Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social facilitation of exploration in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social environment can exert a powerful influence on the expression of an individual’s behaviour patterns. For example, social facilitation occurs where individuals are more likely to express a given behaviour, or express it a greater rate, in the presence of conspecifics. Social facilitation is partly driven by an individual’s perception of risk, which is a function both of the size of its social group and the information that it gathers relating to predator activity and risk. Here I tested the effects of social group size (one, two, four, eight or 16 fish) and the presence of ‘social’, ‘predation’ or ‘neutral’ chemical cues (derived respectively from live conspecifics, injured conspecifics or a blank water control) on the exploratory behaviour of juvenile mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in a novel environment. Focal fish in larger groups explored a greater proportion of the arena during the course of the experiment, demonstrating social facilitation of exploration. After 4 h in the arena, focal fish in all group sizes showed significantly reduced swimming activity, suggesting that the initial faster swimming activity of fish on entry to the arena may be in response to the motivation to explore. The presence of predation cues in the environment had the effect of reducing exploratory behaviour across groups in a novel environment, whereas social cues had no effect on exploratory behaviour. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that there is a high degree of context dependency in the expression of exploratory behaviour, with a strong influence of both the presence of conspecifics and cues relating to potential danger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, Milinski M (2003) Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:119–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, Ryer CH, Olla BL (1991) Social enhancement of foraging on an ephemeral food source in juvenile walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma. Env Biol Fish 31:307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barata EN, Hubbard PC, Almeida OG, Miranda A, Canario AVM (2007) Male urine signals social rank in the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). BMC Biol 5:54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basil J, Sandeman D (2000) Crayfish (Cherax destructor) use tactile cues to detect and learn topographical changes in their environment. Ethology 106:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Bongiorno T, DiCapua DM, Ivan LI, Roh E (2006) Effects of group size on the threat-sensitive response to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cues by juvenile convict cichlids. Can J Zool 84:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JG (2008) The validity of three tests of temperament in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Comp Psychol 122:344–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt de Perera T (2004) Fish can encode order in their spatial map. 2004. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271:2131–2134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crusio WE (2001) Genetic dissection of mouse exploratory behaviour. Behav Brain Res 125:127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dally JM, Clayton NS, Emery NJ (2008) Social influences on foraging by rooks (Corvus frugilegus). Behaviour 145:1101–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day RL, MacDonald T, Brown C, Laland KN, Reader SM (2001) Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foraging. Anim Behav 62:917–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Reale D, Wright J (2010) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 25:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP (2010) Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 88:698–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grand TC, Dill LM (1999) The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav 58:443–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RA, Foster JP (1998) The effect of social interactions on tadpole activity and growth in the British anuran amphibians (Bufo bufo, B. calamita, and Rana temporaria). J Zool 245:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager MC, Helfman GS (1991) Safety in numbers—shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasler AD, Cooper JC (1976) Chemical cues for homing salmon. Experientia 32:1091–1093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert-Read JE, Logendran D, Ward AJW (2010) Sensory ecology in a changing world: salinity alters conspecific recognition in an amphidromous fish, Pseudomugil signifer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1107–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin JGJ, Krause J (2004) Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Anim Behav 67:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenleyside MHA (1955) Some aspects of the schooling behaviour of fish. Behaviour 8:83–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleerekoper H, Matis J, Gensler P, Maynard P (1974) Exploratory behavior of goldfish Carassius auratus. Anim Behav 22:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C, Bunnefeld N (2009) Express your personality or go along with the group: what determines the behaviour of shoaling perch? Proc R Soc Lond B 276:3369–3375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C, Staffan F (2005) Is boldness affected by group composition in young-of-the-year perch (Perca fluviatilis)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1983) Foraging, timidity and shoal size in minnows and goldfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuthen D, Baldauf SA, Bakker TCM, Thünken T (2011) Substrate-treated water: a method to enhance fish activity in laboratory experiments. Aquat Biol 13:35–40. doi:10.3354/ab00348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikheev VN, Andreev OA (1993) 2-Phase exploration of a novel environment in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. J Fish Biol 42:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosten JE, Magnhagen C, Hemelrijk CK (2010) Boldness by habituation and social interactions: a model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:793–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (2005) A review of the biology of Gambusia affinis and G-holbrooki. Rev Fish Biol Fish 15:339–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett W, Dall SRX (2009) Sex differences, social context and personality in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 77:1041–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez SD, Gallup GG (1982) Open-field behavior in chickens—the experimenter is a predator. J Comp Physiol Psychol 96:432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers K, Klunder M, Drent PJ (2005) Context dependence of personalities: risk-taking behavior in a social and a nonsocial situation. Behav Ecol 16:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh RN, Cummins RA (1976) The open-field test—a critical-review. Psychol Bull 83:482–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AJW, Mehner T (2010) Multimodal mixed messages: the use of multiple cues allows greater accuracy in social recognition and predator detection decisions in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Behav Ecol 21:1315–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AJW, Webster MM, Hart PJB (2007) Social recognition in wild fish populations. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 274:1071–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AJW, Sumpter DJT, Couzin LD, Hart PJB, Krause J (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6948–6953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AJW, Herbert-Read JE, Sumpter DJT, Krause J (2011) Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2312–2315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MM, Hart PJB (2006) Subhabitat selection by foraging threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): previous experience and social conformity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MM, Ward AJW (2010) Personality and social context. Biological Reviews. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00169.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MM, Atton N, Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2007a) Turbidity and foraging rate in threespine sticklebacks: the importance of visual and chemical prey cues. Behaviour 144:1347–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MM, Goldsmith J, Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2007b) Habitat-specific chemical cues influence association preferences and shoal cohesion in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MM, Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2007c) Boldness is influenced by social context in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behaviour 144:351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welker WI, Welker J (1958) Reaction of fish (Eucinostomus gula) to environmental-changes. Ecology 39:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whimbey AE, Denenber VH (1967) Two independent behavioral dimensions in open-field performance. J Comp Physiol Psychol 63:500–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White JW, Warner RR (2007) Behavioral and energetic costs of group membership in a coral reef fish. Oecologia 154:423–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wisenden BD (2000) Olfactory assessment of predation risk in the aquatic environment. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 355:1205–1208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wisenden BD, Binstock CL, Knoll KE, Linke AD, Demuth BS (2010) Risk-sensitive information gathering by cyprinids following release of chemical alarm cues. Anim Behav 79:1101–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc RB (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149:269–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Ashley J. W. Ward

Authors
  1. Ashley J. W. Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley J. W. Ward.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Bakker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, A.J.W. Social facilitation of exploration in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 223–230 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1270-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1270-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation