Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do common cuckoo chicks suffer nest predation more than host nestlings?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nestlings of brood parasites exhibit more intensive begging than offspring of their hosts to gain sufficient amount of food or competitive advantage over host nestlings. This begging behaviour should be costly because exuberant acoustic begging may more likely attract nest predators. However, to date, nobody has explored the survival of nests with and without chicks of brood parasites in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) host system. Here, we analysed an extensive dataset of 817 great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) and 788 reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) nests to explore the relationships between nest predation and parasitism status (parasitized vs. non-parasitized), nest contents (cuckoo chick vs. host nestlings) and age of nestlings. We found that although parasitized nests had higher predation rate than non-parasitized nests in the incubation stage, the effect of original parasitism status almost disappeared in the nestling stage. In both host species, nests with younger cuckoo chicks survived similarly to nests with host nestlings of the same age (till the ninth day of age). Later on, however, nest contents influenced nest predation in each species differently. While nests with older cuckoo chicks (from the ninth to the 17th day of age) did not survive worse that host nestlings in the great reed warbler, older cuckoos survived much worse than host nestlings in reed warbler nests. Finally, nest survival decreased with nestling age in all three species. Thus, it seems that common cuckoo chicks can be penalized for more intensive begging only in nests of smaller reed warbler hosts.

Significance statement

Parental feeding of young is in birds frequently accompanied by striking nestlings begging behaviour serving as a signal of their need. Brood parasites exhibit even more intense food solicitation than their hosts which may attract predators to the nest. However, this hypothesis has never been tested in a widely studied brood parasite species—the common cuckoo. Here, we analysed survival of more than 1600 nests of its two main host species. We found that nests containing older common cuckoo chicks were depredated more frequently than nests with host own nestlings only in the smaller reed warbler hosts but not in the larger and more aggressive great reed warblers. This shows that the intensity of begging could be costly in terms of nest predation at least in some common cuckoo host species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astie AA, Reboreda JC (2006) Costs of egg punctures and parasitism by shiny cowbirds (Molothrus bonariensis) at creamy-bellied thrush (Turdus amaurochalinus) nests. Auk 123:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, et al. (2006) Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol 19:1901–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bensch S (1996) Female mating status and reproductive success in the great reed warbler: is there a potential cost of polygyny that requires compensation? J Anim Ecol 65:283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briskie J, Martin P, Martin T (1999) Nest predation and the evolution of nestling begging calls. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briskie JV, Naugler CT, Leech SM (1994) Begging intensity of nestling birds varies with sibling relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burhans DE, Dearborn D, Thompson F III, Faaborg J (2002) Factors affecting predation at songbird nests in old fields. J Wildl. Manage 66:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SH, Kilner RM, Fuisz T, Davies NB (2003) Differences in the nestling begging calls of hosts and host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Anim Behav 65:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čapek M, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Honza M (2010) Repeated presentations of the common cuckoo increase nest defense by the Eurasian reed warbler but do not induce it to make recognition errors. Condor 112:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell MA, Bachman GC (2002) Energetic costs of begging behaviour. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 143–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C (2007) Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance? J Evol Biol 20:1218–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (1992) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol VI. Warblers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T. And a.D. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2011) Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool 284:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Kilner RM, Noble DG (1998) Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Madden JR, Butchart SHM (2004) Learning fine-tunes a specific response of nestlings to the parental alarm calls of their own species. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2297–2304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Madden JR, Butchart SHM, Rutila J (2006) A host-race of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus with nestlings attuned to the parental alarm calls of the host species. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:693–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC (1998) Begging behavior and food acquisition by brown-headed cowbird nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC (1999) Brown-headed cowbird nestling vocalizations and risk of nest predation. Auk 116:448–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC, Lichtenstein G (2002) Begging behaviour and host exploitation in parasitic cowbirds. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 361–388

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore SJ, White GC, Knopf FL (2002) Advanced techniques for modelling avian nest survival. Ecology 83:3476–3488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner K (1981) Das Wegnehmen von Wirtsvogeleiern durch den Kuckuck (Cuculus canorus). Ornithol Mitt 33:115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehringer F (1979) Etude sur le pillage par le Coucou, Cuculus canorus, des oeufs de la Rousserolle effarvatte. Nos Oiseaux 35:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gochfeld M (1979) Brood parasite and host coevolution: interactions between shiny cowbirds and two species of meadowlarks. Am Nat 113:855–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götmark F (1992) The effects of investigator disturbance on nesting birds. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology, vol 9. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 63–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2006) Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2007) Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2008) Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies: their importance and evolutionary origins. J Ethol 26:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Biol Lett 270:S73–S75

    Google Scholar 

  • Haff T, Magrath R (2010) Vulnerable but not helpless: nestlings are fine-tuned to cues of approaching danger. Anim Behav 79:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haff T, Magrath R (2011) Calling at a cost: elevated nestling calling attracts predators to active nests. Biol Lett 7:493–495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon S, Wilson S, McCallum C (2009) Does cowbird parasitism increase predation risk to American redstart nests? Oikos 118:1035–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell D (1994) Experimental evidence that nestling begging behaviour incurs a cost due to nest predation. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell D (1999) The effect of predation on begging-call evolution in nestling wood warblers. Anim Behav 57:893–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell D (2002) Begging behaviour and nest predation. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 163–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber M (2000) Nest predation and cowbird parasitism in song sparrows. J Field Ornithol 71:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber M (2014) Mafia or farmer? Coevolutionary consequences of retaliation and farming as predatory strategies upon host nests by avian brood parasites. Coevolution 2:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holen ØH, Saetre GP, Slagsvold T, Stenseth NC (2001) Parasites and supernormal manipulation. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2551–2558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Šulc M, Jelínek V, Požgayová M, Procházka P (2014) Brood parasites lay eggs matching the appearance of host clutches. Proc R Soc Lond B 281: 20132665

  • Ibáñez-Álamo J, Arco L, Soler M (2012) Experimental evidence for a predation cost of begging using active nests and real chicks. J Ornithol 153:801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janisch M (1948) Fight between cuckoo Cuculus C. canorus L. and great reed warbler Acrocephalus A. arundinaceus L. Aquila 55:291

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelínek V, Procházka P, Požgayová M, Honza M (2014) Common cuckoos Cuculus canorus change their nest-searching strategy according to the number of available host nests. Ibis 156:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2001) A growth cost of begging in captive canary chicks. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11394–11398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Davies NB (1999) How selfish is a cuckoo chick? Anim Behav 58:797–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Noble DG, Davies NB (1999) Signals of need in parent–offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven O, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Honza M (1999) Host species affects the growth rate of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krams I, Krama T, Igaune K, Mänd R (2007) Long-lasting mobbing of the pied flycatcher increases the risk of nest predation. Behav Ecol 18:1082–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech S, Leonard M (1997) Begging and the risk of predation in nestling birds. Behav Ecol 8:1990–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard M, Horn A, Porter J (2003) Does begging affect growth in nestling tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:573–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein G (1998) Parasitism by shiny cowbirds of rufous-bellied thrushes. Condor 100:680–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden JR, Kilner RM, Davies NB (2005) Nestling responses to adult food and alarm calls: 2. Cowbirds and red-winged blackbirds reared by eastern phoebe hosts. Anim Behav 70:629–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massoni V, Reboreda J (1998) Costs of brood parasitism and the lack of defences on the yellow-winged blackbird - shiny cowbird system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Gross H, Crick HQP, Greenwood JJD (1997) The effect of observers visiting the nests of passerines: an experimental study. Bird Study 44:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith JM, Harper D (2000) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald P, Wilson D, Evans C (2009) Nestling begging increases predation risk, regardless of spectral characteristics or avian mobbing. Behav Ecol 20:821–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mermoz M, Reboreda J (1998) Nesting success in Brown-and-yellow Marshbirds: effects of timing, nest site, and brood parasitism. Auk 115:871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mérő TO, Žuljević A (2014) Great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Acrocephalus 34:130

