Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systemic Inflammatory Reaction After Silicone Breast Implant

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Systemic inflammation after augmentation mammaplasty with modern silicone implants is not currently recognized. In a prospective controlled study, C-reactive protein and other variables were monitored, aiming to test this hypothesis in a young cohort of patients.

Methods

Females (18-30 years old, BMI = 18.5-30 kg/m2, N = 52) were consecutively recruited for breast implant (n = 24, Group I) and for abdominal liposuction (n = 28, Group II/Controls). Patients were interviewed at baseline and followed until 6 months after operation. Variables included demographic and clinical information, surgical outcome, inflammatory markers and autoantibodies.

Results

Operations were well tolerated, without surgical or infectious complications. Mean prosthesis size was 258 ± 21 ml (range = 220-280) and mean aspirate of liposuction was 1972 ± 499 ml (range = 1200-3000). Preoperative, 2-month, and 6-month C-reactive protein concentrations for breast implant patients were 1.3 ± 1.2, 4.8 ± 3.0, and 4.3 ± 6.4 mg/l and for liposuction 3.5 ± 2.7, 3.5 ± 2.1, and 2.2 ± 2.2 mg/l, respectively. Change at 2 months was significant (p = 0.001). Autoantibody investigation failed to reveal remarkable aberrations, except for anticardiolipin elevation, which was nearly symmetrical in the two groups.

Conclusion

C-reactive protein levels increased after operation and correlated with proinflammatory and procoagulatory indices. A mild increase in anticardiolipin IgM occurred but differences between populations were lacking. Despite excellent cosmetic outcomes and lack of complications, acute phase reaction could signal ongoing immunogenicity of silicone and long-term monitoring is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noone RB (1997) A review of the possible health implications of silicone breast implants. Cancer 79:1747–1756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hölmich LR, Vejborg IM, Conrad C, Sletting S, Høier-Madsen M, Fryzek JP, McLaughlin JK, Kjøller K, Wiik A, Friis S (2004) Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:204–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Narins RS, Beer K (2006) Liquid injectable silicone: a review of its history, immunology, technical considerations, complications, and potential. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(3 Suppl):77S–84S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spear SL, Jespersen MR (2010) Breast implants: saline or silicone? Aesthet Surg J 30:557–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R (eds) (1999) Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Safety of Silicone Breast Implants: safety of silicone breast implants. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niechajev I, Jurell G, Lohjelm L (2007) Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Psillakis JM, Facchina PH, Kharmandayan P, Trillo L, Canzi WC, Aguiar HR (2010) Review of 1,477 breast augmentation payients using PERTHESE silicone implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt A, Bengtsson A, Tylman M, Blomqvist L (2007) Pro-inflammatory cytokines in elective flap surgery. J Surg Res 137:117–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. ASAPS (2010) www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/statsquickfacts.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2010

  10. Anderson JM, Rodrigues A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20:86–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wyatt LE, Sinow JD, Wollman JS, Sami DA, Miller TA (1998) The influence of time on human breast capsule histology: smooth and textured silicone-surfaced implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1922–1931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Siggelkow W, Faridi A, Spiritus K, Klinge U, Rath W, Klosterhalfen B (2003) Histological analysis of silicone breast implant capsules and correlation with capsular contracture. Biomaterials 24:1101–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Petzold C, Rubert M, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Monjo M (2011) In vivo performance of titanium implants functionalized with eicosapentaenoic acid and UV irradiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 96:83–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bond JS, Duncan JA, Mason T, Sattar A, Boanas A, O’Kane S, Ferguson MW (2008) Scar redness in humans: how long does it persist after incisional and excisional wounding? Plast Reconstr Surg 121:487–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. U.S. FDA (2010) Medical devices, breast implants. Available at www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/labeling/mentor_patient_labeling_5900.html#9. Accessed 27 Dec 2010

  16. Goncalves WL, Graceli JB, Santos RL, Cicilini MA, Bissoli NS, Abreu GR, Moysés MR (2009) Ultrasound lipoclasia on subcutaneous adipose tissue to produce acute hyperglycemia and enhance acute inflammatory response in healthy female rats. Dermatol Surg 35:1741–1745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein S, Fontana L, Young VL, Coggan AR, Kilo C, Patterson BW, Mohammed BS (2004) Absence of an effect of liposuction on insulin action and risk factors for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 350:2549–2557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Levitsky J, Freifeld A, Lyden E, Stoner J, Florescu D, Langnas A, Brian Stevens R, Hardiman P, Hill L, Kalil AC (2009) Evaluation of the coagulation and inflammatory responses in solid organ transplant recipient and donors. Clin Transplant 23:943–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanklin DR, Smalley DL (1999) Dynamics of wound healing after silicone device implantation. Exp Mol Pathol 67:26–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rabelo F, Oliveira CP, Faintuch J, Mazo DF, Lima VM, Stefano JT, Barbeiro HV, Soriano FG, Alves VA, Carrilho FJ (2010) Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in steatosis and steatohepatitis. Obes Surg 20:906–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morais AA, Faintuch J, Leal AA, Noe JA, Bertollo DM, Morais RC, Cabrini D (2011) Inflammation and biochemical features of bariatric candidates: does gender matter? Obes Surg 21(1):71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seyhan H, Kopp J, Beier JP, Vogel M, Akkermann O, Kneser U, Schwartz S, Hartmann A, Horch RE (2011) Smooth and textured silicone surfaces of modified gel mammary prostheses cause a different impact on fibroproliferative properties of dermal fibroblasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(3):e60–e66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Faintuch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, M.M., Modolin, M., Faintuch, J. et al. Systemic Inflammatory Reaction After Silicone Breast Implant. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 789–794 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9688-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9688-x

Keywords

Navigation