Abstract
During periods of travel or dispersive activities (e.g., foraging), group-living animals face the common challenge of maintaining a cohesive unit. At the basic level, this challenge is no different for vertebrates than it is for arthropods and is solved through communication. Gregarious larvae of the Australian sawfly, Perga affinis, communicate via vibrational signals. The most common signal, tapping, involves striking the substrate with the sclerotized tip of the abdomen. This study investigates the role of tapping as a mechanism of cohesion, specifically in situations between a separated larva and a group. As nomadic foragers that move daily to new feeding locations and readily coalesce with other colonies, the possibility of separation and potential re-aggregation arises regularly. Experiments demonstrated that tapping facilitates cohesion as groups responded to the tapping of lone larvae and did so preferentially over other larval behaviors. Additionally, separated larvae respond to tapping by the group through increased walking activity. It is also possible that they receive directional information from the group's vibratory signals, although visual cues may influence orientation as well. Tapping represents a cooperative signal and, as such, I investigated the level of investment of both parties in the communicative exchange. While individual larvae invested more in the exchange than the group, the exchange is analogous to the Raise-the-Stakes model of cooperation in that groups gradually increased their investment according to the cumulative time spent tapping by the lone larva. The mutual but asymmetrical benefits received through cooperation are discussed and compared with similar situations between parents and offspring. Not all larvae in the group participated equally, suggesting individual differences in signaling propensity or strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396
Boinski S (2000) Social manipulation within and between troops mediates primate group movement. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 421–469
Boinski S, Mitchell CL (1992) Ecological and social factors affecting the vocal behavior of adult female squirrel-monkeys. Ethology 92:316–330
Carne P (1962) The characteristics and behaviour of the sawfly Perga affinis affinis (Hymenoptera). Aust J Zool 10:1–34
Carne P (1969) On the population dynamics of the eucalypt-defoliating sawfly Perga affinis affinis Kirby (Hymenoptera). Aust J Zool 17:113–141
Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O'Riain MJ, Griffin AS, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Sharpe L, McIlrath GM (2001a) Contributions to cooperative rearing in meerkats. Anim Behav 61:705–710
Clutton-Brock TH, Russell AF, Sharpe LL, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath GM, White S, Cameron EZ (2001b) Effects of helpers on juvenile development and survival in meerkats. Science 293:2446–2449
Cocroft RB (2002) Antipredator defense as a limited resource: unequal predation risk in broods of an insect with maternal care. Behav Ecol 13:125–133
Čokl A, Doberlet MV (2003) Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annu Rev Entomol 48:29–50
Fitzgerald T, Peterson S (1988) Cooperative foraging and communication in caterpillars. Bioscience 38:20–25
Fletcher LE (2007) Vibrational signals in a gregarious sawfly larva (Perga affinis): group coordination or competitive signaling? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1809–1821
Ghent AW (1960) A study of the group-feeing behavior of larvae of the jack pine sawfly, Neodiprion pratti banksianae Roh. Behaviour 16:110–147
Greenberg R (2000) Birds of many feathers: the formation and structure of mixed-species flocks of forest birds. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago pp 521–558
Hamilton WD (1964) The evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hart BL, Hart LA (1992) Reciprocal allogrooming in impala, Aepyceros melampus. Anim Behav 44:1073–1083
Holekamp KE, Boydston EE, Smale L (2000) Group travel in social carnivores. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 587–627
Hundertmark A (1937) Das Formenunterscheidungsvermögen der Eiraupen der Nonne (Lymantria monacha L.) Zeit Vergl Physiol 24:563–582
Hunt RE, Nault LR (1991) Roles of interplant movement, acoustic communication, and phototaxis in mate-location behavior of the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:315–320
Insley SJ (2001) Mother-offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Anim Behav 61:129–137
Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Klok CJ, Chown SL (1999) Assessing the benefits of aggregation: thermal biology and water relations of anomalous Emperor Moth caterpillars. Funct Ecol 13:417–427
Krause J (1994) Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 69:187–206
Mesterton-Gibbons M, Dugatkin LA (1992) Cooperation among unrelated individuals—evolutionary factors. Q Rev Biol 67:267–281
Meyer-Rochow VB (1974) Structure and function of larval eye of sawfly, Perga. J Insect Physiol 20:1565–1591
Michelsen A, Flemming F, Gogala M, Traue D (1982) Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:269–281
Morrow P, Bellas T, Eisner T (1976) Eucalyptus oils in the defensive oral discharge of Australian sawfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Pergidae). Oecologia 24:193–206
Nahrung HF, Dunstan PK, Allen GR (2001) Larval gregariousness and neonate establishment of the eucalypt-feeding beetle Chrysophtharta agricola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Paropsini). Oikos 94:358–364
Raper KB (1984) The dictyostelids. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Reader T, Hochuli DF (2003) Understanding gregariousness in a larval Lepidopteran: the roles of host plant, predation, and microclimate. Ecol Entomol 28:729–737
Roberts G (2005) Cooperation through interdependence. Anim Behav 70:901–908
Roberts G, Sherratt TN (1998) Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature 394:175–179
Rovner JS, Barth FG (1981) Vibratory communication through living plants by a tropical wandering spider. Science 214:464–466
Seymour R (1974) Convective and evaporative cooling in sawfly larvae. J Insect Physiol 20:2447–2457
Smolker RA, Mann J, Smuts BB (1993) Use of signature whistles during separations and reunions by wild bottle-nosed-dolphin mothers and infants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:393–402
Trivers R (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park
Virant-Doberlet M, Cokl A, Zorovic M (2006) Use of substrate vibrations for orientation: from behavior to physiology. In: Drosopoulos S, Claridge MF (eds) Insect sounds and communication. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, pp 81–97
Weinstein P, Maelzer D (1997) Leadership behaviour in sawfly larvae Perga dorsalis (Hymenoptera: Pergidae). Oikos 79:450–455
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the Foley Lab and the Department of Botany and Zoology at the Australian National University for hosting me while I conducted the research. Martin Steinbauer and Rex Southerland were instrumental in identifying field populations and Anita Tseng helped with the video analysis. I would also like to thank Tom Eisner, Rob Raguso and Cole Gilbert for comments on the manuscript, Françoise Vermeylen for statistical advice, and Meredith Cosgrove for discussion of general ideas. This work was supported by an NSF Predoctoral Fellowship and a grant from Sigma Xi. The experiments comply with the current laws in Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. Moore
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher, L.E. Cooperative signaling as a potential mechanism for cohesion in a gregarious sawfly larva, Perga affinis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1127–1138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0541-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0541-9