Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sources of oxygen demand in the lower San Joaquin River, California

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen concentration below 5 mg 1−1 has characterized the lower tidal portion of the San Joaquin River downstream of Stockton, California, during the summer and fall for the past four decades. Intensive field research in 2000 and 2001 indicated low dissolved oxygen concentration was restricted to the first 14 km of the river, which was deepened to 12 m for shipping, downstream of Stockton. The persistent low dissolved oxygen concentration in the shipping channel was not caused by physical stratification that prevented aeration from vertical mixing or respiration associated wigh high phytoplankton biomass. The low dissolved oxygen concentration was primarily caused bynitrification that produced up to 81% of the total oxygen demand. Stepwise multiple regression analysis isolated dissolved ammonia concentration and carbonaceous oxygen demand as the water quality variables most closely associated with the variation in oxygen demand. Between these two sources, dissolved ammonia concentration accounted for 60% of the total variation in oxygen demand compared with a maximum of 30% for carbonceous oxygen demand. The Stockton wastewater treatment plant and nonpoint sources upstream were direct sources of dissolved ammonia in the channel. A large portion of the dissolved ammonia in the channel was also produced by oxidation of the organic nitrogen load from upstream. The phytoplankton biomass load from upstream primarily produced the carbonaceous oxygen demand. Mass balance models suggested the relative contribution of the wastewater and nonpoint upstream load to the ammonia concentration in the shipping channel at various residence times was dependent on the cumulative effect of ammonification, composition of the upstream load, and net downstream transport of the daily load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Association (APHA). 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, R. C. andW. H. Pierce. 1968. San Joaquin estuary near Stockton, California: An analysis of the dissolved oxygen regimen. Department of the Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, California/Nevada Basins, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berounsky, V. M. andS. W. Nixon. 1993. Rates of nitrification along an estuarine gradient in Narragansett Bay.Estuaries 16:718–730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breitburg, D. 2002. Effects of hypoxia, and the balance between hypoxia and enrichment, on coastal fishes and fisheries.Estuaries 25:767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brion, N., G. Billen, L. Guezennec, andA. Fight. 2000. Distribution of nitrifying activity in the Seine River (France) from Paris to the estuary.Estuaries 23:669–682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carignan, R., A. Blais, andC. Vis. 1998. Measurement of primary production and community respiration in oligotrophic lakes using the Winkler Method.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 55:1078–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. W. Howarth, A. N. Sharpley, andV. H. Smith. 1998.Ecological Applications 1:559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem.Marine Ecology Progress Series 210:223–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. R. andG. S. Brush. 1991. Long-term history of Cheapeake Bay anoxia.Science 254:992–996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiToro, D. M., D. J. O’Connor, andR. V. Thomann. 1971. A Dynamic model of the phytoplankton population in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.Advances in Chemistry Series 106:131–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallock, R. J., R. F. Elwell, and D. H. Fry. 1970. Migrations of adult king salmonOncorhynchus tshawrytscha in the San Joaquin Delta, as demonstrated by the use of sonic tags.California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 151.

