Abstract
Background
Implant rippling is a frequent complication following breast augmentation or implant-based reconstruction and results in significant patient dissatisfaction. Traditionally, the treatment has been to replace the implant, often placing it in a subpectoral pocket to reduce the risk of recurrence. Other techniques, such as increasing the implant size or tightening the capsule, can also be used. Recently, however, there has been much interest in alternative treatments, including fat grafting or insertion of an acellular dermal matrix.
Methods
We review the evidence base for emerging treatments and propose a classification to grade severity, based on the typical clinical presentation of rippling: Grade 1—MILD—rippling is palpable but not visible: (1a) palpable in the lower outer quadrant, (1b) palpable in the upper inner quadrant (cleavage area); Grade 2—MODERATE—rippling is visible only when the patient bends forward; Grade 3—SEVERE—rippling is visible with the patient upright.
Conclusion
Our proposed classification aims to standardise the clinical description of rippling, which will be valuable in determining the efficacy of new treatments and better characterising long-term complications from breast augmentations or reconstructions.
Level of Evidence V
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Busse B, Orbay H, Sahar DE (2014) Sterile acellular dermal collagen as a treatment for rippling deformity of breast. Case Rep Surg 2014:876254
Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, Mahoney A, Thiels C, Nahai FR, Hester TR, Nahai F (2011) A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1300–1310
Strasser EJ (2006) Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: one surgeon’s observations. Aesthet Surg J 26:45–50
Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767
Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA (2012) Mentor contour profile gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1381–1391
Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2007) Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:482–489
Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Acellular dermal matrix for reoperative breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:932–938
Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21:81–84
Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, Lin SJ, Slavin SA (2010) The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1711–1720
Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2013) Efficacy of acellular dermal matrices in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery: a 6-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 33:389–399
Baxter RA (2003) Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1692–1696
Nahabedian MY, Spear SL (2011) Acellular dermal matrix for secondary procedures following prosthetic breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 31:38S–50S
Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1140–1148
Pozner JN, White JB, Newman MI (2013) Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33:681–690
Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Young VL, Hume KM, Crotty CA, Rubin JP (2013) Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the American society of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:35–46
Kanchwala SK, Glatt BS, Conant EF, Bucky LP (2009) Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:409–418
Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29:360–376
Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:558–568
Hammond DC, O’Connor EA, Scheer JR (2015) Total envelope fat grafting: a novel approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:691–694
Gargano F, Moloney DM, Arnstein PM (2002) Use of a capsular flap to prevent palpable wrinkling of implants. Br J Plast Surg 55:269
Massiha H (2002) Scar tissue flaps for the correction of post implant breast rippling. Ann Plast Surg 48:505–507
McGregor JC, Bahia H (2004) A possible new way of managing breast implant rippling using an autogenous fascia lata patch. Br J Plast Surg 57:372–374
Collis N, Platt AJ, Batchelor AG (2001) Pectoralis major ‘Trapdoor’ flap for silicone breast implant medial knuckle deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2133–2135
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Miriam Waite, medical graphic designer at Royal Preston Hospital, for producing the figures.
Funding
The authors did not receive any funds or contributions to support this work. There are no financial conflicts of interest to declare. None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NMP and JRS had full involvement with the literature search, content and preparation of the manuscript and agree with the final submitted document.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pantelides, N.M., Srinivasan, J.R. Rippling Following Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction: Aetiology, Emerging Treatment Options and a Novel Classification of Severity. Aesth Plast Surg 42, 980–985 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1117-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1117-y