Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies: their importance and evolutionary origins

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Avian chicks use different begging strategies when soliciting parental care. A novel begging strategy was recently observed in Horsfield’s hawk-cuckoo Hierococcyx hyperythrus (=Cuculus fugax). Chicks of this brood-parasitic species raise and shake their wings and display to fosterers a gape-coloured patch on the undersides of their wings. Although the gape-coloured wing-patch may be a unique trait of Horsfield’s hawk-cuckoo, wing-shaking in the context of begging is virtually universal in both brood parasites and their hosts. A simple qualitative comparison across different avian taxa suggests that wing-shake begging is most probably an ancestral feature of cuckoos and perhaps all altricial birds. The wing-shaking may be an honest signal of chick quality. It could also reduce the risk of predation if wing-shaking was coupled with reduced loudness of begging. Horsfield’s hawk-cuckoo chicks could have exploited the universal pre-existing host responsiveness to wing-shake begging. Evolution could have then further proceeded by making the wing-shaking more conspicuous by addition of another stimulus—the unique colourful wing-patch. I also hypothesize that wing-shake begging may have evolved from pre-fledging restlessness and is used secondarily in courtship displays, threatening postures, and distraction displays by adults. Further discussions and tests of these hypotheses may facilitate research into the so far unstudied phylogenetic history of avian chick-begging strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez F (2004) The conspicuous gape of the nestling common cuckoo Cuculus canorus as a supernormal stimulus for rufous bush chat Cercotrichas galactotes hosts. Ardea 92:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong EA (1965) Bird display and behaviour. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Budden AE, Wright J (2001) Falling on deaf ears: the adaptive significance of begging in the absence of a parent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (ed) (1985) Birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T. & A.D. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Kilner RM, Noble DG (1998) Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC, Lichtenstein G (2002) Begging behaviour and host exploitation in parasitic cowbirds. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 361–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1989) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith CB (1982) Displays of Count Raggi’s Bird-of-Paradise Paradisaea raggiana and congeneric species. Emu 81:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB (1990) Ornithology. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (eds) (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol. 9. Columbiformes—Piciformes. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden

  • Goodwin D (1982) Estrildid finches of the world. British Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Götmark F, Ahlström M (1997) Parental preference for red mouth in a songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:959–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2005) Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc 84:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2006a) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2006b) Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim T (2007) Equal rights for chick brood parasites. Ann Zool Fennici 44:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Honza M (2001) Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo’s host? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Pagel DM (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Ramsey CK (2003) Honesty in host-parasite communication signals: the case for begging by fledgling brown-headed cowbirds Molothrus ater. J Avian Biol 34:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard PA (1997) The avian brood parasites. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilham L (1962) Reproductive behaviour of downy woodpeckers. Condor 64:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner R (1995) When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need? Proc R Soc Lond B 260:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Johnstone RA (1997) Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? Trends Ecol Evol 12:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Noble DG, Davies NB (1999) Signals of need in parent–offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard ML, Horn AG (1998) Need and nestmates affect begging in tree swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard ML, Horn AG (2006) Age-related changes in signalling of need by nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Ethology 112:1020–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein G (2001) Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitising rufous-bellied thrushes: chick–chick competition or parental manipulation? Anim Behav 61:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott DF (1991) Bronzy sunbirds tolerate intrusion on foraging territories by female golden-winged sunbirds that perform begging display. J Field Ornithol 62:492–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchevsky AS (1987) Kukushka i ee vospitateli. Izdateľstvo Leningradskogo Universiteta, Leningrad

  • McLean IG (1988) Breeding behaviour of the long-tailed cuckoo on Little Barrier Island. Notornis 35:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock DW (2004) More than kin, less than kind. Belknap Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse EL, Brewer R (1968) Feeding of nestling and fledgling Eastern kingbirds. Auk 85:44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien PH, Dow DD (1979) Vocalizations of nestling noisy miners Manorina melanocephala. Emu 79:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB (2005) The cuckoos. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Redondo T, Castro F (1992) Signalling of nutritional need by magpie nestlings. Ethology 92:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sealy SG, Lorenzana JC (1997) Feeding of nestling and fledgling brood parasites by individuals other than the foster parents: a review. Can J Zool 75:1739–1752

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TE, Leonard ML, Smith BD (2005) Provisioning rules and chick competition in asynchronously hatching common terns (Sterna hirundo). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG, Moreno J (1999) Begging behaviour and its energetic cost in great spotted cuckoo and its magpie host chicks. Can J Zool 77:1794–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka KD, Morimoto G, Ueda K (2005) Yellow wing-patch of a nestling Horsfield’s hawk cuckoo Cuculus fugax induces miscognition by hosts: mimicking a gape? J Avian Biol 36:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka KD, Ueda K (2005) Horsfield’s hawk-cuckoo nestlings simulate multiple gapes for begging. Science 308:653–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vestjens WJM (1977) Breeding behaviour and ecology of the Australian pelican, Pelecanus conspicillatus, in New South Wales. Aust Wildl Res 4:37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) (2002) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to M.E. Hauber, M. Leonard, V. Remeš, M. Soler, B.G. Stokke, K.D. Tanaka, and anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. I thank D. Campbell for correcting the English. My work was supported by grants MSM6198959212 and GACR 206/03/D234.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Palacký University, tř. Svobody 26, 77146, Olomouc, Czech Republic

    Tomáš Grim

Authors
  1. Tomáš Grim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Grim.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

MPEG 3.69 MB

About this article

Cite this article

Grim, T. Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies: their importance and evolutionary origins. J Ethol 26, 9–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-007-0037-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-007-0037-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation