Abstract
Although chest wall deformities (CWDs) are seen four times more often in males than in females, most patients who consult plastic surgery clinics in our country are females. Breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy were performed with a total of 812 breast implants in 406 patients. Forty-three of these patients had various CWDs. The CWD patient ages ranged from 18 to 43Â years. Patients were observed for 6Â months to 8Â years (mean of approximately 3Â years). Pectus excavatum (PE) was present in 22 patients, pectus carinatum (PC) in five patients, Poland syndrome (PS) in two patients, sunken chest deformity (SCD) in three patients, barrel chest deformity (BCD) in five patients, body builder deformity (BBD) in three patients, and long upper chest wall (LCW) in three patients. None of the patients had functional or cardiac deformities. A total of 86 round, anatomically textured gel implants in various profiles were used within a range of implant volumes for all patients. There were no serious complications in the 43 CWD patients. The frequency of CWDs in the total population of 406 patients was approximately 10.6%. PE was present in 51% (22/43) of the patients with CWDs. The deformity rates among patients who underwent augmentation mammoplasty were as follows (%): PE, 5.4; PC, 1.23; PS, 0.5; SCD, 0.73; BCD, 1.23; BBD, 0.73; and LCW, 0.73. The three most common deformities observed in this study were PE, PC, and BCD. The least common deformity was PS. Patients with CWDs should be carefully evaluated preoperatively, and all the associated measurements and calculations must be meticulously performed. The implant selection may differ according to the deformity pattern. For example, in patients with PE, prostheses with larger base diameters cover the deformity better. Although high-profile prostheses are preferred on the affected side in cases of PS and SCD, low- or middle-profile prostheses are preferred on the opposite side. Despite this common consensus, there was an asymmetry of approximately 1Â cm between the sides, as observed postoperatively. However, the patients did not express dissatisfaction with this situation. Low-profile prostheses should be preferred for PC and BCD protruding CWDs because asymmetry becomes more prominent and over-projection occurs more frequently in cases of high-profile prostheses. The BBD projection is also a problem. For this reason, high-profile prostheses should be preferred in these patients. It is possible to obtain satisfactory results by using appropriate breast implants in patients with CWDs.
Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Molik KA, Engum SA, Rescorla FJ et al (2001) Pectus excavatum repair. Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques. J Pediatr Surg 36:324–328
Fonkalsrud EW, Beanes S (2001) Surgical management of pectus carinatum. 30 year’s experience. World J Surg 25:898–903
Fonkalsrud EW (2003) Current management of pectus excavatum. World J Surg 27:502–508
DeUgarte D, Choi E, Fonkalsrud EW (2002) Repair of recurrent pectus deformities. Am Surg 68:1075–1079
Fonkalsrud EW, Dunn JCY, Atkinson JB (2000) Repair of pectus excavatum deformities: 30 years’ experience with 375 patients. Ann Surg 231:443–448
Haller JA, Kramer SS, Lietman SA (1987) Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 22:904–906
Scott LS, Christopher VP, Edward SL et al (2004) Anterior thoracic hypoplasia: a separate entity from Poland syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(1):69–77
Hodgkinson DJ (2002) The management of anterior chest wall deformity in patients presenting for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1714–1723
Pierce JA, Ebert RV (1958) The barrel deformity of the chest, the senile lung and obstructive pulmonary emphysema. Am J Med 25(1):13–22
Ors S (2006) A new technique for volume measurement of asymmetrical breasts. Erciyes Med J 28(1):13–18
Robert CS (1996) Congenital chest wall deformities. Curr Probl Surg 33(6):473–535
Shamberger RC, Welch KJ (1987) Surgical correction of pectus carinatum. J Pediatr Surg 22(1):48–53
Steinmann C, Krille S, Mueller A, Weber P, Reingruber B, Martin A (2011) Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: a control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(5):1138–1145
Einsiedel E, Clausner A (1999) Funnel chest. Psychological and psychosomatic aspects in children, youngsters, and young adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 40(5):733–736
Ravitch MM (1960) Operative correction of pectus carinatum (pigeon breast). Ann Surg 151(5):705–714
Clarkson P (1962) Poland’s syndactyly. Guys Hosp Rep 111:335
Spear SL, Romm S, Hakki A, Little JW (1987) Costal cartilage sculpturing as an adjunct to augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:921
Marks MW, Argenta LC, Izenberg PH, Mes LGB (1990) Management of the chest-wall deformity in male patients with Poland’s syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:674
Samuels TH, Haider MA, Kirkbride P (1996) Poland’s syndrome: a mammographic presentation. Am J Radiol 166:347
Marks MW, Iacobucci J (2000) Reconstruction of congenital chest wall deformities using solid silicone onlay prostheses. Chest Surg Clin N Am 10:341
Delay E, Guerid S (2015) The role of fat grafting in breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 42(3):315–323
Seyfer AE, Icochea R, Graeber GM (1988) Poland’s anomaly. Natural history and long-term results of chest wall reconstruction in 33 patients. Ann Surg 208:776–782
Gatti JE (1997) Poland’s deformity reconstructions with a customized, extrasoft silicone prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg 39:122–130
Marks MW, Argenta LC, Izenberg PH, Mes LG (1991) Management of the chest-wall deformity in male patients with Poland’s syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:674–678 (discussion 9)
Rintala AE, Nordstrom RE (1989) Treatment of severe developmental asymmetry of the female breast. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 23:231–235
Yang H, Lee H (2011) Successful use of squeezed-fat grafts to correct a breast affected by Poland syndrome. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(3):418–425
Hodgkinson DJ (1997) Chest wall implants: their use for pectus excavatum, pectoralis muscle tears, Poland’s syndrome, and muscular insufficiency. Aesthet Plast Surg 21:7
Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S (2006) Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(7 Suppl):7S–13S (discussion 14S, 15S–17S)
Acknowledgements
The author has no financial interests in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ors, S. Incidence and Classification of Chest Wall Deformities in Breast Augmentation Patients. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 1280–1290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0953-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0953-5