Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperative signaling as a potential mechanism for cohesion in a gregarious sawfly larva, Perga affinis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During periods of travel or dispersive activities (e.g., foraging), group-living animals face the common challenge of maintaining a cohesive unit. At the basic level, this challenge is no different for vertebrates than it is for arthropods and is solved through communication. Gregarious larvae of the Australian sawfly, Perga affinis, communicate via vibrational signals. The most common signal, tapping, involves striking the substrate with the sclerotized tip of the abdomen. This study investigates the role of tapping as a mechanism of cohesion, specifically in situations between a separated larva and a group. As nomadic foragers that move daily to new feeding locations and readily coalesce with other colonies, the possibility of separation and potential re-aggregation arises regularly. Experiments demonstrated that tapping facilitates cohesion as groups responded to the tapping of lone larvae and did so preferentially over other larval behaviors. Additionally, separated larvae respond to tapping by the group through increased walking activity. It is also possible that they receive directional information from the group's vibratory signals, although visual cues may influence orientation as well. Tapping represents a cooperative signal and, as such, I investigated the level of investment of both parties in the communicative exchange. While individual larvae invested more in the exchange than the group, the exchange is analogous to the Raise-the-Stakes model of cooperation in that groups gradually increased their investment according to the cumulative time spent tapping by the lone larva. The mutual but asymmetrical benefits received through cooperation are discussed and compared with similar situations between parents and offspring. Not all larvae in the group participated equally, suggesting individual differences in signaling propensity or strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S (2000) Social manipulation within and between troops mediates primate group movement. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 421–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S, Mitchell CL (1992) Ecological and social factors affecting the vocal behavior of adult female squirrel-monkeys. Ethology 92:316–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carne P (1962) The characteristics and behaviour of the sawfly Perga affinis affinis (Hymenoptera). Aust J Zool 10:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carne P (1969) On the population dynamics of the eucalypt-defoliating sawfly Perga affinis affinis Kirby (Hymenoptera). Aust J Zool 17:113–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O'Riain MJ, Griffin AS, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Sharpe L, McIlrath GM (2001a) Contributions to cooperative rearing in meerkats. Anim Behav 61:705–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Russell AF, Sharpe LL, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath GM, White S, Cameron EZ (2001b) Effects of helpers on juvenile development and survival in meerkats. Science 293:2446–2449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB (2002) Antipredator defense as a limited resource: unequal predation risk in broods of an insect with maternal care. Behav Ecol 13:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čokl A, Doberlet MV (2003) Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annu Rev Entomol 48:29–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald T, Peterson S (1988) Cooperative foraging and communication in caterpillars. Bioscience 38:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher LE (2007) Vibrational signals in a gregarious sawfly larva (Perga affinis): group coordination or competitive signaling? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1809–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghent AW (1960) A study of the group-feeing behavior of larvae of the jack pine sawfly, Neodiprion pratti banksianae Roh. Behaviour 16:110–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (2000) Birds of many feathers: the formation and structure of mixed-species flocks of forest birds. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago pp 521–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart BL, Hart LA (1992) Reciprocal allogrooming in impala, Aepyceros melampus. Anim Behav 44:1073–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holekamp KE, Boydston EE, Smale L (2000) Group travel in social carnivores. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 587–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundertmark A (1937) Das Formenunterscheidungsvermögen der Eiraupen der Nonne (Lymantria monacha L.) Zeit Vergl Physiol 24:563–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt RE, Nault LR (1991) Roles of interplant movement, acoustic communication, and phototaxis in mate-location behavior of the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insley SJ (2001) Mother-offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Anim Behav 61:129–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Klok CJ, Chown SL (1999) Assessing the benefits of aggregation: thermal biology and water relations of anomalous Emperor Moth caterpillars. Funct Ecol 13:417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J (1994) Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 69:187–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons M, Dugatkin LA (1992) Cooperation among unrelated individuals—evolutionary factors. Q Rev Biol 67:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Rochow VB (1974) Structure and function of larval eye of sawfly, Perga. J Insect Physiol 20:1565–1591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen A, Flemming F, Gogala M, Traue D (1982) Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow P, Bellas T, Eisner T (1976) Eucalyptus oils in the defensive oral discharge of Australian sawfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Pergidae). Oecologia 24:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahrung HF, Dunstan PK, Allen GR (2001) Larval gregariousness and neonate establishment of the eucalypt-feeding beetle Chrysophtharta agricola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Paropsini). Oikos 94:358–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raper KB (1984) The dictyostelids. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader T, Hochuli DF (2003) Understanding gregariousness in a larval Lepidopteran: the roles of host plant, predation, and microclimate. Ecol Entomol 28:729–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G (2005) Cooperation through interdependence. Anim Behav 70:901–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G, Sherratt TN (1998) Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature 394:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovner JS, Barth FG (1981) Vibratory communication through living plants by a tropical wandering spider. Science 214:464–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour R (1974) Convective and evaporative cooling in sawfly larvae. J Insect Physiol 20:2447–2457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smolker RA, Mann J, Smuts BB (1993) Use of signature whistles during separations and reunions by wild bottle-nosed-dolphin mothers and infants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Virant-Doberlet M, Cokl A, Zorovic M (2006) Use of substrate vibrations for orientation: from behavior to physiology. In: Drosopoulos S, Claridge MF (eds) Insect sounds and communication. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, pp 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein P, Maelzer D (1997) Leadership behaviour in sawfly larvae Perga dorsalis (Hymenoptera: Pergidae). Oikos 79:450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Foley Lab and the Department of Botany and Zoology at the Australian National University for hosting me while I conducted the research. Martin Steinbauer and Rex Southerland were instrumental in identifying field populations and Anita Tseng helped with the video analysis. I would also like to thank Tom Eisner, Rob Raguso and Cole Gilbert for comments on the manuscript, Françoise Vermeylen for statistical advice, and Meredith Cosgrove for discussion of general ideas. This work was supported by an NSF Predoctoral Fellowship and a grant from Sigma Xi. The experiments comply with the current laws in Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn E. Fletcher.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Moore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, L.E. Cooperative signaling as a potential mechanism for cohesion in a gregarious sawfly larva, Perga affinis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1127–1138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0541-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0541-9

Keywords

Navigation