  • Hayes, S. P. andJ. S. Lee. 2000. A comparison of fall Stockton channel dissolved oxygen levels in years with low, moderate and high inflows.Sacramento-San Joaquin River Estuary Interagency Ecological Newsletter 13:51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W., A. Sharpley, andD. Walker. 2002. Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: Implications for achieving coastal water quality goals.Estuaries 25:656–676.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jassby, A. D. andJ. E. Cloern. 2000. Organic matter sources and rehabilitation of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (California, USA).Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10:323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassby, A. D., J. E. Cloern, andB. E. Cole. 2002. Annual primary production: Patterns and mechanisms of change in a nutrient-rich tidal ecosystem.Limnology and Oceanography 47:698–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, W. M., E. M. Smith, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, andW. R. Boynton. 1997. Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 150:229–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, C. R., P. D. Dileanis, C. Zamora, andS. R. Silva. 2003. Sources and transport of nutrients, organic carbon, and chlorophyll-a in the San Joaquin River upstream of Vernalis, California during summer and fall 2000 and 2001. Water Resources Investigations Report. U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, A. Y. andB. J. Neilson. 1987. Hypoxia and salinity in Virginia estuaries.Estuaries 10:277–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, P.W. 1996. Water quality conditions in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, 1970–1993. Technical Report. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. C. 1992. Effects of water column processes on dissolved oxygen, nutrients, phytoplankton and zooplankton, p. 61–112.In D. Smith, M. Leffler, and G. Mackiernan (eds.), Oxygen Dynamics in Chesapeake Bay: A Synthesis of Recent Research. Maryland Sea Grant College, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, P. L. 1969. An evaluation of algal decomposition in the San Joaquin estuary. Technical Report to the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration. Department of Civil Engneering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1998. Estuarine Eutrophication Survey, Volume 5: Pacific Coast Region. Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, Silver Spring, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W., S. Granger, andB. Nowicki. 1995. An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay.Biogeochemistry 31:15–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W. andM. E. Q. Pilson. 1983. Nitrogen in estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems, p. 565–649.In E. J. Carpenter and D. G. Capone (eds.), Nitrogen in the Marine Environment. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Officer, C. B., R. B. Biggs, J. L. Taft, L. E. Cronin, M. A. Tyler, andW. R. Boynton. 1984. Chesapeake Bay anoxia: Origin, development and significance.Science 223:22–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paerl, H., R. L. Dennis, andD. R. Whitall. 2002. Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen: Implications for nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters.Estuaries 25:677–693.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pakulski, J. D., R. Benner, R. Amon, B. Eadie, andT. Whitledge. 1995. Community metabolism and nutrient cycling in the Mississippi River plume: Evidence for intense nitrification at intermediate salinities.Marine Ecology Progress Series 117:207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N. N. andR. E. Turner. 2001. Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Description, causes and change, p. 1–36.In N. N. Rabalais and R. E. Turner (eds.), Coastal Hypoxia. Consequences for Living Resources. Coastal and Estuarine Studies, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, A. C. 1958. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment.American Scientist 46:1–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H. H., J. A. Boggs, andW. H. Biggley. 1985. Catastrophic anoxia in the Chesapeake Bay in 1984.Science 228: 70–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (U.S. ACE). 1988. Dissolved oxygen study: Office Report. Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel, Corps of Engineers, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1983. Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. Technical Report EPA-600/4-79-020. U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, R. A. 1974. A Manual on Methods for Measuring Primary Production in Aquatic Environments. International Biological Program Handbook, 12. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  • California department of Water Resources. Unpublished Material. Interagency Ecological Program, Environmental Monitoring Program database. <http://iep.water.ca.gov/emp>

  • Chen, C. W. and W. Tsai. 2002. Improvements and calibrations of Lower San Joaquin River DO Model. <http://www.sjrtmdl.org>

  • City of Stockton. Unpublished Data. San Joaquin River Dissolved Oxygen Study database. <http://iep.water.ca.gov/data.html>

  • Foe, C., M. Gowdy, andM. McCarthy. 2002. Draft strawman allocation of responsibility report. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Sacramento, California. <http://www.sjrtmdl.org>

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones and Stokes Associates. 2002. Stockton Deep Water Ship channel tidal hydraulics and downstream tidal exchange. <http://www.sjrtmdl.org>

  • Lee, G. F. and A. Jones-Lee. 2003. Synthesis and discussion of rindings on the causes and factors influencing low DO in the San Joaquin River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA: Including 2002 data. <http://www.sjrtmdl.org>

  • Lehman, P. andC. Ralston. 2001. The contribution of algal biomass to oxygen depletion in the San Joaquin River, 1999. Environmental Services Office, Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California. <http://www.sjrtmdl.org>

    Google Scholar 

  • Litton, G. M. 2003. Deposition rates and oxygen demands in the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel of the San Joaquin River. <http://www.sjrtmdl.org>

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Environmental Services, Department of Water Resources, 3251 S Street, 95816, Sacramento, California

    P. W. Lehman, J. Sevier, J. Giulianotti & M. Johnson

Authors
  1. P. W. Lehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Sevier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Giulianotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. W. Lehman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehman, P.W., Sevier, J., Giulianotti, J. et al. Sources of oxygen demand in the lower San Joaquin River, California. Estuaries 27, 405–418 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803533

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803533

Keywords

Search

Navigation