Skip to main content
Log in

The role of images of conspecifics as visual cues in the development and behavior of larval anurans

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 March 2006

Abstract

Tadpoles can alter their behavior, morphology, and life history in response to habitat change. Although chemical signals from conspecifics or predators play an important role in tadpole habitat assessment, little is known about the role of visual cues and the extent to which tadpoles rely on their vision for intraspecific social assessment. The aim of our experiments was to determine whether larval anurans use visual images of other tadpoles as indicators of density and to analyze how, and to what extent, images of conspecifics alone affect tadpole development, growth, and behavior. To assess this, we raised both Rana sylvatica and Bufo americanus tadpoles in aquaria with either quarter- or half-mirrored walls. Both physically increased density and increased density simulated with mirrors decreased tadpole growth and developmental rates, and increased activity in Rana tadpoles. Bufo tadpoles did not significantly alter their growth and development in response to visually increased density. Only true, i.e., physically, increased density had an effect on growth and activity in Bufo tadpoles. Our data show that images of conspecifics are used as visual cues by Rana tadpoles and can induce phenotypically plastic changes in several traits. This response to visual cues is taxon-specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt JD (2003) Reduced burst speed is a cost of rapid growth in anuran tadpoles: problems of autocorrelation and interferences about growth rates. Funct Ecol 7:328–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, O’Hara RK (1982) Kin recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles: maternal and paternal effects. Anim Behav 30:1151–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Waldman B (1992) Kin recognition in anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 44:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Walls SC (1995) Aggregation and kin recognition. In: Heatwole H, Sullivan BK (eds) Amphibian biology 2, social behaviour. Surrey Beatty, pp 568–602

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes in identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson ES (1979) Aggregation as a defense against predators in aquatic and terrestrial environments. In: Reese RS, Lighter FJ (eds) Contrasts in behavior. Wiley, New York, pp 219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannoo MJ (1999) Integration: nervous and sensory systems. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht LE (1967) Growth inhibition in crowded tadpoles: intraspecific and interspecific effects. Ecology 48:736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator–prey interaction among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2001) The lasting effects of adaptive plasticity: predator-induced tadpoles become long-legged frogs. Ecology 82:1947–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2002) Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Monogr 72:523–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Hoverman JT (2003) The impact of larval predators and competitors on the morphology and fitness of juvenile tree frogs. Oecologia 134:596–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Werner EE (2005) Morphological plasticity of four larval anurans distributed along an environmental gradient. Copeia 178–190

  • Rennie MD, Collins NC, Shuter BJ, Rajotte JW, Couture P (2005) A comparison of methods for estimating activity costs of wild fish populations: more active fish observed to grow slower. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:767–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rot-Nikcevic I, Denver RJ, Wassersug RJ (2005) The influence of visual and tactile stimulation on growth and metamorphosis in anuran larvae. Funct Ecol (in press)

  • SAS Institute (2001) SAS/STAT version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Caldwell JP (1982) Effects of density on growth, metamorphosis, and survivorship in tadpoles of Scaphiopus holbrooki. Ecology 63:905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Reyer HU (1992) Modification of anti-predator behaviour in tadpoles by environmental conditioning. J Anim Ecol 61:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC, Van Buskirk J (1995) Phenotypic design, plasticity, and ecological performance in two tadpole species. Am Nat 145:211–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Gill SJ, Berven KA (1979) Predicting amphibian metamorphosis. Am Nat 113:563–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft (1997) STATISTICA for Windows, version 5.0. StatSoft, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • vS. Hoff K (1988) Evasive maneuvers of tadpoles and frogs in complex environments. Am Zool 28:155A

    Google Scholar 

  • vS. Hoff K, Blaustein AR, McDiarmid RW, Altig R (1999) Behavior: Interactions and their consequences. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R (eds) Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 215–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B (1982) Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications. Anim Behav 30:700–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B (1986) Chemical ecology of kin recognition in anuran amphibians. In: Duvall D, Muller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 4. Plenum, New York, pp 225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug RJ (1973) Aspects of social behavior in anuran larvae. In: Vial JH (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug RJ, Hessler CM (1971) Tadpole behaviour: aggregation in larval Xenopus laevis. Anim Behav 19:386–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug RJ, Lum AM, Potel MJ (1981) An analysis of school structure for tadpoles (Anura: Amphibia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Collins JP (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182:1305–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kerri Oseen for her help with collecting egg clutches and editorial suggestions. Rick Relyea, Bruce Waldman, David Skelly, and Marco Dadda provided critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (awarded to I.R.N. and R.J.W.) and by an I.W. Killam Memorial Scholarship (to I.R.N.). The experiments conducted herein comply with the current law of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena Rot-Nikcevic.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Christensen-Dalsgaard

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0186-0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rot-Nikcevic, I., Taylor, C.N. & Wassersug, R.J. The role of images of conspecifics as visual cues in the development and behavior of larval anurans. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 19–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0133-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0133-5

Keywords

Navigation