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen L, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH (2000) Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis 142:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnár B (1944) The cuckoo in the Hungarian plain. Aquila 51:100–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Honza M (2000) Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ecography 23:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady DR, Hill DP, Barclay RMR (1996) Nest visitation by humans does not increase predation on chestnut-collared longspur eggs and young. J Field Ornithol 67:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Øien I, Honza M, Moksnes A, Roskaft E (1996) The risk of parasitism in relation to the distance from reed warbler nests to cuckoo perches. J Anim Ecol 65:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega CP, Ortega JC (2003) Brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism on warbling vireos (Vireo gilvus) in Southwest Colorado. Auk 120:759–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega CP, Ortega JC, Rapp CA, Vorisek S, Backensto SA, Palmer DW (1997) Effect of research activity on the success of American robin nests. J Wildl. Manage 61:948–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platzen D, Magrath R (2004) Parental alarm calls suppress nestling vocalization. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1271–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Požgayová M, Procházka P, Honza M (2009) Sex-specific defence behaviour against brood parasitism in a host with female-only incubation. Behav Process 81:34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redondo T (1993) Exploitation of host mechanism for parental care by avian brood parasites. Etología 3:235–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondo T, Zuñiga JM (2002) Dishonest begging and host manipulation by Clamator cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 389–412

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Giroñés M, Zúñiga J, Redondo T (2001) Effects of begging on growth rates of nestling chicks. Behav Ecol 12:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Meilvang D, Bičík V, Jemelíková J, Honza M (2002) No evidence for recognition errors in Acrocephalus warblers. J Avian Biol 33:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Hagen K (1992) Parasitierung und Brutverluste durch den Kuckuck (Cuculus canorus) bei Teich- und Sumpfrohrsänger (Acrocephalus scirpaceus, A. palustris) in Mittel- und Westeuropa. J Ornithol 133:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šicha V, Procházka P, Honza M (2007) Hopeless solicitation? Host-absent vocalization in the common cuckoo has no effect on feeding rate of reed warblers. J Ethol 25:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG, Møller AP (1995) Magpie host manipulation by great spotted cuckoos: evidence for an avian mafia? Evolution 49:770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Soler JJ, Martínez JG, Moreno J (1999) Begging behaviour and its energetic cost in great spotted cuckoo and magpie host chicks. Can J Zool 77:1794–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf KJ, Theimer TC, McLeod MA, Koronkiewicz TJ (2012) Distance from riparian edge reduces brood parasitism of southwestern willow flycatchers, whereas parasitism increases nest predation risk. J Wildl. Manage 76:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnka A, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Capek M, Honza M (2016) Chemical defence in avian brood parasites: production and function of repulsive secretions in common cuckoo chicks. J Avian Biol 47:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidinger K (2008) Nest monitoring does not increase nest predation in open-nesting songbirds: inference from continuous nest-survival data. Auk 125:859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:S120–S139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1975) Study of cuckoos and reed warblers. Brit Birds 68:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1979) Parasitism and nest predation in parasitic cuckoos. Am Nat 113:157–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Milica Požgayová, Miroslav Čapek, Marek M. Abraham, Radovan Beňo, Petra Baslerová, Lucie Halová, Jaroslav Koleček, Klára Morongová, Peter Samaš, Kateřina Sosnovcová, Zuzana Šebelíková and Michal Šulc for their assistance in the field; Zdeněk Faltýnek Fric for his help with the programme MARK; and Miloš Krist and anonymous referees for their comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We are also grateful to the managers of the Hodonín Fish Farm for the permission to conduct the fieldwork on their grounds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Květná 8, 60365, Brno, Czech Republic

    Václav Jelínek, Tereza Karasová, Petr Procházka & Marcel Honza

  2. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic

    Václav Jelínek

  3. Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, 771 46, Olomouc, Czech Republic

    Karel Weidinger

Authors
  1. Václav Jelínek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tereza Karasová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karel Weidinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petr Procházka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcel Honza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Václav Jelínek.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (grant number P506/12/2404) and by the institutional support of Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i. (RVO: 68081766).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Bird catching, ringing and nest checking were conducted under licence (numbers 906, 1050 and 1058) and followed rules issued by the Czech Bird Ringing Centre.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Soler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jelínek, V., Karasová, T., Weidinger, K. et al. Do common cuckoo chicks suffer nest predation more than host nestlings?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 1975–1987 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2203-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2203-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation