Henley WJ (1998) Limiting nutrient determination in lotic ecosystems using a quantitative nutrient enrichment periphytometer. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34:1141–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell JB (1980) Impact of urban storm runoff on stream quality near Atlanta, Georgia. USEPA, EPA-600/2-80-094, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell VD, Schwarz GE (1992) The supply and demand for pollution control: evidence from wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23:54–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL (1979) The role of sediments and bryophytes in phosphorus dynamics in a headwater stream ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography 24:365–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Likens GE (1979) Transport and transformation of phosphorus in a forest stream ecosystem. Ecology 60:1255–1269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, McDowell WH, Bott TL, Elwood JW, Ishizaki C, Melack JM, Peckarsky BL, Peterson BJ, Rublee PA (1988) Elemental dynamics in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:410–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migliaccio KW, Haggard BE, Chaubey I, Matlock MD (2007) Linking watershed subbasin characteristics to water quality parameters in War Eagle Creek watershed. Transactions of the ASAE 50:2007–2016

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milbury WF, McCauley D, Hawthorne CH (1971) Operation of conventional activated sludge for maximum phosphorus removal. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 43:1890–1901

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner RJ, Rankin ET (1998) Primary nutrients and the biotic integrity of rivers and streams. Freshwater Biology 40:145–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner RJ, White D, Yoder C (2004) The biotic integrity of streams in urban and suburbanizing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 69:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse GK, Brett SW, Guy JA, Lester JN (1998) Review; phosphorus removal and recovery technologies. The Science of the Total Environment 212:69–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muga HE, Mihelcic JR (2008) Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies. Journal of Environmental Management 88:437–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock J, Roelke D, Gelwick F (2004) Interactions between flow, periphyton, and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: implications for stream restoration effectiveness. Ecological Engineering 22:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Turner MG (2000) A future perspective on North America’s freshwater ecosystems. Ecological Applications 10:958–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold JD, Elwood JW, O’Neill RV, Van Winkle W (1981) Measuring nutrient spiralling in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:860–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols DS (1983) Capacity of natural wetlands to remove nutrients from wastewater. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 55:495–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri AW, Soller JA, Olivieri KJ, Goebel RP, Tchobanoglous G (2005) Seasonal tertiary wastewater treatment in California: an analysis of public health benefits and costs. Water Research 39:3035–3043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ongerth HJ, Ongerth JE (1982) Health consequences of wastewater reuse. Annual Review of Public Health 3:419–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohte N, Dahlgren RA, Silva SR, Kendall C, Kratzer CR, Doctor DH (2007) Sources and transport of algae and nutrients in a California river in a semi-arid climate. Freshwater Biology 52:2476–2493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paerl HW, Dennis RL, Whitall DR (2002) Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen: implications for nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters. Estuaries 25:677–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagilla KR, Urgun-Demirtas M, Ramani R (2006) Low effluent nutrient technologies for wastewater treatment. Water Science & Technology 53:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Painter HA (1970) A review of literature on inorganic nitrogen metabolism in microorganisms. Water Research 4:393–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park SW, Mostaghimi S, Cooke RA, McClellan PW (1994) BMP impacts on watershed runoff, sediment, and nutrient yields. Water Resources Bulletin 30:1011–1023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passell HD, Dahm CN, Bedrick EJ (2007) Ammonia modeling for assessing potential toxicity to fish species in the Rio Grande, 1989–2002. Ecological Applications 17:2087–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passell HD, Dahm CN, Bedrick EJ (2005) Nutrient and organic carbon trends and patterns in the upper Rio Grande, 1975–1999. Science of the Total Environment 345:239–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne WJ (1981) Denitrification. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen TM, Rifai HS, Suarez MP, Stein AR (2005) Bacteria loads from point and nonpoint sources in an urban watershed. Journal of Environmental Engineering 131:1414–1425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson BJ, Wollheim WM, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL, Tank JL, Marti E, Bowden WB, Valett HM, Hershey AE, McDowell WH, Dodds WK, Hamilton SK, Gregory S, Morrall DD (2001) Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettygrove GS, Asano T (1985) Irrigation with reclaimed municipal wastewater, a guidance manual. Report No. 84-1 wr. California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, California. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI

  • Pocernich M, Litke DW (1997) Nutrient concentrations in wastewater treatment plant effluents, South Platte River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:205–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popova YA, Keyworth VG, Haggard BE, Storm DE, Lynch RA, Payton ME (2006) Stream nutrient limitation and sediment interactions in the Eucha-Spavinaw Basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996) Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271:785–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian YL, Mecham B (2005) Long-term effects of recycled wastewater irrigation on soil chemical properties on golf course fairways. Agronomy Journal 97:717–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais NN (2002) Nitrogen in aquatic ecosystems. Ambio 31:102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemond AD, Pringle CM, Ramirez A, Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2002) Landscape variation in phosphorus concentration and effects on detritus-based tropical streams. Limnology and Oceanography 47:278–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer TJ, Alexander RB, Brahana JV, Smith RA (2001) The importance and role of watersheds in the transport of nitrogen. In: Follett RF, Hatfield JL (eds) Nitrogen in the environment: sources, problems and management. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 147–181

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley A (2000) Phosphorus availability. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, New York, pp D18–D37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh B (1991) Long-range planning for water reuse in the city of Los Angeles. Water Science & Technology 24:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh B, Jaques R, Cort R (1987) Reuse of tertiary municipal wastewater effluent for irrigation of raw-eaten food crops: a five year field study. Desalination 67:245–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Z (2005) An aquifer storage and recovery system with reclaimed wastewater to preserve native groundwater resources in El Paso, Texas. Journal of Environmental Management 75:367–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sims JT, Simard RR, Joern BC (1998) Phosphorus loss in agricultural drainage: historical perspective and current research. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:277–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH (1998) Cultural eutrophication of inland, estuarine, and coastal waters. In: Pace ML, Groffman PM (eds) Successes, limitations and frontiers in ecosystem science. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp 7–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: Impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution 100:179–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinath EG (1959) Rapid removal of phosphorus from sewage by activated sludge. Experientia 15:339–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers LE, Nelson DW, Owens LB (1979) Status of inorganic phosphorus in soils irrigated with municipal wastewater. Soil Science 127:340–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens HL, Stensel HD (1998) Effect of operating conditions on biological phosphorus removal. Water Environment Research 70:362–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • State of Florida (2008) 2006 Reuse inventory. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Stow CA, Borsuk ME (2003) Assessing TMDL effectiveness using flow-adjusted concentrations: a case study of the Neuse River, North Carolina. Environmental Science and Technology 37:2043–2050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr JA, McCurley JM III, McMichael FC, Yosie T (1984) Water and wastes: a retrospective assessment of wastewater technology in the United States, 1800–1932. Technology and Culture 25:226–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Teske A, Alm E, Regan JM, Toze S, Rittmann BE, Stahl DA (1994) Evolutionary relationships among ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. The Journal of Bacteriology 176:6623–6630

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thullen JS, Sartoris JJ, Nelson SM (2005) Managing vegetation in surface-flow wastewater-treatment wetlands for optimal treatment performance. Ecological Engineering 25:583–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toze S (2006) Reuse of effluent water-benefits and risks. Agricultural Water Management 80:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. United Nations Population Division, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1999) Protocol for developing nutrient TMDLs. EPA 841-B-99-007, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000a) Progress in water quality: an evaluation of the national investment in municipal wastewater treatment. EPA-832-R-00-008, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000b) Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual. EPA-822-B-00-002, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2001) Integrated water quality monitoring and assessment report guidance memorandum. USEPA, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2004a) Clean watersheds needs survey 2004—report to congress. USEPA, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2004b) Guidelines for water reuse. EPA-625-R-04-108, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo R, Yli-Halla M, Turtola E (2000) Suspended soil as a source of potentially bioavailable phosphorus in surface runoff waters from clay soils. Water Research (Oxford) 34:2477–2482

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:706–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Chang AC, Wu L, Crowley D (2003) Assessing the soil quality of long-term reclaimed wastewater-irrigated cropland. Geoderma 114:261–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells WN (1969) Differences in phosphate uptake rates exhibited by activated sludges. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 41:765–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel MC, Lotter LH, Ekama GA, Loewenthal RE, Marais G (1991) Evaluation of biochemical models for biological excess phosphorus removal. Water Science & Technology 23:567–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel R (2001) Limnology. Lake and River Ecosystems, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman S, Stephenson T, Lester JN, Perry R (1988) The removal of phosphorus during wastewater treatment: a review. Environmental Pollution 49:183–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Smith DW (2002) Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 1:247–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the School of Natural Resources and Environment, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Tropical Research and Education Center, and the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) at the University of Florida for providing research support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources and Environment, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th Street, Homestead, FL, 33031-3314, USA

    Richard O. Carey

  2. Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th Street, Homestead, FL, 33031-3314, USA

    Kati W. Migliaccio

Authors
  1. Richard O. Carey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kati W. Migliaccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kati W. Migliaccio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carey, R.O., Migliaccio, K.W. Contribution of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents to Nutrient Dynamics in Aquatic Systems: A Review. Environmental Management 44, 205–217 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation