Skip to main content
Log in

Paternity covaries with laying and hatching order in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Females in most bird species engage in extra-pair copulations. Although this behaviour is widespread, benefits for females of doing so are less understood. The most widely accepted hypothesis is that they improve their previous choice of social partner and gain genetic benefits for their offspring. Some evidence for this comes from studies that find that extra-pair young (EPY) have greater fitness than their half-sibs. However, this might be also caused by maternal, non-genetic effect, a possibility that remains largely untested. Here we test whether EPY are laid in larger eggs or eggs laid early in the laying sequence in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). The size of eggs bearing EPY and within-pair young (WPY) did not differ, however, EPY were laid in early eggs and consequently hatched earlier than WPY. As hatching asynchrony is a strong determinant of offspring size and survival in many species, including collared flycatcher, our results suggest that a caution is needed when paternal genetic effects are to be inferred from comparison of naturally occurring half-sibs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balzer AL, Williams TD (1998) Do female zebra finches vary primary reproductive effort in relation to mate attractiveness? Behaviour 135:297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber I, Arnott SA (2000) Split-clutch IVF: a technique to examine indirect fitness consequences of mate preferences in sticklebacks. Behaviour 137:1129–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead T, Schwabl H, Burke T (2000) Testosterone and maternal effects: integrating mechanisms and function. Trends Ecol Evol 15:86–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmantier A, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM (2004) Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? J Avian Biol 35:524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colegrave N (2001) Differential allocation and good genes: comment from Colegrave. Trends Ecol Evol 16:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero PJ, Wetton JH, Parkin DT (1999) Within-clutch patterns of egg viability and paternity in the House Sparrow. J Avian Biol 30:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2001) Differential allocation and ‘good genes’: comment from Cunningham and Russell. Trends Ecol Evol 16:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JP, Kelley JL, Bisazza A, Finazzo E, Pilastro A (2004) Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2035–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N, Wells A (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Graves J (2001) Differential allocation and good genes: comment from Gil and Graves. Trends Ecol Evol 16:21–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillström L (1999) Variation in egg mass in the Pied Flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca: an experimental test of the brood survival and brood reduction hypotheses. Evol Ecol Res 1:753–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt DF (1979) Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of birds' eggs. Auk 96:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen A, Andersen V, Sunding C, Lifjeld JT (2000) Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations. Nature 406:296–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen A, Delhey K, Andersson S, Kempenaers B (2003) Plumage colour in nestling blue tits: sexual dichromatism, condition dependence and genetic effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1263–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Sheldon BC (1996) Why do male birds not discriminate between their own and extra-pair offspring? Anim Behav 51:1165–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Dhondt AA (1997) Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav Ecol 8:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven O, Lifjeld JT (2004) Extrapair paternity and offspring immunocompetence in the reed bunting, Emberiza schoeniclus. Anim Behav 68:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N (2001) Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2229–2234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krist M, Remeš V, Uvírová L, Nádvorník P, Bureš S (2004) Egg size and offspring performance in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis): a within clutch approach. Oecologia 140:52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krokene C, Rigstad K, Dale M, Lifjeld JT (1998) The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav Ecol 9:649–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubjuhn T, Strohbach S, Brun J, Gerken T, Epplen JT (1999) Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major): a long term study. Behaviour 136:1157–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath RD (1990) Hatching asynchrony in altricial birds. Biol Rev 65:587–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michl G, Török J, Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2002) Experimental analysis of sperm competition mechanisms in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5466–5470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1992) Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. Am Nat 139:1089–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Ninni P (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff BD (2004) Increased performance of offspring sired by parasitic males in bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol 15:327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris K (1993) Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major. Nature 362:537–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piálek J, Albrecht T (2005) Choosing mates: complementary versus compatible genes. Trends Ecol Evol 20:63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potti J (1998) Variation in the onset of incubation in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca): fitness consequences and constraints. J Zool 245:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Pärt T, Sheldon BC (2000) Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort. Nature 405:344–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutstein AN, Gilbert L, Slater PJB, Graves JA (2004) Mate attractiveness and primary resource allocation in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 68:1087–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Bertacche V, Ferrari RP, Martinelli R, Møller AP, Stradi R (2002a) Carotenoid concentration in barn swallow eggs is influenced by laying order, maternal infection and paternal ornamentation. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1729–1733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Ferrari RP, Martinelli R, Romano M, Rubolini D, Møller AP (2002b) Early maternal effects mediated by immunity depend on sexual ornamentation of the male partner. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1005–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2004) SAS/STAT 9.1 User's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoll T, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (2003) Long-term fitness consequences of female extra-pair matings in a socially monogamous passerine. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Ellegren H (1996) Offspring sex and paternity in the collared flycatcher. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1017–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Merilä J, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L, Ellegren H (1997) Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Ellegren H (1999) Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Anim Behav 57:285–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2001) Differential allocation and good genes: response from Sheldon. Trends Ecol Evol 16:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Arponen H, Laurila A, Crochet PA, Merilä J (2003) Sire coloration influences offspring survival under predation risk in the moorfrog. J Evol Biol 16:1288–1295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoleson SH, Beissinger SR (1995) Hatching asynchrony and the onset of incubation in birds, revisited. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology 12. Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach S, Curio E, Bathen A, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (1998) Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the "good genes" hypothesis. Behav Ecol 9:388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Borge T, Griffith SC, Saetre GP, Bureš S, Gustafsson L, Sheldon BC (2001) Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga JP(1992) Hatching asynchrony in the house sparrow: a test of the egg-viability hypothesis. Am Nat 139:669–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Clark AB, Rambo KC (1995) Within-brood patterns of paternity and paternal behavior in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham L, Dunn PO (2001) Survival of extrapair and within-pair young in tree swallows. Behav Ecol 12:496–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Grim, V. Pavel, V. Remeš, B. C. Sheldon, E. Tkadlec, K. Weidinger and several anonymous referees for valuable comments or discussion on several drafts of the manuscript. J. Stříteský greatly helped in the field. K. Weidinger kindly provided us plastic eggs. We owe forest enterprise Čechy pod Kosířem for providing the nest-boxes and the caravan. M. K. thanks Kačenka for encouragement and support. This study was supported by grants from the Czech Ministry of Education (MSM 6198959212) and from GAČR (No. 206/03/0215). The study was approved and supervised by the Ethical Committee of Palacký University and complies with the current law of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miloš Krist.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Graves

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krist, M., Nádvorník, P., Uvírová, L. et al. Paternity covaries with laying and hatching order in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59, 6–11 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0002-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0002-2

Keywords

Navigation