Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Winged Ribs: An Underestimated Problem That May Compromise Breast Augmentation Outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chest wall shape is an important aspect to consider when planning a breast augmentation. Minor chest wall deformities are usually underestimated by the patient and surgeon and may compromise postoperative outcomes. Lower costal cartilage dysmorphia or winged rib is one of these minor underestimated chest wall deformities characterized by a visible and palpable cartilaginous prominence under the inframammary fold and causes discomfort in patients decreasing the satisfaction with the breast augmentation surgery. For these patients, the author utilized an innovative surgical technique that allows resection of the protruding cartilages and placement of breast implants through the same surgical incision. Six patients with winged ribs underwent breast augmentation and costal cartilage resection via this method and there were no intraoperative or early postoperative complications, and all patients were satisfied with the aesthetical result after 6 months of follow-up. The presented surgical technique has a short learning curve with excellent postoperative results. Cases are presented to demonstrate the improved postoperative chest wall contour combined with breast augmentation outcome.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plastic Surgery Statistics (2018) American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Agost. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2018.pdf. Accessed Aug 2018

  2. Lista F, Ahmad J (2013) Evidence-based medicine: augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1684–1696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ors S (2017) Incidence and classification of chest wall deformities in breast augmentation patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(6):1280–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hidalgo DA, Spector JA (2014) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(4):567e–583e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acastello E, Garrido P (2009) Congenital chest wall malformations: 22 years experience in a childrens center. Rev Med Clin Condes 20(6):758–767

    Google Scholar 

  6. Acastello E, Maljuf F, Garrido P, Barbosa LM, Peredo A (2003) Sternal Clef: a surgical opportunity. J Pediatr Surg 38(2):178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Acastello E(2006) Patologías de la pared torácica en pediatría. Editorial El Ateneo, Buenos Aires

  8. Eduardo Acastello PG (2011) Congenital malformations of the torácica wall. buenos aires

  9. Donnelly LF, Frush DP, Foss JN, O’Hara SM, Bisset GS (1999) Anterior chest wall: frequency of anatomic variations in children. Radiology 212(3):837–840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolter TP, Lorenz S, Neuhann-Lorenz C (2010) Aesthetic breast augmentation and thoracic deformities. Aesthet Plast Surg 34(5):612–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Torre M, Rapuzzi G, Jasonni V, Varela P (2012) Chest wall deformities: an overview on classification and surgical options. Topics in Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.5772/25950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma IT, Rebecca AM, Notrica DM, McMahon LE, Jaroszewski DE (2015) Pectus excavatum in adult women: repair and the impact of prior or concurrent breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(2):303e–312e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moscona RA, Fodor L (2011) How to perform breast augmentation safely for a pectus excavatum patient. Aesth Plast Surg. 35(2):198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bayram Y, Zor F, Karagoz H, Kulahci Y, Afifi AM, Ozturk S (2015) Challenging breast augmentations: The influence of preoperative anatomical features on the final result. Aesthetic surgery journal. 36(3):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Obermeyer RJ, Goretsky MJ (2012) Chest wall deformities in pediatric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 92(3):669–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricio Andrades.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is required; all the participants gave their informed consent in writing for the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andrades, P., Quispe, D., Dominguez, C. et al. Winged Ribs: An Underestimated Problem That May Compromise Breast Augmentation Outcomes. Aesth Plast Surg 43, 899–904 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01385-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01385-7

Keywords

Navigation